Reconciling Faith and History: Debunking Michelle Grim's False Claims About Moses, Alma 24:10, D&C 42:18, and Joseph Smith

 

The story of Moses stands as a monumental figure in religious texts, hailed for his unwavering faith and profound leadership. Yet, modern discussions sometimes cloud his legacy with controversy. Recently, Michelle Grim has stirred debate by alleging contradictions between Alma 24:10 and D&C 42:18, and questioning Joseph Smith's actions at Carthage Jail.

Today we have a few questions about the doctrines we see in Mormonism…

If murder is never forgiven how then did Moses appear to Jesus and the apostles at the Transfiguration?

Why did Alma contradict Joseph Smith in Doctrine and Covenants?

Which version of the Mormon ‘scripture’ should anyone believe?

What about Joe Smith who shot and killed two people before he died. Is he forgiven?

Ask a Mormon for their opinion on the contradictions ...

First, Grim engages in logical fallacies. Begging the question, she assumes the conclusion in her premise: if murder is never forgiven, how did Moses appear with Jesus? She also cherry-picks verses and presents them out of context to build a weak argument against the LDS faith.

Understanding the Latter-day Saint perspective on murder is crucial. Christ taught that the unpardonable sin is blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, not murder. Doctrine and Covenants Section 42 specifically addresses the "shedding of innocent blood." Joseph F. Smith stated that those who murder will not be forgiven, aligning with Christ’s teachings in John 5:16-17 where certain sins are unforgivable because they are "unto death."

President Joseph Fielding Smith (1876–1972) explained the Lord’s warning that those who kill will not be forgiven: “John says there are two kinds of sins [see 1 John 5:16–17]. One kind that can be forgiven; the other kind a sin unto death, for which there is no forgiveness. Murder is one of the latter class. That is where one deliberately sheds innocent blood. … The mercy of the Almighty, through the atonement of Jesus Christ, reaches out and embraces every soul who will forsake his sins, except those who have wilfully sinned, as John says, ‘unto death’” (The Restoration of All Things [1945], 204–5).

Grim overlooks important context in Exodus 2:12, where Moses kills an Egyptian. Before his calling as a prophet, Moses knew he was a Hebrew and was aware of his people's suffering. Biblical scholars suggest that Moses acted out of anger towards the Egyptian's abuse of a Hebrew, as noted in Acts 7:23-25. Moses was human, and this act did not preclude God's forgiveness. When Moses encountered God at the burning bush, it can be implied that God forgave him for his past sins.

Moses faced consequences for his actions. Fleeing into the wilderness, he met Jethro and encountered God, which suggests that his actions might have been part of a divine plan.

Regarding the supposed contradiction between Alma 24:10 and D&C 42:18, there is none. Alma 24:10 speaks of forgiveness for many sins, including murder, while D&C 42:18 details the serious nature of willful, deliberate sin, including murder.

Grim also misrepresents the account of Joseph Smith. At Carthage Jail, Smith defended himself and others against an attacking mob. His actions were in self-defense, not malicious intent. The LDS faith recognizes that those who kill in defense of themselves or others are not necessarily unforgiven.

In this post, we’ll dissect Grim's claims, clarify the scriptures in question, and shed light on the events at Carthage Jail. Understanding these topics isn't just about resolving doctrinal disputes; it's about reaffirming faith and historical accuracy. Let's delve into these complex issues and reveal the truth behind Grim’s assertions.

Moses: A Complex Figure in Religious History

Moses is a figure of immense significance across multiple faith traditions, including Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. His story is one of liberation, divine encounters, and moral guidance. However, his actions and experiences are not without controversy and complexity.

Moses and the Act of Murder

The story of Moses committing murder is one of the most dramatic episodes in the Bible. Found in the book of Exodus, Moses witnesses an Egyptian beating a Hebrew slave. Out of outrage, he kills the Egyptian and hides the body in the sand (Exodus 2:11-12). This act of murder forces Moses to flee Egypt and live in Midian, altering the course of his life.

Moses' act of murder is pivotal for several reasons:

• Moral Complexity: It shows Moses as a flawed human being, not an unattainable perfect figure.
• Catalyst for Change: This event propels Moses into a life of exile where he encounters God in the burning bush, leading to his mission to free the Israelites.
• Symbol of Justice: Despite the act being a crime, it underscores Moses' intrinsic drive for justice and protection of his people.

The murder he committed, and his subsequent flight depict Moses as a person of passion and action, setting the stage for his future role as a prophet and leader.

Moses' Role in the Transfiguration

The Transfiguration is a significant event in the New Testament, described in the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke. In this event, Jesus is transfigured and becomes radiant on a mountaintop, with Moses and Elijah appearing beside him (Matthew 17:1-3).

