Joseph Smith Greater Than Isaiah or Moses? An LDS Perspective on Prophets and Doctrine

 

The claim that Latter-day Saints see Joseph Smith as greater than Isaiah or Moses is both provocative and misleading. Critics often present this statement as evidence of misplaced devotion, framing it as a rejection of Biblical authority. But anyone familiar with Latter-day Saint teachings knows that such a comparison misrepresents their view of prophets.

Honestly. Do you really believe Smith is greater than Isaiah or Moses?

For Latter-day Saints, Joseph Smith’s importance stems from his role in the Restoration, not from competition with other prophetic figures like Moses or Isaiah.

This post will address the context behind this claim, highlight the logical fallacies used in such arguments, and provide insights into Latter-day Saint perspectives. By untangling the rhetoric, I’ll clarify how respect for Joseph Smith doesn’t diminish the foundational place of Biblical prophets within the faith. Let’s look at the facts without the distortions.

Historical Context of the 'Greater Than' Statement

The statement that Joseph Smith is seen as "greater than Moses or Isaiah" can raise eyebrows, especially when pulled out of context. For Latter-day Saints, such claims are never about spiritual superiority over Biblical prophets but rather emphasize Joseph Smith’s pivotal role within the Restoration. To understand this better, we need to explore the historical origin of this comment and unpack what "greater" actually means in this context.

The Source of the Claim

The origin of the claim comes from the introduction written by John Henry Evans in Discourses of the Prophet Joseph Smith. Evans, an early historian and biographer of Joseph Smith, described the Prophet as a monumental figure whose legacy reshaped religious thought and influenced millions. His statement reads, "In thirty nations are men and women who look upon him as a greater leader than Moses and a greater prophet than Isaiah."

Here is a man who was born in the stark hills of Vermont; who was reared in the backwoods of New York; who never looked inside a college or high school; who lived in six States, no one of which would own him during his lifetime; who spent months in the vile prisons of the period; who, even when he had his freedom, was hounded like a fugitive; who was covered once with a coat of tar and feathers, and left for dead; who, with his following, was driven by irate neighbors from New York to Ohio, from Ohio to Missouri, and from Missouri to Illinois; and who, at the unripe age of thirty-eight, was shot to death by a mob with painted faces.

Yet this man became mayor of the biggest town in Illinois and the state's most prominent citizen, the commander of the largest body of trained soldiers in the nation outside the Federal army, the founder of cities and a university, and aspired to become President of the United States.

He wrote a book which has baffled the literary critics for a hundred years and which is today more widely read than any other volume save the Bible. On the threshold of an organizing age he established the most nearly perfect social mechanism in the modern world, and developed a religious philosophy that challenges anything of the kind in history, for completeness and cohesion. And he set up the machinery for an economic system that would take the brood of Fears out of the heart of man—the fear of want through sickness, old age, unemployment, and poverty.

In thirty nations are men and women who look upon him as a greater leader than Moses and a greater prophet than Isaiah; his disciples now number close to a million [the present figure is over 3.5 million]; and already a granite shaft pierces the sky over the place where he was born, and another is in course of erection over the place where he is credited with having received the inspiration for his Book. (John Henry Evans, op. cit., introduction.)

But what was Evans trying to communicate? He wasn’t pitting Joseph Smith against Moses or Isaiah in a spiritual competition. Instead, his words reflected the real-world impact of Joseph Smith’s leadership during the early growth phase of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. By the early 20th century, the Church had grown to nearly a million members and was becoming a global faith. Evans was using hyperbole as a rhetorical device, common in biographical writing of that time, to highlight Joseph's outsized influence as a modern-day prophet. It’s important to note that Evans was not delivering doctrine but offering a biographical perspective rooted in the accomplishments of Joseph Smith’s life.

For critics to use this statement as a foundational argument against Latter-day Saint beliefs is disingenuous. It confuses Evans’ literary flourish with formal LDS teachings—a leap that simply doesn’t hold up under scrutiny.

Understanding 'Greater' in Context

So, what does "greater" really mean here? If you read the context carefully, it’s clear that the term is used in reference to Joseph Smith’s role in the Restoration and how it addressed specific needs of his time. To Latter-day Saints, Joseph Smith stands out not because he’s better than Moses or Isaiah at prophesying or leading, but because his calling dealt directly with restoring Jesus Christ’s church in a modern context. It’s a comparison of roles rather than a comparison of worth.

Consider it this way: Is a firefighter greater than a builder because they save lives? The answer depends on which role you’re looking at. Both serve essential purposes, but their contributions are unique to their responsibilities. The Restoration—a movement that re-established doctrines, priesthood authority, and sacred ordinances—required a modern prophet to take on a mission very different from Moses delivering Israel or Isaiah prophesying of the Messiah.

In LDS theology, each prophet serves God in a divine capacity suited to their era. Joseph Smith’s "greatness" lies in his specific, God-given task to restore lost truths and open a new dispensation. His work didn’t replace or overshadow Biblical prophets but built on their foundational teachings. This should serve as a reminder that the "greater than" argument, when taken literally, distorts the nuanced LDS perspective on prophets.

By focusing on influence and leadership specific to his era, the statement about Joseph Smith wasn't meant to demean Biblical figures. Instead, it underscored how unique his mission was in the timeline of God’s work with His children on earth.

The Role of Prophets in Latter-day Saint Theology

Prophets occupy a central role in Latter-day Saint theology, serving as God’s messengers to guide His children on earth. They provide the link between heaven and humanity, offering revelation, guidance, and correction as necessary. The Restoration, facilitated by Joseph Smith, shines a spotlight on the continuing need for prophets in the modern era—a hallmark belief of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Let’s break down this concept by exploring the roles of past and present prophets.

Prophets as Instruments of God

Latter-day Saint theology often references Amos 3:7, which reads, “Surely the Lord God will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets.” This belief underscores the idea that God works through prophets to accomplish His purposes. Prophets, in the LDS perspective, speak with divine authority, not because they are infallible but because they are chosen and directed by God.

For members of the Church, prophets are the means by which God reveals His will for the Church and for humanity. This process doesn’t replace personal revelation but complements it. Why is this important? Because Latter-day Saints believe in a God who is actively involved in His children’s lives, offering wisdom both collectively through prophets and individually through personal prayer and study.

Prophets are seen as guides, akin to a lighthouse for mariners. Just as a lighthouse cut through thick fog to guide ships safely to shore, prophets illuminate the way toward spiritual safety and eternal life. Their words, when received with faith, are believed to bring blessings, order, and peace to the lives of individuals and the Church alike.

Respect for Ancient Prophets

Respect for biblical prophets like Moses and Isaiah plays a vital role in Latter-day Saint worship and scripture study. These ancient figures are revered not only for their wisdom but also for their steadfast commitment to God’s will, despite immense challenges.

Take Moses, who led the Israelites from bondage in Egypt. He is honored as a prototype for leadership, intercession, and prophecy. Isaiah, often called one of the greatest writing prophets, carries a similar standing for his poetic insights into Christ’s mission and God’s grace. His words are not abstract; they are studied deeply in LDS worship and are even quoted extensively in the Book of Mormon—a testament to how integral his teachings are in the faith.

One of the misunderstandings about Latter-day Saints is the notion that they elevate modern prophets at the expense of ancient ones. Instead, LDS theology emphasizes continuity. Moses, Isaiah, and other prophets shaped the foundation of faith, while modern prophets build on it. The scriptures, both ancient and modern, work together like the intertwining threads of a tapestry, creating a complete and harmonious picture of God’s plan.

Joseph Smith's Unique Role

Joseph Smith stands out in Latter-day Saint theology not as a competitor to ancient prophets but as someone whose mission responded to the unique needs of his era. The Restoration of Jesus Christ’s church in the 19th century required a prophet who could serve as a translator, restorer, and organizer. Joseph’s role was less about writing majestic prophecies and more about laying down the infrastructure for the restored gospel.

Through Joseph Smith, doctrines such as the nature of God, eternal families, and modern priesthood authority were clarified and restored. His work didn’t replace Moses’ leadership or Isaiah’s prophecies; it complemented them. Think of it as adding vital chapters to a book that had been incomplete—a continuation rather than a rewrite.

Joseph Smith’s mission wasn’t about self-exaltation but about fulfilling God’s purposes in an age that lacked direct prophetic guidance. His life, often misunderstood by critics, offers a clearer view of how God uses ordinary individuals for extraordinary missions. By focusing on his role in restoring truths lost over centuries, it becomes evident that his greatness lies in his obedience and his willingness to serve.

Putting Joseph Smith in a modern context doesn’t diminish Moses, Isaiah, or any other biblical prophet. Instead, it weaves their teachings into the ongoing work of God. For Latter-day Saints, this ongoing revelation is evidence of a living, active God who continues to speak to His children today.

Refuting Misrepresentations of Isaiah in LDS Practices

When critics accuse Latter-day Saints of sidelining Isaiah in favor of modern figures like Joseph Smith, they paint an incomplete and misleading picture. Isaiah holds a vital place in LDS doctrine, scripture, and teachings, complementing the work of restoration rather than being overshadowed. Let’s explore how Isaiah’s writings are deeply ingrained in LDS theology.

Isaiah in the Book of Mormon

If there's one thing you can't ignore in the Book of Mormon, it’s how much Isaiah shows up. Over 30% of Isaiah is either quoted or paraphrased in this sacred text. Nephi, one of its central figures, draws heavily from Isaiah to teach about Jesus Christ and God’s covenant with Israel. Specifically, the chapters in 2 Nephi 12–24 consist almost entirely of Isaiah’s words. Why? Because Isaiah’s writings underscore key themes that are relevant for all epochs: Christ’s atonement, the scattering and gathering of Israel, and the eventual establishment of God’s kingdom on Earth.

Think of it this way: If Isaiah’s words were unimportant, why would Nephi go to such lengths to include and explain them? Nephi himself provides a road map for understanding Isaiah, teaching readers to study with a testimony of Christ and an understanding of Jewish history and culture. This connection bridges the Old Testament and the Restoration, showing that Isaiah’s prophecies haven’t lost their relevance—they’ve gained dimension.

Far from neglecting Isaiah, the incorporation of his writings into the Book of Mormon highlights their eternal importance. Whether Isaiah is prophesying Christ’s coming, describing the scattering of Israel, or speaking about repentance, his influence forms a backbone of LDS scripture.

Isaiah's Influence in Modern Teachings

Isaiah doesn’t just show up in ancient scripture; he’s threaded throughout modern LDS teachings, including General Conference talks and Church curricula. In fact, Church leaders frequently cite Isaiah’s prophetic vision as a cornerstone of understanding Christ’s mission and the events of the last days. President Russell M. Nelson has called Isaiah’s words “an enduring witness of the Savior.”

LDS study manuals, such as those used in seminary and the "Come, Follow Me" program, spend significant time unpacking Isaiah’s teachings. These resources connect Isaiah’s words to both spiritual growth and modern events. For instance, Isaiah 53’s vivid depiction of the Savior’s atoning sacrifice is a recurring focus, helping members deepen their gratitude for Christ’s role as Redeemer.

In General Conference, his prophecies about the Restoration and the gathering of Israel are referenced often, underscoring their relevance today. Take Isaiah 2:2-3, where the temple is described as being established in the "mountain of the Lord." Latter-day Saint leaders frequently teach that this prophecy is being fulfilled through the construction of temples worldwide. Isaiah isn’t some ancient relic in LDS thought; he’s a living voice guiding us toward future promises.

Correcting Misconceptions

Let’s address the claim that Isaiah is unknown or underemphasized among Latter-day Saints. Critics often mistake individual ignorance for institutional neglect. But think about it: Is it fair to judge an entire faith based on a single person’s level of scriptural knowledge? Hardly. It’s like saying a library doesn’t value classic literature just because one visitor hasn’t read Shakespeare.

In her defense I hadn’t heard of Isaiah as a Mormon, so it was no surprise when she told me she’d never heard of him.

The reality is that Isaiah is consistently central in LDS doctrine and culture. Members are encouraged to study his writings, often with extensive resources to aid in comprehension. The challenge of understanding Isaiah’s poetic and symbolic style doesn’t diminish his importance—it magnifies the care taken to grasp his teachings.

Dismissing Latter-day Saints’ respect for Isaiah because someone referred to "Joseph" without his last name misses the bigger picture. These assumptions create straw-man arguments, ignoring the deep interconnectedness between Isaiah’s teachings and LDS beliefs. Joseph Smith himself emphasized the importance of Isaiah, frequently referencing him in sermons and teachings to illustrate the continuity between ancient and modern revelation.

Simply put, Isaiah’s presence in Latter-day Saint scripture, study, and discussion isn’t just significant—it’s foundational. To argue otherwise is to overlook the tapestry of efforts made by the Church to bring Isaiah’s teachings to life for its members. Far from being disregarded, Isaiah’s words are a compass, helping both individuals and the collective Church navigate the path toward Christ.

The Centrality of Jesus Christ in Latter-day Saint Doctrine

In The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Jesus Christ holds a foundational role that influences every aspect of the faith. This is not a peripheral acknowledgment—it’s an unmistakable declaration woven into the name, scriptures, and worship practices of the Church.

When I asked her about her favorite she replied “Joseph” without using Smith’s last name. I’ve always found that interesting. They’ll refer to Joseph Smith by just his first name but never use the name of Jesus. Instead, they refer to him by His title of Christ and never His given name.

This is no accident.

For members, Christ is not merely a figure in history; He is central to their salvation, their worship, and their hope for the future. Let’s break it down further.

The Church's Official Name: 'The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints' as a Declaration of Faith in Christ

The name itself, "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints," is a statement of belief. It leaves no doubt about whom the Church follows and whose teachings it upholds. Unlike vague or generalized titles, this name proclaims Jesus Christ as the head of the Church. It’s a constant reminder that He is the cornerstone of its teachings, ordinances, and mission.

In 2018, Church leadership reemphasized using the full name instead of shorthand terms like "the Mormon Church." Why? Because calling the Church by its proper name honors Christ and reinforces His centrality to both members and the world at large. It sends a clear message: this faith is about Him, not just another religious organization. President Russell M. Nelson explained that omitting His name could lead to misunderstandings about the Church’s focus. It’s not about branding; it’s about aligning with Christ’s role in God’s plan.

By using His name, members affirm their commitment to follow Christ’s teachings and example. This isn’t some small technicality—it’s a way to point everything back to the Savior.

Jesus Christ in LDS Scriptures: Christ in the Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, and Other Texts

If you flip open the Book of Mormon, one thing becomes immediately clear: it is saturated with teachings about Jesus Christ. Some scholars estimate that Christ is referenced, in one way or another, on nearly every page. The Book of Mormon explicitly calls Him "the Savior of the world" and “the Son of God.” Its purpose, as stated in its introduction, is to convince all people to believe in Jesus Christ.

Consider these striking examples:

• 2 Nephi 2:6-8 discusses Christ’s atonement, emphasizing that salvation comes only through His grace.
• Mosiah 3:17 boldly declares that “there shall be no other name given nor any other way nor means whereby salvation can come.”
• Ether 12:27 points to His enabling power, often referred to as grace, which helps humanity overcome weaknesses.

The Doctrine and Covenants, another set of revealed scripture, is similarly Christ-centered. It documents modern revelations, many of which directly quote Him. These teachings emphasize His role as Redeemer, the importance of repentance, and His active involvement in guiding the Church today.

Even the Pearl of Great Price contains moments of direct connection to the Savior. For instance, the book of Moses recounts a profound vision in which Adam and Eve learn that only through Jesus Christ can they obtain salvation.

For Latter-day Saints, these texts work together like instruments in an orchestra, harmonizing to testify of Christ’s divinity, mission, and relevance in both ancient and modern times.

Hymns and Worship Practices: Jesus is Central to LDS Hymns, Prayers, and Ordinances

Every Sunday, members of the Church participate in a sacred ordinance called the sacrament. This practice focuses entirely on Jesus Christ. They partake of bread and water, symbolizing His broken body and shed blood, as a way to renew their covenants with Him. It’s not just a ritual—it’s a deeply personal reminder of the Savior’s atonement and their commitment to follow Him.

But the centrality of Christ doesn’t stop there. Look at the hymns sung in LDS meetings. Titles like "I Stand All Amazed," "Come, Follow Me," and "I Believe in Christ" leave no room for doubt about who is being praised. These hymns express gratitude for His grace and encourage members to emulate His teachings.

Even daily prayers, whether offered individually or in families, are centered on Christ. Members are taught to address prayers to Heavenly Father, but in the name of Jesus Christ. This reflects a profound belief in His role as the mediator between God and humanity.