• Moses' Presence: The presence of Moses, symbolizing the Law, alongside Elijah, symbolizing the Prophets, signifies the fulfillment of the Old Testament in Jesus.
• Divine Endorsement: Moses' appearance serves as a divine endorsement of Jesus' mission, linking Jesus to the revered traditions of Judaism.
• Bridge Between Eras: It portrays Moses as a bridge between the old covenant and the new, being a historical figure who continues to have relevance in the new theological framework.

In Christian theology, Moses' role in the Transfiguration underscores his ongoing importance and the continuity of God's plan through different epochs.

Moses' life, from his early act of murder to his divine encounters, illustrates a journey of complexity, growth, and enduring significance. These stories contribute to understanding his multifaceted character and his essential role in religious history.

Analyzing Michelle Grim's False Claims

Michelle Grim has brought some controversial claims into the spotlight, alleging contradictions between Alma 24:10 and D&C 42:18. Let's break down these claims, understand the scriptures in question, and debunk the supposed contradictions.

Understanding Alma 24:10

First, let’s explore Alma 24:10 in the Book of Mormon. This verse is part of the story about a group of Lamanites who were converted to the gospel and decided to lay down their weapons of war rather than continue fighting.

Alma 24:10: “And I also thank my God, yea, my great God, that he hath granted unto us that we might repent of these things, and also that he hath forgiven us of those our many sins and murders which we have committed, and taken away the guilt from our hearts, through the merits of his Son.”

Context and Interpretation:

• Repentance: Alma 24:10 underscores the Lamanites' repentance. They are grateful for the ability to repent and be forgiven for their past, including murder.
• Transformation: This verse highlights a significant transformation. The Lamanites go from warriors to peaceful followers of Christ.
• Divine Forgiveness: Importantly, it shows that through sincere repentance and faith in Jesus Christ, even serious sins like murder can be forgiven.

Understanding D&C 42:18

Now, let’s look at D&C 42:18 from the Doctrine and Covenants. This section is often referred to as the “Law of the Church.”

D&C 42:18: “And now, behold, I speak unto the church. Thou shalt not kill; and he that kills shall not have forgiveness in this world, nor in the world to come.”

Context and Interpretation:

• Moral Directive: D&C 42:18 provides a clear commandment against killing. It asserts that those who commit murder will not receive forgiveness.
• Seriousness of Murder: This verse emphasizes the gravity of the sin of murder, equating it with eternal consequences.
• Covenantal Standards: It delineates the expected conduct of church members, setting a high moral standard.

Debunking the Contradiction Claim

Michelle Grim asserts that these verses contradict each other, but a closer examination shows they can be harmonized.

Points to Consider:

1. Different Contexts:

   • Alma 24:10 speaks about individuals before they knew the gospel and underscores the power of repentance and divine mercy.
   • D&C 42:18 is directed at members of the church who are already aware of the commandments, stressing the gravity of knowingly committing murder.

2. Nature of Forgiveness:

   • Repentance Before Conversion: Alma 24:10 deals with those who repented for acts committed before their conversion. It illustrates God's boundless mercy when genuine repentance is shown.
   • Post-Conversion Accountability: D&C 42:18 emphasizes the accountability of those who, having known the gospel, choose to disobey God’s commandments, specifically highlighting the seriousness of murder.

3. Spiritual Interpretation:

   • It's crucial to understand that the Book of Mormon and the Doctrine and Covenants are addressing different scenarios. The forgiveness in Alma represents God’s infinite atonement available to all, while D&C 42 focuses on the high standards expected of those who are already within the covenant.

By examining the contexts and the nature of the messages in Alma 24:10 and D&C 42:18, we see that they address different stages of spiritual understanding and accountability, thus debunking Michelle Grim’s contradiction claim. Rather than conflicting, these verses illustrate the transformation possible through Christ and the serious responsibility of living a covenant life.

Joseph Smith's Actions at Carthage Jail

Joseph Smith's final days at Carthage Jail are among the most scrutinized in the history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS). Understanding these actions and the circumstances surrounding them sheds light on his character and the dire situation he faced.

The Historical Context of Carthage Jail

In June 1844, Nauvoo, Illinois, was a town abuzz with tension. Joseph Smith, the founder of the LDS movement, had gathered numerous followers and established a thriving community. However, his growing influence and controversial practices, such as polygamy and political power, made him many enemies.

A turning point came with the destruction of the Nauvoo Expositor, a newspaper that had published critical pieces about Smith and the LDS leadership. Reacting to the threat the paper posed, Smith and the Nauvoo city council decided to destroy its press. This action triggered widespread outrage and legal consequences.