Temples—sacred spaces for Latter-day Saints—also highlight Christ’s atoning sacrifice in their ordinances. Everything from baptisms for the dead to eternal marriage ceremonies points to His role in the plan of salvation. He is the focus, not just a part of the experience.

When seen as a whole, these practices paint a clear picture: worship among Latter-day Saints always orbits around Jesus Christ—the Savior, Redeemer, and centerpiece of their faith.

Responding to Logical Fallacies in Criticism

When discussing Joseph Smith and his role in Latter-day Saint theology, critics often employ logical fallacies that distort the teachings and beliefs of the Church. These fallacies may seem persuasive on the surface, but with a bit of reasoning, they unravel. Here, I’ll explore four common fallacies and how to respond to them effectively.

Hasty Generalizations: Individual experiences cannot reflect church-wide teachings.

Critics sometimes generalize about Latter-day Saint beliefs based on isolated incidents or individual actions. For instance, just because one member emphasizes Joseph Smith while being unfamiliar with Isaiah doesn’t mean this reflects the doctrine of the Church as a whole. This is an example of a "hasty generalization"—drawing a conclusion about an entire group based on limited information.

Take this analogy: If a single tree in a forest is diseased, you wouldn't declare the entire forest dead, would you? The same principle applies here. Church teachings are grounded in scripture and official doctrine, not the personal knowledge or experiences of every member.

When responding, emphasize that church-wide teachings are clear: the words of both ancient prophets, like Isaiah, and modern prophets, like Joseph Smith, are studied and revered. It’s impossible to judge the breadth of Latter-day Saint theology on the assumptions critics draw from one person’s scriptural knowledge or choice of words.

False Dichotomies: Joseph Smith’s role enhances rather than contradicts biblical teachings.

Another fallacy is the false dichotomy, where critics frame Latter-day Saint beliefs as an “either/or” scenario: Either you believe Isaiah and Moses were great prophets, or you believe Joseph Smith overshadows them. This approach pits figures unnecessarily against one another, disregarding how LDS theology integrates the roles of all prophets in God’s work.

The truth is, belief in Joseph Smith does not diminish reverence for biblical prophets. Instead, Latter-day Saints teach that each prophet has a unique role. Think of it as a team working toward the same goal: Moses led Israel to freedom, Isaiah prophesied of the Messiah, and Joseph Smith restored lost truths. Each role complements the others—none stands alone.

Rather than rejecting biblical teachings, the Restoration enhances them. Joseph Smith didn’t just admire figures like Moses and Isaiah; he stood on their shoulders, building on the foundation they laid. Criticisms presenting this as a competition lack understanding of the harmony LDS doctrine seeks to uphold.

Strawman Arguments: Distortions of Latter-day Saint doctrines about prophets and Jesus Christ.

A common tactic is the strawman argument—misrepresenting LDS beliefs to make them easier to attack. A critic might say, “Latter-day Saints think Joseph Smith replaces Jesus Christ or Old Testament prophets,” then proceed to dismantle that fictitious assertion.

Let’s set the record straight. Joseph Smith is viewed as a prophet who restored Christ's church—not as a substitute for Jesus or biblical figures. If anything, Latter-day Saints often describe Joseph Smith as a tool used by Christ to carry out God's plan. It’s like crediting an artist's tools for the masterpiece instead of the artist; everyone knows the tools didn’t create the work, but they played a role in bringing the vision to life.

The central figure in Latter-day Saint theology is, and always has been, Jesus Christ. All prophets—whether Isaiah, Moses, or Joseph Smith—point to Him. Misrepresenting this truth ignores the cornerstone of LDS teaching and serves only to confuse outsiders.

Ad Hominem Attacks: Critique the use of derogatory language and personal attacks in detracting from meaningful dialogue.

Finally, we have the ad hominem attack, where critics target Joseph Smith’s character instead of addressing the principles of his teachings. These attacks often rely on derogatory language, such as calling him a fraud, liar, or charlatan. While this tactic might provoke emotion, it fails to engage with the actual substance of LDS beliefs.

Think about it: Would you discredit all of Einstein’s discoveries by pointing out flaws in his personal life? Of course, not—his ideas stand on their own merit. Similarly, discrediting Joseph Smith’s mission based on personal attacks distracts from evaluating the doctrine and evidence presented by the Restoration.

In any discussion, shift the focus back to the teachings. Point out that labeling someone with insults doesn’t prove anything about the validity of their work. Instead, request a discussion grounded in ideas and evidence, not name-calling.

By addressing logical fallacies, we create space for dialogues that are more meaningful and accurate. Criticism of Latter-day Saint doctrine often falters under its own misconceptions, offering an opportunity to clarify and share the profound connections between biblical teachings and the Restoration.

Interconnections Between Moses, Isaiah, and Joseph Smith in LDS Teachings

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS) holds that God’s work follows a consistent, divine pattern, aligning ancient prophetic missions with the efforts of Joseph Smith. Prophets like Moses and Isaiah provided pivotal teachings and revelations that shaped their societies, while Joseph Smith served as the instrument for restoring God’s truth in modern times. The connections among these prophets emphasize continuity in divine revelation, reinforcing that truth comes line upon line and precept upon precept across generations.

Moses and Isaiah in the Book of Mormon

The Book of Mormon extensively recognizes the teachings of Moses and Isaiah, portraying them as integral to understanding God’s covenant with His people. These prophets are not peripheral figures; their words are deeply embedded within the text and hold profound theological significance.

Isaiah is the most quoted prophet in the Book of Mormon, with entire chapters such as 2 Nephi 12–24 dedicated to his writings. Nephi, a central Book of Mormon figure, explains his use of Isaiah’s teachings in 1 Nephi 19:23: “...that I might more fully persuade them to believe in the Lord their Redeemer.” Isaiah’s prophecies about the scattering and gathering of Israel, the coming of the Messiah, and the establishment of God’s kingdom are applied directly to the Nephite experience. This demonstrates the timelessness of his messages, as both ancient Israel and the Nephites faced parallel circumstances of covenant faithfulness and divine deliverance.

Moses, though not explicitly quoted as often as Isaiah, is referenced as a symbol of leadership and moral law. In Mosiah 12:33-34, the prophet Abinadi cites the Ten Commandments given to Moses, underscoring their enduring relevance. Furthermore, the Nephites observed the Law of Moses until Christ fulfilled it, as noted in 3 Nephi 15:4-5, where Jesus clarifies He came to end the law, not to destroy it. This reflects the theology of continuity: Moses’ contributions prepared the way for Christ’s atonement and ultimate fulfillment of divine law.

For Latter-day Saints, Isaiah’s poetic warnings and Moses’ leadership mirror broader themes in their faith—faithfulness to God’s commandments, the consequences of disobedience, and the assurance of divine mercy. These prophets’ works serve as a foundational framework for understanding the gospel of Jesus Christ’s eternal truths.

Joseph Smith as a Continuation of God’s Work

Joseph Smith, in LDS theology, is not seen as superseding Biblical prophets but as continuing their divine mission in a new era. His role is described as the Restoration prophet, responsible for reestablishing God’s Church during what Latter-day Saints call the Dispensation of the Fulness of Times.

Moses led the Israelites to physical and spiritual liberation, while Isaiah’s voice echoed the reality of a coming Savior and the scattering of Israel. Joseph Smith’s mission, likewise, was to gather Israel once again through restored priesthood authority and revealed scripture. Doctrine and Covenants 35:17-18 states, “...I have given unto thee, my servant Joseph, to bring to pass much restoration unto the house of Israel.” This reveals how Smith’s calling directly links to themes laid out by Moses and Isaiah, bringing their prophecies to fruition.

His contributions include the translation of the Book of Mormon—replete with Isaiah’s teachings—and the restoration of covenants, ordinances, and priesthood authority that had been lost. In a sense, Smith acted as a bridge between ancient truth and modern application, ensuring that God’s work was not fragmented but continued in an unbroken chain.

One way to comprehend this relationship is by thinking of Moses, Isaiah, and Joseph Smith as torchbearers in the relay of God’s work. Each prophet passed the light of truth to the next, illuminating the path for successive generations to follow. Their roles were distinct yet interlocking, much like pieces of a puzzle creating one complete picture of God’s plan for His children.

In the LDS faith, Joseph Smith is celebrated not as a replacement for prophets like Moses or Isaiah but as the servant God called to restore truths for the modern world. His efforts reflect the same divine inspiration seen in his predecessors, emphasizing a cohesiveness in God’s work across time. Instead of isolated moments of revelation, the Restoration aligns with the prophetic tradition that always points to Jesus Christ and His mission for humanity.