1. Smith and His Brother Arrested:

   • Joseph and his brother Hyrum were arrested and charged with treason against the state of Illinois.
   • They voluntarily traveled to Carthage, the county seat, to face these charges, hoping to avoid violent mob actions.

2. Imprisonment in Carthage Jail:

   • They were confined to Carthage Jail, a small, two-story structure.
   • Their imprisonment was amid fears of mob retaliation, which grew as time passed.

The events leading to their confinement portrayed a highly volatile environment. The Smith brothers were prepared to face legal procedures, but they were also aware of the lurking dangers outside the jail walls.

Defending His Life: Joseph Smith's Actions

In the sweltering heat of June, Joseph Smith found himself in a situation that demanded courage and quick thinking. The events that unfolded on June 27, 1844, reveal much about his character and the extreme circumstances he faced.

1. Armed Defense:

   • Joseph Smith had been given a small pistol by a friend, John Fullmer, while in Carthage Jail.
   • As a mob of about 200 men stormed the jail, Smith and his companions tried to defend themselves.
   • Joseph fired his pistol through the door several times in a desperate attempt to protect himself and the others.

2. Smith's Final Moments:

   • Despite their efforts, the mob broke through. Hyrum Smith was shot first and killed almost immediately.
   • Joseph attempted to escape through a window. As he was climbing out, he was struck by multiple bullets from the mob outside.
   • Falling to the ground, he reportedly uttered his last words: "Oh Lord, my God!"

Perception Within LDS Teachings

Joseph Smith's actions at Carthage are integral to understanding his legacy within LDS teachings.

• Martyrdom: Joseph Smith is often referred to as a martyr, someone who gave his life for his beliefs. His attempts to defend himself and his companions underscore his refusal to passively accept his fate.
• Courage and Prophetic Insight: Before heading to Carthage, Smith had prophesied, "I am going like a lamb to the slaughter, but I am calm as a summer's morning." This statement reflects his awareness of the impending danger and his acceptance of it with calm resolve.
• Human Response: His actions are also seen as a human response to an overwhelming threat. Defending oneself in such circumstances is a natural impulse, portraying Smith not just as a religious leader, but as a person fighting for his life.

Joseph Smith’s actions at Carthage Jail, marked by bravery and an instinct for survival, resonate deeply within LDS teachings. They paint a picture of a leader facing the ultimate test of faith and courage, cementing his legacy in the annals of LDS history.

Conclusion: Reconciling Faith and Historical Actions

Reconciling faith with historical actions is a journey that often requires looking deeper into the narratives and understanding the context in which events occurred. This is especially true for religious figures whose lives and actions have been subject to scrutiny over the centuries.

Understanding the Context

Historical actions must always be understood within their specific time and cultural context. Religious texts provide us with a window into a world vastly different from our own, where norms and expectations varied significantly. Joseph Smith's decision to defend himself at Carthage Jail or Moses' act of murder when defending a Hebrew slave are actions deeply rooted in their unique circumstances.

Humanizing Religious Figures

Religious figures are often seen as paragons of virtue, yet they were human beings who made decisions under immense pressure. Recognizing their humanity helps in understanding their actions better.

• Joseph Smith: In his final moments, he was doing what any person might do—fighting to protect himself and those he loved.
• Moses: His impulsive action against the Egyptian overseer underscores a deep-seated sense of justice and protection for his people.

Balancing Doctrine and Historical Actions

Balancing religious doctrine with historical actions involves a nuanced understanding of scripture and teachings:

1. Alma 24:10 vs. D&C 42:18:
   • Repentance and Forgiveness: Alma 24:10 shows the power of repentance and the mercy of divine forgiveness.
   • Responsibility and Consequences: D&C 42:18 emphasizes the importance of following commandments and the severe eternal consequences of murder.

By recognizing the distinct contexts these scriptures address, believers can appreciate the broader spiritual narrative about growth, transformation, and accountability.

How Believers Can Move Forward

For believers, reconciling faith with historical actions involves a few key approaches:

• Seek Understanding: Dive into the historical and cultural contexts of religious texts. Understanding the era and circumstances helps paint a clearer picture.
• Embrace Complexity: Accept that religious figures had complex lives and made difficult choices. They were models of faith but were also human.
• Reflect on Teachings: Reflect on how the teachings and actions of religious figures apply today. What can we learn about justice, repentance, and courage from their stories?

Believers can reconcile faith and historical actions by embracing the full spectrum of human experience these figures represent. This approach not only deepens understanding but also strengthens faith, illustrating the timeless relevance of their journeys.