This continuity underscores a critical LDS teaching: God speaks to His children in every age, adapting His guidance to meet their needs. Both ancient and modern prophets serve as instruments in His hands, united by their shared purpose to bring His will to Earth. For Latter-day Saints, this interconnectedness of Moses, Isaiah, and Joseph Smith offers a testament to the eternal nature of divine truth.

The Significance of Joseph Smith in Latter-day Saint Belief

For members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Joseph Smith is more than just a historical figure; he is seen as the primary instrument in God's modern-day work to restore truths that had been lost over centuries. His life, teachings, and revelations play a central role in how Latter-day Saints understand their relationship with God and their purpose as individuals and as a Church. Understanding Joseph Smith’s significance requires looking at his accomplishments, his prophetic mission, and how his role fits within a belief system that reveres all prophets.

The Restoration of the Gospel

Joseph Smith’s contribution to Latter-day Saint belief starts with what is known as the Restoration of the Gospel. According to LDS teachings, this Restoration marked the moment when God restored vital elements of His original Church after centuries of apostasy. Central to this Restoration was the publication of the Book of Mormon, a sacred text that Latter-day Saints revere alongside the Bible.

• The Book of Mormon, which Smith translated from ancient records through divine assistance, is considered a second testimony of Jesus Christ. It complements the Bible by clarifying doctrines and enhancing the understanding of Christ’s mission and God’s covenants with His children.
• Additionally, Joseph Smith’s establishment of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in 1830 formalized the Restoration. His work laid what Latter-day Saints believe to be the necessary foundation for priesthood authority, sacred ordinances, and organized worship to flourish in the modern age.

Smith’s revelations also restored doctrines that had been obscured or lost. Teachings on eternal families, clarity about God’s nature, the plan of salvation, and the purpose of temples gave millions of people answers to life’s most pressing questions. These accomplishments were not attempts to erase Christianity’s past but to restore and complete it. The Restoration is viewed not as a replacement of Biblical truths but as a continuation of them.

To sum it up, Joseph Smith’s work didn’t just fill gaps—it reconnected Christianity to what Latter-day Saints view as its original form, straight from divine revelation. His legacy is rooted in service to this divine mission, not in self-exaltation or personal ambition.

Acknowledging All Prophets

One of the most misunderstood aspects of Latter-day Saint belief is how prophets—both ancient and modern—are regarded. Critics often suggest Joseph Smith is elevated above prophets like Moses or Isaiah, but that isn’t consistent with LDS theology. Instead, there is a profound respect for all prophets as instruments of God’s will.

Latter-day Saints believe that prophets are united in their purpose. Whether it’s Moses leading Israel out of bondage or Joseph Smith organizing the Restoration, each prophet fulfills a specific mission tailored to their time and circumstances.

• Moses is celebrated in LDS teachings for bringing the Law and leading Israel to freedom. His leadership and covenantal role prepare the way for Christ’s eventual fulfillment of the law.
• Isaiah, known for his poetic and deeply messianic prophecies, is frequently quoted in LDS scripture. His writings form a pivotal connection between ancient Israel and the Restoration, emphasizing universal salvation and God’s eternal promises.

Rather than creating competition, LDS teachings emphasize the continuity of prophecy. Prophets are branches on the same tree, drawing strength from the same divine root. Joseph Smith built upon, not over, what Moses, Isaiah, and countless others contributed to God’s work. In LDS scripture and teaching, these figures are interconnected, forming a cohesive narrative about God’s plan for humanity.

For Latter-day Saints, revering Joseph Smith doesn’t mean disregarding ancient prophets. It means celebrating the fact that God’s work is ongoing, with prophets in every dispensation pointing toward Jesus Christ as the ultimate source of truth and salvation. Just as Moses brought the Ten Commandments and Isaiah foresaw the Savior’s suffering, Joseph Smith’s contributions highlight God’s continued relationship with humanity. These roles are complementary, not adversarial.

Latter-day Saints affirm that prophets—whether from the pages of the Bible or modern history—are unified in their mission to bring God's children closer to Him. This belief underscores a doctrine of unity, not hierarchy, among the prophets who have shaped humanity's spiritual path.

Conclusion

Joseph Smith's role in Latter-day Saint theology isn't about competing with or overshadowing prophets like Moses or Isaiah—it’s about continuity and divine purpose. Each prophet, whether ancient or modern, plays a unique part in God’s plan, building upon the work of those who came before them. For members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Joseph Smith’s leadership in the Restoration complements the foundational teachings of Old Testament prophets while reaffirming the centrality of Jesus Christ.

Discussions around these topics should move beyond divisive comparisons and focus on the shared mission of all prophets to bring people closer to God. I encourage respectful, informed dialogue that seeks to understand rather than perpetuate misconceptions. After all, the common thread for all believers—whether they honor Moses, Isaiah, or Joseph Smith—should always lead to the Savior, Jesus Christ. Let’s use these conversations to strengthen faith, not create unnecessary divides.

Where Are the Gold Plates? An In-Depth Analysis

 

Contributing writer at Life After Ministries blog posits the following question in their latest post: Where are the Gold Plates? The writer quotes from Bruce R. McConkie's Mormon Doctrine. Along with quoting from Mormon Doctrine, a quote from Ephesians 4:14 follows with a brief commentary:

There's not a shred of evidence these plates let alone the angel Moroni ever existed except in the mind of Joseph Smith.

Sadly, the Mormon people will never see those plates to prove the existence of their god or even the ancient inhabitants of Mesoamerica. Unlike all the archaeological evidence that have been unearthed showing the existence of cities and people from the bible, nothing has ever been found to back up the stories in the Book of Mormon - not even a pottery shard.

The writer goes on and cites 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 and states how they are praying each and every day the eyes of the Mormon people will be opened to receive the truth that's already been presented to them in the Bible.

Life After Ministry begs the question in their post. Despite this, it's a question our critics typically ask. Unfortunately, it is a loaded question with an implication that there is no archaeological evidence to support the existence of such plates. Given the fact that the plates Joseph Smith received to translate are central to the Book of Mormon and the foundation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Upon completion of the translation, Joseph Smith returned the plates back to the Angel Moroni. While critics question the existence of these plates, the testimony and witnesses and their spiritual significance remain pivotal for Latter-day Saint faith. My attempt, in this post, is to respectfully address Life After Ministry's critique, highlighting faith, historical context, and reason the plates' physical location should not overshadow their divine purpose.

Understanding the Role of the Gold Plates

Joseph Smith proclaimed how the Book of Mormon is the keystone of the Restored Gospel. In his June 26, 1997, address for new mission presidents (published in the July 2020 edition of the New Era), Elder Jeffrey R. Holland shares this:

It is impossible to overstate the role that the Book of Mormon has played from the beginning of this dispensation - and the role it will continue to play as the basic declaration of the truthfulness of the Gospel as restored through the Prophet Joseph Smith.

In his book titled Christ and the New Covenant, Elder Holland shares this:

The Prophet Joseph's expression that the Book of Mormon is 'the keystone of our religion' is a profound and crucial observation. A keystone is positioned at the uppermost center of an arch in such a way as to hold all the other stones in place. That key piece, if removed, will bring all of the other blocks crashing down with it. The truthfulness of the Book of Mormon - its origins, its doctrines, and the circumstances of its coming forth - is central to the truthfulness of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Central to the Book of Mormon and the foundation of the Restored Gospel of Jesus Christ is Joseph Smith's account of receiving these gold plates. For Latter-day Saints, they are not merely artifacts - they are symbols of divine purpose and faith. To better address the question posited by the writer at Life After Ministry - Where are the Gold Plates? - it is quite essential to comprehend both their historical role and their enduring signifiance within the Latter-day Saint faith.

Historical Background of the Gold Plates

Joseph Smith provides a detailed account of receiving the gold plates. According to this narrative, he recounts a visitation by Moroni that began in 1823. In this vision - the Angel Moroni - revealed the location of the plates, buried in a stone box on a hill in Manchester, New York. Joseph Smith described these plates as appearing to be golden, bound by rings, and engraved in what is called reformed Egyptian. And that these plates contained the history and account of Ancient American civilizations.

The narrative describes how Smith had to return to the place annually for four years and receive instructions from Moroni. A time of spiritual preperation for before retreiving the gold plates.

Steven C. Harper provides insight from Joseph's Manuscript History and how the narrative is terse:

"Here Joseph's Manuscript History is terse: "I made an attempt to take them out, but was forbidden by the messenger" (Joseph Smith - History 1:53). That account was composed after a high tide of persecution and "many reports ... put in circulation by evil-disposed and designing persons" (Joseph Smith - History 1:1). Perhaps because of that opposition, Joseph minimized in his Manuscript History parts of the story that could be weaponized against him, including the covetousness Moroni warned him about. According to his brief 1832 autobiography, Joseph, "cried unto the Lord in the agony of my soul why can I not obtain them [the plates]." Moroni appeared and answered,

"You have not kept the commandments of the Lord which I gave unto you therefore you cannot now obtain them for the time is not yet fulfilled therefore thou was left unto temptation that thou mightest be made accquainted of with the power of the advisary therefore repent and call on the Lord thou shalt be forgiven and in his own due time thou shalt obtain them for now I had been tempted by the advisary and saught the Plates to obtain riches and kept not the conndame[n]t that I should have an eye single to the Glory of God therefore I was chastened and saught diligently to obtain the plates"

Harper further observed, based on insights from Joseph Knight, that receiving the plates was contigent on Joseph Smith's choice to "do right according to the will of God" within the next year, "he never would have them". Harper further states that the receiving of the plates depended on how well Joseph Smith responded to the messages God sent him through the messenger named Moroni.

It was on September 1827, where the Angel Moroni entrusted Joseph Smith with the plates. Per Harper's observation:

In September 1827, Joseph Smith, still far from perfect, had become not only willing but also able to make his eye single to God's glory and to become a choice seer and a great benefit to his fellow beings. Through sore temptations, difficult decisions, and repeated chastening by an angel, he had reached a turning point in his prophetic life. President Dallin H. Oaks described this process: "line upon line, young Joseph Smith expanded his faith and understanding and his spiritual gifts matured until he stood with power and stature as the Prophet of the Restoration (Recent Events Involving Church History and Forged Documents," Ensign, October 1987, p. 69).

Upon receiving these plates, Joseph Smith was able to translate them with teh assistance of a seer stone, dictating the text that would become the Book of Mormon to scribes.

The translation process was remarkable due to the claim of divine assistance and the witnesses attested to the plates physical existence. Eleven individuals signed testimonies regarding the witness of not only the plates, the translation process. Once the translation process was complete, Joseph Smith returned the plates to Moroni, and according to Joseph Smith's narrative, took them back to heaven for safe keeping. This signified the understanding that these plates were not intended to be perpetual but as a temporary vessel for unveiling sacred scripture.

Symbolism of the Plates in Latter-day Saint Faith

It is quite important to move beyond the physical object and delve into the symbolic significance of the Gold Plates to Latter-day Saint Christians. These plates symbolize and ground the profound work and mission of Joseph Smith's prophetic call and the Restoration of the Gospel of Christ. A profound and significant work that brought forth new scripture as another testament of Jesus Christ, his mission, purpose, and the atonement to where humanity may receive grace, forgiveness, and redemption.

The gold plates bridge modern believers to ancient prophets and their teachings. Such teachings preserved by divine intervention across centuries. Their narrative echoes broader biblical themes regardign sacred records. Take for example the tablets of Moses or the Ark of the Covenant, which were similarly temporary yet holding deep symbolism. The plates were not meant to be tangible relic for modern scrutiny; rather, they provide a framework in understanding Joseph Smith's divine mission.

Another aspect of the plates is how they challenge faith and spark introspection among people who are honest and judicious in reading the Book of Mormon. Take for instance the account of the disciple Thomas who doubted the testimony of the other ten disciples regarding the resurrection of Jesus Christ.

Then the same day at evening, being the first day of the week, when the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled for fear of the Jews, came Jesus and stood in the midst, and saith unto them, Peace be unto you. And when he had so said, he shewed unto them his hands and his side. Then were the disciples glad, when they saw the Lord. Then said Jesus to them again, Peace be unto you: as my Fahter hath sent me, even so send I you. And when he had said this, he breathed on them, and saith unto them, Receive the Holy Ghost: Whose soever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them; and whose soever sinsye retain, they are retained. But Thomas, one of the twelve, called Didymus, was not with them when Jesus came. The other disciples therefore said unto him, We have seen the Lord. But he said unto them, Except I shall see in his hands the print of the nails, and put my finger into the print of the nails, and thrust my hand into his side, I will not believe. And after eight days again his disciples were within, and Thomas with them: then came Jesus, the doors being shut, and stood in the midst, and said, Peace be unto you. Then saithin he to Thomas, Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and trhust it into my side: and be not faithless, but believing. And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord and My God. Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, htou hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen, yet have believed. (John 20:19-29, KJV)

Jesus Christ offered tremendous mercy and grace toward Thomas when he appeared a second time to the disciples. Knowing Thomas desired evidence of his resurrection, he confronted Thomas's doubts. What makes this significant is what Christ said regarding those who are blessed because their faith is not based on material evidence. Today, even the resurrection of Christ is challenged and criticized where the claim argues that there is no evidence exists of a physical resurrection. Yet, as Paul argued in 1 Corinthians 15, Christ's resurrection is the keystone to the Christian faith - without it - one's faith is in vain and useless (cf 1 Corinthians 15:12-19, KJV).

For us today - Christ is expressing that we are to stop doubting and believe the testimony of the Holy Spirit and the confirmation and testimony of others without prejudice and condemnation. Yet, it is our critics who want to sow doubt, cause confusion, and attempt to undermine the testimony and faith of Latter-day Saints. Therefore, the absence of the physical plates is only concerning for our critics who lack faith and understanding of God's plan for humanity. For Latter-day Saints, we are trusting in the spiritual evidence and personal witness of those who read, ponder, and live out the principles taught within the Book of Mormon. This also includes a testimony of Joseph Smith, the reality of the plates whereby Joseph Smith translated the Book of Mormon, and being transformed by the reading and studying of this sacred record. A transformation sparked by the true value of what lies in its message of hope - that Jesus is the Christ and through him, one receives grace, redemption, and salvation. Not through the bases of material evidence of whether or not the plates exist.

Additionally, many Christians place their faith - not in material evidence - they place their faith in spiritual affirmation and testimonies without physical evidence. Such is the case in trusting and believing that Christ truly rose from the dead physically. Given the reality there is no actual material or archaeological evidence suggesting the reality of a physical resurrection - only the testimonies of those who experienced such an event.

Addressing the Criticisms of Life After Ministry's Post

It is not uncommon for Latter-day Saints to read or hear criticisms regarding the narrative of the gold plates, the translation, and the narrative of Angel Moroni's visitation. Like many other counter-cult ministry groups, Life After Ministry consistently raise the same arguments, challenging the existence of the plates, reality of the Angel Moroni's visitation to Joseph Smith, and even questioning and criticizing the translation process of the Book of Mormon. Typically, they fall on the argument regading the lack of archaeological evidence to support the authenticity and historocity of the Book of Mormon. Let's examine the key issues the writer of the post Where are they Gold Plates? and see if they provide sound and reasonable objections.

Critique of the Plates Existence

Life After Ministry, like all other critics of the Latter-day Saint Christian Faith, claim that the plates were fabricated. This is typically assumed by citing absence of any phyiscal evidence. This dismissive attitude ignores the wealth of historical testimonies from those closest to Joseph Smith. Specifically, the eleven witnesses who publicly confirmed seeing or handling the plates.

Their testimonies are not vague or ambigious. Each individual gave witness to specific aspects of the plates description, engravings with intricate characters, and the gold-like appearance. Martin Harris faced faced personal and public ridicule for his testimony and declaration. Yet, he stood by his own personal testimony without waver or doubt. Such consistency among the witnesses, despite moments of personal apostasy and estrangement from Joseph Smith - adds substantial credibility. It begs the question: are all these accounts easily dismissed as conspiracy or delusional? It's a question our critics attempt to reason out.

Such fabrication theory does not hold when one considers the context of America in the 1820's. Ability to produce intricately engraved, metallic plates takes considerable skill, time, energy, and significant resources. Let alone - ability to do so secretively without anyone noticing. Such an advanced understanding of metallurgy, ancient languages, and significant resources was something Joseph Smith lacked.

Another issue is the narrative of what happened when Joseph Smith received the plates from the Angel Moroni. This account is recorded in Saints, Volume 1: 31-44. His story of Moroni's visitation and the nature of supposed gold plates seemed to be in circulation. If, according to the writer at Life After Ministry, that the visitation of Moroni and the Gold Plates merely existed in the mind of Joseph Smith, how is it that many wanted to seek out the plate for themselves, or even chased Joseph Smith through the woods:

After the fall harvest, Josiah Stowell and Joseph Knight traveled to the Manchester area on business. Both men knew that the fourth anniversary of Joseph's visit to the hill was at hand, and they were eager to know whether Moroni would finally trust him with the plates.

Local treasure seekers also knew it was time for Joseph to get the record. Lately one of them, a man named Samuel Lawerance, had been roaming the hill, searching for the plates. Worried that Samuel would cause trouble, Joseph sent his father to Samuel's house on the evening of September 21 to keep an eye on him and confront him if it looked like he was going to the hill.

Joseph then readied himself to retrieve the plates. His yearly visit to the hill was to take place the next day, but to keep ahead of the treasure seekers, he planned to arrive at the hill shortly after midnight - just as the morning of September 22 was beginning - when no one expected him to be out.

But he still needed to find a way to project the plates once he got them. After most of the family had gone to bed, he quietly asked his mother if she had a lockbox. Lucy did not have one and got worried.

What is interesting is that Emma went with Joseph and waited in the carriage while he went to retrieve the plates from the Angel Moroni. Upon the angelic visitation and retrieving the plates - Joseph was reminded to show the plates to no one except those the Lord appointed, promising him that the plates would be protected if he did all within his power ot preserve them.

According to the narrative:

"You will have to be watchful and faithful to your trust," Moroni told him, "or yu will be overpowered by wicked men, for they will lay every plan and scheme that is possible to get them away from you. And if you do not take heed continually, they will succeed."

Joseph carried the plates down the hill, but before he reched the carriage, he secured them in a hollow log where they would be safe until he obtained a lockbox. He then found Emma, and they returned home as the sun began to rise.

It was not until after Joseph Smith was able to retrieve and bring the plates home that treasure seekers attempted to steal the plates from him. Further narrative and historical records show that Joseph Smith consistently moved the plates around, hiding them from potential treasure seekers and curious neighbors.

What is telling is that if the plates and Moroni's various visitations were merely of Joseph Smith's fabrication and imagination - as the writer at Life After Ministries attempts to concude - how is it that treasure seekers and curious individuals consistently sought them out, requesting to pay in order to see them? One may argue that the motivations were to prove the plates existence - however, given the study of these historical narratives - those who sought out the plates were desiring to get gain from them. Something Moroni counseled Joseph Smith to avoid personally - and reason he had to meet annually for four years before retrieving them.

No one will consistently go after someone, or something of value, if they did believe such items did not exist. Imagine telling people you have something of great value at home and it sparks interest of many people to seek it out; mainly to take it for themselves. Those individuals will not spend time and energy to consistently come after you if there was no sustenance of truth to one's claim.

The Question of Archaeological Evidence

Another, albeit recurring, criticism is when they highlight the lack of archaeological evidence for the gold plates. The rests on the presupposition that the plates never actually existed. Either that, or no ancient civizilation wrote on any metal plates, especially gold like plates. However, archaeology is not always capable of providing absolute answers. In fact, the lack of archaeological evidence is not unique to the Book of Mormon.

When critics present the argument that there is a lack of, or zero archaeological, evidence to support the people, places, or even events written in the Book of Mormon (let alone the existence of the plates); it is always compared to the Bible and how it is supported by archaeology:

Sadly, the Mormon people will never see those plates to prove the existence of their god or even the ancient inhabitants of Mesoamerica. Unlike all the archaeological evidence that have been unearthed showing the existence of cities and people from the bible, nothing has ever been found to back up the stories in the Book of Mormon - not even a pottery shard.

There are two problems with this assumption. First, it negates an understanding of how archaeology actually works within a defined framework as it relates to the investigation and discovery of artifacts associated with ancient civilizations and people. Second, any evidence discovered within specific time periods does not transform to acceptance and belief. Here is what Faithful Answers, Informed Response (FAIR) shares:

Some people might suggest that finding the existence of horses or chariots would constitute proof for the Book of Mormon. This is doubtful. Finding such items would merely demonstrate that such things existed in the ancient New World, and while such discoveries may be consistent with the Book of Mormon, they hardly amount to "proof".

Another issue with the critic's argument, resting upon the idea that archaeology may prove the authenticity of the Book of Mormon, is that any evidence providing support is categorically dismissed. Instead, critics tend to move the goalposts in an ongoing discussion. Critics will change the rules and requirements as to what is acceptable archaeological evidence. By doing this, the critic hopes to present a situation where it is difficult answer their demands for evidence.

Not only do critics dismiss any plausible corrolation that offers credibility to the authenticity of the Book of Mormon, move the goalpost in what is deemed acceptable and irrefutable proof to the authenticity of the Book of Mormon, they tend to compare that the Bible has strong archaeological evidence to support it as authentic and true. From the plethora of New Testament manuscripts, to archaeological evidence supporting specific people, places, and even events written in the Bible. This type of argument is a blanket statement without sufficient understanding.

Understanding Archaeology and the Bible

First, critics make the assumption that all evidence, without question, is validation and proof of the Bible. However, they tend to forget that there is diverse interpretations regarding any archaeological findings related to the Bible. These findings may be interpreted differently by scholars that lead toward varying conclusions as to their relevance to the Biblical text. Where some scholars may see supportive evidence, others may view the same evidence as either inconclusive or contradictory.

Second, critics fail to understand the scope of the Bible when it comes to the broad range of historical, geographical, and cultural contexts that take place over centuries of the Ancient Near East. While there is strong evidence to support certain Biblical narratives, there is also less conclusive or no evidence supporting other Biblical narratives.

Third, concerns the very nature of evidence itself. Granted, archaeological evidence confirms the existence of places, people, or events mentioned within the Biblical text, however, it does not necessarily provide exact validation regarding theological or miraculous narrative details. While archaeological evidence provides historical accuracy of King David as a real person, the same evidence does not sufficiently affirm all biblical accounts involving him.

What this means is that archeology does exist to confirm over 50 individuals within given Biblical narratives. This includes kings and other officials. Along with this comes the historical accuracy regarding geography, customs, and identifiable historical figures. Regardless, significant portions of biblical narratives are less documented or non-existence. Take for instance the exact location of the Garden of Eden. While some assume probably locations within the Ancient Near East, no real archaeological evidence exists of an Angel standing guard with a flaming sword protecting the tree of life. Yet, many faithful Christians accept this without evidence.

Another example is the lack of evidence supporting a mass migration of a people from Egypt to the land of Canaan. According to the biblical narrative, it is estimated that 2 million Israelites left Egypt and journeyed into the Sinai desert under Moses. Certainly, if we accept the argument that the Bible has sufficient evidence to support it as credible and authentic - one certainly will find evidence to support such a mass migration. Unfortunately, there is no documented evidence supporting such a mass migration - given that a generation of Israelites had to pass away prior to the people were allowed to enter into Canaan.

Are we to consider that because there is a lack of evidence regarding such a mass migration that the Biblical narrative is to be dismissed? Furthermore, there is no sufficient evidence to prove that Egypt enslaved Hebrew people for 400 years. This is based on the following factors:

• Chronology: Different scholars debate the exact timeline of Hebrew enslavement, and the mass exodus, at differing periods. This timeline ranges from the Middle Kingdom to the New Kingdom.
• Archaeological Records: Direct archaeological evidence to support Ancient Hebrews to ancient Egypt as slaves, and time period of enslavement, is scant. Out of the abundance of Egyptian records discovered and trasnslated - none have distinct and clear documentation of an enslavement of people identifiable as Hebrews.
• City of Ramses and Pithom: The Biblical narrative explicitly mentions that the enslaved Hebrews built the store cities of Pithom and Ramses. It is assumed that this is connected to Pharaoh Ramesses II, suggesting a New Kingdom timeline for Hebrew enslavement. Yet, out of the abundance of archaeological evidence of Egypt - there is no direct support of Hebrews being enslaved and building these cities.
• Semites in Egypt: The discovery of the Brooklyn Papyrus lists several Semetic slaves in Egypt. Along with this, there is evidence of various Semetic peoples in Egypt working in a variety of capacities - which includes labor. Given this, the question is whether or not these Semetic people are Hebrew or another Semetic group.
• Plagues of Egypt: Probably one of the other distinct features of Hebrew enslavement and mass exodus is the divine plagues of Egypt. According to the Biblical Narrative, YHWH, through Moses, divinely interevened with a various plagues as judgment against Pharaoh. There are some who argue that these plagues were not divine in nature - and are a result of natural phenomena and natural disaster. From the Nile turning red due to a specific algea that resulted in the frogs, flies, and lice. These plagues resulted in pestilence and toxic bacteria that caused boils. As for the hail, locusts, and darkness - it is believed that a volcano, Thera, of the Mediterranean islands of Santorini, erupted 3500 years ago. One of the biggest volcanic eruptions (referred to as a plinial eruption) in human history. As a result, it impacted climate, caused the growth of locusts due to atmospheric release of water, and subsequent darkness due to the ash cloud blocking out the sunlight. Evidence for this is pumice found during excavations of Egyptian ruins despite there not being any volcanoes in Egypt. Analysis of the pumice shows the origination is the Santorini Volcano and the fallout having reached Egyptian shores.
• Pillar of Cloud by Day - Pillar of Fire by Night: Another aspect of the Exodus narrative is that the Israelites were guided by a pillar of cloud and fire. Again, scholars suggest that this was not something of divine nature. Instead, some suggest that the Israelites wandered the desert because they were following an actual volcano erupting - and it is suggested that this volcano was Mount Sinai. The very mountain Moses led Israelites too and then ascended to receive the commendments from God.

Point here is to show the incongruence of applying Biblical Archaeology as an end-all consensus for supporting the Bible as credible and then compare such evidence against the Book of Mormon. Doing so is intellectually dishonest. Holding to strict adherence to an archeological argument - our critics, who claim to be faithful Christians, ought to concede to dismiss certain Biblical narratives as false.

Again, due to lack of or no evidence to support those narratives. Critics are unwilling to use the same logic and criticism. For them, to deny certain biblical narratives entails to deny the inerrant and infallible word of God. It is an issue of black and white rigid thinking. Either the Bible is true and supported by archaeological evidence or it is entirely false where there is no archaeological evidence to support the totality of the Bible. It all comes down to faith without evidence.

Essentially, they have to concede the following:

• Biblical narrative of the geographical location of the Garden of Eden is ambiguous and no evidence presents a real paradasical garden with an Angel standing guard holding a flaming sword - therefore the Bible is false
• No physical or archaeological evidence exist of a Semitic Hebrew people were enslaved by Egypt and their mass exodus. Thus, the Bible is not credible and the story is fictitious.
• No physical evidence exist of people coming back to life after being in the grave for some time and most likely a concoction of literary ingenuity.

Here is an interesting note: mentioning this to critics as a response to their notion that becuase there is a lack of or no evidence to substantiate the Book of Mormon - they always fall on the sword of "you are attacking the authenticity of the Bible and deny its infallibity and truth" They do not realize that it is employing the very logic and criticsm used to dismiss and deny the authenticity of the Book of Mormon. In other words - they don't apply the same standard and logic in criticizing the Bible and the narratives contained therein.

Ancient Metallurgical and the Plates

The unique challenge the gold plates present correlates to their preservation and history. If, according to Latter-day Saint belief, the plates were returned to the angel Moroni - upon Joseph Smith's purpose in translating the record - then it becomes a moot point searching for physical remnants. Despite this, critics focus on wanting substantial evidence, that through divine design, was never intended to remain. Regardless, even if the records existed - the question remains - will critics still accept Joseph Smith and the Book of Mormon as authentic and credible? Most likely not.

One of the inherint difficulties associated with archaeological evidence and the gold plates is the nature in how ancient metallurgical artifacts are discovered. This is true when one considers areas without persistent excavation or in areas where errosion occurs due to certain climate. There are numerous civilizations that have passed where there is no written or recorded history. One reason may be do to assimiliation of cultures from one people group into another. Take for instance when the Conquestador's arrived to the New World. From historical records, one of the things that the conquestador's did was destroy the records of the people they encountered. Another is the renaming of certain areas from native languges and tongues to Spanish names.

The battle of Tenochtitlan (May 22-August 13, 1521) involved the Spanish army and indigenous allies coming against the Aztecs under Hernan Cortez. Tenochtitlan was renamed to Mexico and the colonization of Mesoamerica by Spanish conquistadors became New Spain.

Spanish conquestadors and Catholic priests who were present also burned many pre-Columbian codices as part of their efforts to destroy indigenous culutre and convert native peoples to Christianity. Much of these codices were made of bark paper or deerskin and painted with elaborate images and texts, recorded the history, beliefs, and customs of the Aztecs, Maya,s and other Mesoamerican civilizations. Reason for the Spainards burning these records was an attempt to eradicate the native religion and replace it with Christianity.

Destruction of ancient pre-Columbian codices resulted in the loss of valuable information of the indigenous culture. Not only that - it also had long lasting effects in how we are able to understand the historical culture and narratives of these civilizations.

The Catholic priests who accompanied the Spanish Conquestadors saw these codices as works of the devil and sought to destroy them in order to eradicate the native religion and replace it with Christianity.

The Spainards also saw the destruction of the codices as a way to assert their dominance and control over the native peoples and to demonstrate their superiority of Spanish culture and religion.

Destroying these records was not only a tragedy for the descendants of ancient Aztec, Mayan, and Inca cultures - it became a tragedy for humanity as a whole.

Along with the Spainards and Catholic priests destroying records, there was also the issue of taking metal artifacts, specifically anything gold, and melted down. Part of this was sent back to the Spanish Monarch as tax, and others were supposedly given as gifts to appease the Spainards. No one knows exactly how much and what type of gold artifacts Spainards taken and melted down.

Regardless, it comes back to the nature of faith. Not one that is based on evidence or archaeological evidence. It is a system of belief without evidence. Archaeology may help complement our understanding of historical cultures and people of ancient and sacred texts; it does not dictate spiritual truths. Essentially, critics asking for evidence for the existence of the gold plates to prove the authenticity of Joseph Smith's account and message of the Book of Mormon is misplaced and arrogant. The plates' divine purpose served as a medium to deliver the Book of Mormon's teachings - as another testament of Christ - and not an eternal exhibit for skeptical and critical eyes.

Evidence of Ancient Metal Plates Support Joseph Smith's Narrative

Critic's questioning, and skepticism, of the gold plates may cause some to experience a faith crisis. Questioning Joseph Smith's account and experience with the Angel Moroni and even questioning the 11 witnesses' testimony. However, there is an interesting aspect worth exploring regarding archaeology and evidence for metal plates. Ancient records written on metal plates, and preserved in peculiar ways, is not something of speculation and fanciful imagination. There is real, documented archaeological discoveries that parallel Joseph Smith's narrative of metal plates with ancient writings. This offers significant context to the plausibility of the Book of Mormon being of ancient origin and not a 19th century construct.

Discoveries of Metal Records in Antiquity

The Darius plates from Persia stand out as a prime example of metal plates inscribed with writing. Unearthed from the Achaemenid Empire, these artifacts were made of gold and silver, inscribed with royal decrees and dated approximately around the 6th century BCE - roughly around the same time as Nephi records making his records on metal plates. These plates are described as being bound by metal rings, thin in metal, with small iconographic engravings that comprise 6 metal sheets.

Bronze plates from the Temple Dodona in ancient Greece have inscribed prophetic inscriptions. And lead plates recently found in Jordan, bearing inscriptions thought to date back to early Christianity. In fact, pre-Columbian copper and gold plates have been uncovered, particularly in the Andean and Mesoamerican sites.

What these findings suggest is that there is a demonstrative history where durable materials like metal were used in preserving sacred or legal texts as part of ancient practices. So, when critics attempt to argue that there exists an "unlikelihood" of Joseph Smith's claims, it is worth asking - are they ignoring or dismissing archaeological and historical precedence related to the discoveries of metal plates?

Use of Stone Boxes in Ancient Cultures

When Joseph Smith was guided to the Hill Cumorah - he describes the plates, and other artifacts, hidden in a stone box. Something that may sound strange to 19th-century perspective and understanding. However, archaeological evidence suggests that Joseph Smith's description of a stone box is nothing new in Ancient cultural context. Stone boxes, or other similar enclosures, were frequently used to protect sacred or valuable items from decay. The Darius plates mentioned earlier were not merely laying around - they were stored in a sealed stone container, designed to last for centuries.

While not contained in stone box, the Dead Sea Scrolls were placed in clay and stone jars and hidden in desert caves. And the Ugaritic texts, written on clay tablets (while not metal plates) were only discovered in a tomb by a farmer in Ras Shamra. This discovery was in 1928, predating the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls between 1946 and 1956.

The practicality of stone containers rests on the knowledge of protection and preservation of ancient records. Protection and preservation from water, pests, and natural erosion. This begs the question - why wouldn't the gold plates benefit from the same kind of preservation? Such notion aligns well with what we know about ancient societies and their methods of safeguarding knowledge.

Durability and Practicality of God Plates

Utilizing gold as a metal for recording important texts suggests its durability and practicality. God was not merely valued for its unique physical properties; it makes for a logical choice for recording important texts. Consider the Voyager Golden Record that contains 117 images and a variety of sounds. Selected by a committee headed up by Carl Sagen for NASA, this intergalactic "message in a bottle" is a 12-inch phonograph record that is gold plated copper disk. I mention this due to the practicality and durability of recording text.

Unlike other metals, gold resists tarnish, oxidation, and corrosion. Additionally, its malleability allows for detailed engraving, making gold an ideal medium in preserving intricate writings.

Despite this, critics often dismiss the idea of gold plates as impractical. One such impractical criticism is the false notion that critics presume that the plates Joseph Smith described present an implausibility of being carried, running from individuals seeking to obtain them. They argue that such an artifact may weigh up to 200 plus pounds. They infer that the plates were made of pure gold.

Herein lies the issue - they dismiss the narrative that most likely refers to the gold plates as being gold in appearance yet made of some metal alloy with gold covering. Most likely a copper alloy. Again, the Voyager Gold Record is not actually pure gold, it is a copper alloy with gold covering. And contrary to critics claim of the gold plates - if they existed by their assertion - weighing around 200 some pounds; realistically, the plates most likely weighed around 40-60 lbs.

Regardless, another issue critics dismiss is the rich symbolic meaning. In ancient texts and cultures, gold symbolized divinity, purity, and eternal value. Considering the sacred intent of the plates, a reasonable understanding is that the plates were preserved because of the sacred nature contained within them.

Logical Fallacies in Anti-Latter-day Saint Arguments

One of the common aspects of the argument's critics, like the writer at Life After Ministries, presents is a logical fallacy called argument from silence. A type of argument where an inference is made that because there appears to be absence of any statements or historical documentation - the event or fact is not true. This implication where the lack of evidence of the plates, or historical and archaeological evidence proves that the Book of Mormon is not credible, and Joseph Smith is supposedly a fraud.

Another fallacy utilized by critics, and evident in the post by Life After Ministries, is one called false dilemma or false dichotomy. Here, critics assume that because there is a lack of evidence supporting the historicity of the Book of Mormon is false; they turn and argue that the Bible is supported by historical, archaeological, and other supporting evidence.

Arguing from silence and false dilemma fallacies is utilized to dismiss the wealth of historical testimonies of those individuals closest to Joseph Smith. It also pits the need to have physical and material evidence before believing something to be true over faith. The reality is that nowhere is it prescribed that a person needs to have physical and material evidence prior to believing something to be true or not. In fact, to make such an assumption undermines the reality of individuals testimony. Meaning, if one requires a physical manifestation of Christ having been physically resurrected prior to believing in God and seeking redemption and salvation - most people will not come to faith and follow Christ. This is exactly the argument used by critics like Life After Ministries - in order to believe the Book of Mormon and Joseph Smith's account of the Angel Moroni's visitation and receiving the plates from him - they need to see physical evidence.

It also begs the question - even if there exists substantial archaeological evidence, evidence of the plates very existence - does not necessitate a movement to accept it faithfully. Individuals will always attempt to find a way to dismiss and discredit such evidence.

Lastly, the argument that the Angel Moroni and the plates themselves being fabricated by Joseph Smith, does not hold up when an honest examination of the context of the 1820's of America is considered. For instance, to produce intricately engraved, metallic plates of this size requires advanced knowledge and understanding of metallurgy, access to significant resources, and dedicated time. All maintaining a high level of secrecy. All of which Joseph Smith lacked at that time. Applying standard rules of logic exposes the inconvenient truth regarding our critic's claims. Namely, their premise and arguments fall short and are intellectually dishonest. Exposing them to be lacking credibility and integrity.

Strawmanning Latter-day Saint Doctrine

Another fallacy critics, like Life After Ministry, consistently employ is creating a straw man argument. They do this in a manner that distorts and presents a bias and prejudicial version of the beliefs in order to easily dismantle and attack such beliefs. In the case of the gold plates, the writer at Life After Ministry portrays the gold plates as an object Latter-day Saints hinge their entire faith on. This suggests that without any tangible proof, our faith and testimony collapse. This is disingenuous and misrepresents Latter-day Saint Faith and teachings entirely.

The plates merely served a divine and temporary purpose - to bring about the message of the Book of Mormon as a testament to the reality of who Christ is, the plan of redemption and salvation for humanity, and how to draw closer to God. One's faith in the Book of Mormon is not the evidence of the gold plates, one's faith in the Book of Mormon is how it transforms one's life. This is succinctly summed up in Moroni 10:1-23.

False Dilemma Between Archaeologies

As mentioned earlier, critics like Life After Ministries tend to compare the presupposed lacking, or zero, evidence of archaeological evidence for the Book of Mormon with that of evidence supporting the Bible. This is known as the fallacy of False Dilemma or False Dichotomy. It is assuming that there are only two possibilities. For the critics, the two possibilities are that either there is sufficient evidence to prove the authenticity of the Book of Mormon or there is not and therefore disproving it.

Critics argue that because Biblical archaeology has yielded certain evidence, the Book of Mormon ought to have the same type of evidence before any consideration of it being valid and credible. This tends to oversimplify situations and ignores differences in historical and cultural contexts.

The Bible and the Book of Mormon are different sacred texts that emerge from vastly different civilizations. The Biblical narratives center in regions where continuous habitation and archaeological study has been prominent. Whereas the ancient cultures of the Americas often left few lasting footprints in climates less conducive to preservation. Comparing the two directly is akin to comparing apples to oranges and claim that because an orange is not an apple it is therefore not a fruit.

Another aspect of the conversation critics fails to consider is how the Book of Mormon describes events that predate European colonization and significant technological developments in the Americas. Expecting identical evidence for both records ignore these nuances. A way to shift away from this binary thinking rests upon the question regarding how other cultural or historical contexts may support the plausibility of the gold plates. Instead, it ought to be an invitation to explore faith, history, and belief systems rather than rely solely on binary "proof". Meaning, critics argue from an atheistic point of view; "Prove that God actually exists and then I will believe". In this context - critics literally are asking: "Prove that the plates are real and there is evidence to support the people, places, and events recorded in the Book of Mormon and then I will accept and believe".

My question - if there did not exist any evidence to support the Bible - are you willing to still believe it to be divinely inspired? Critics won't answer that question, and if they do - tend to focus on the reality that it is not evidence that ought to build up faith. Similarly, they don't hold to the same rule and reasoning that one ought to have faith when it comes to the Book of Mormon without basing it on evidence.

When critics employ logical fallacies - it merely serves to muddy the water of discussion and detracts from meaningful discussions. Employing discernment and recognizing these tactics in arguments against Latter-day Saint beliefs helps us to refocus the conversation on sincerity, understanding, and respect. However, critics often rely more on flawed arguments and not concerning themselves with sincerity, understanding, and respect. They either want to cause derision, confusion, faith crisis, and sow seeds of doubt under the guise of leading Latter-day Saints to the "Real" Jesus.

Conclusion

Where are the Gold Plates? What does it matter and what does it have to do with genuine and authentic faith? Nothing because the gold plates are far more than historical artifact. They symbolize divine intervention and the sacred mission of Joseph Smith and the Restoration of the Gospel in these last days. Despite critics' narrow focus on questioning the whereabouts and existence of the gold plates - the plates purpose was never to remain as proof for skeptics. The plates only served as a conduit for the testimony and truthfulness of the Gospel, of Christ, and the teachings contained within the Book of Mormon.

Faith - from a Latter-day Christian perspective - thrives not on material evidence alone. Evangelical Christians ought to agree on this point. If they do not - which is evidenced in how critics like Life After Ministry raises - then what point is there one to exercise faith?

A more appropriate question - and one which I invite the writer and those associated with Life After Ministry, and other Evangelical Christians - to consider is this: How do we engage in the truths the Book of Mormon establishes about Christ, his teachings, and living the Gospel where one is drawn closer to God?