Part One | Challenging Sixbert Sangwa: Addressing His Dishonest and Passive Aggressive Perspective on Latter-day Saint Christian Beliefs

 

Jesus Speaking with his Disciples.
All Rights Reserved - Timothy R. Berman

Introduction

In Matthew 16:16-17, we witness a pivotal moment in the life of Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ. The Savior poses two crucial questions to the disciples: "Who do men say that I am?" and "Who do you say that I am?" These questions remain profoundly relevant today: Who is Jesus Christ? Peter's profound response, "Thou art the Christ, Son of the Living God," was not simply a learned answer but a revelation from the Father in heaven (Matthew 16:17).

This revelation serves as the foundation of truth on which Christ's Church is built, emphasizing the importance of personal testimony and revelation in understanding the Savior. While it is valuable to comprehend Christ's attributes and nature, true understanding comes through personal revelation and aligning it with the teachings of the scriptures. This underscores the significance of seeking our own personal testimony of who Jesus Christ is.

Today, critics continue to try to tear down and mock the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and our beliefs about Jesus Christ. They often wrongly claim that we believe in a different Jesus than the one in the Bible. This pattern is common among Evangelical Christians, from pastors and ministers to regular churchgoers, despite these arguments being already disproven.

BECOME A PATREON SPONSOR TO READ FULL ARTICLE

1 Nephi 8 – Weathering Life’s Storms with the Anchor of God’s Word

 

Photo by Casey Horner on Unsplash

Christ’s call to “Be ye therefore perfect” (Matthew 5:48) in the sermon on the mount sets an immense challenge, yet one rooted in profound love. Perfection requires immense personal growth and sacrifice – denying ourselves, taking up our cross as Christ taught (Matthew 16:23-26). The path is narrow, the way difficult (Matthew 7:13-14), but Christ doesn’t ask this of us flippantly. He knows the struggles we’ll face amid the mists of darkness. That’s why in the Book of Mormon’s sublime vision of the Tree of Life, the love of God is symbolized by the most “desirable” fruit imaginable. The iron rod represents Christ’s word to cling to when the wide way seems easier. Though perfection seems impossible amid our weakness, Christ’s perfect love provides the strength we need. If we endure to the Tree of Life, the fruit of eternal life awaits – a gift from the perfect Father who simply asks us to keep trying, keep growing, keep holding to the rod of His truth. It’s a journey of a million footsteps, but one made possible through the grace of the one who is himself the Way.

The Savior’s love is a profound experience that transcends mere words. It manifests when we hold fast to our beliefs, pressing forward with unwavering faith and obedience to the teachings revealed through sacred scriptures and modern-day prophets and apostles. Lehi’s vision becomes our personal pilgrimage, a journey towards a new life – a life we can embrace in the present moment as we grow and mature in our faith. It is a progression towards immortality and eternal life, where we attain the fullness of true spiritual perfection. This path is not merely a distant promise but a tangible reality, accessible to those who wholeheartedly embrace the Savior’s teachings and walk in His footsteps. It is a transformative experience that imbues our lives with purpose, hope, and an abiding sense of peace that transcends earthly trials and tribulations.

READ THE FULL POST HERE

Embracing Forgiveness: Lessons from 1 Nephi 7:6-21

 

Forgiveness, especially in the context of abuse, is undoubtedly challenging. Many of us grappling with trauma carry burdens of shame, guilt, and a profound sense of powerlessness inflicted by those who’ve harmed us—be it emotionally, spiritually, or physically. It’s even more complex when the individuals in question are family members, which adds layers of complexity to our emotional ties and experiences.

The idea that forgiveness is necessary might be universally understood yet putting it into practice is another story. It involves a humbling journey of self-reflection, recognizing our emotional responses, and grappling with feelings of bitterness and resentment that bind us. Holding onto these emotions often feels like being locked in an emotional prison, where statements like “They don’t deserve my forgiveness!” become the bars that confine us.

Throughout my own journey, I have leaned on both spiritual insights and personal reflections. For instance, the scriptural account in 1 Nephi 7:6-21 has been instrumental in guiding my understanding of forgiveness. It illustrates how Nephi manages to forgive his brothers despite their mistreatment. This passage underscores the profound spiritual and personal growth that can emerge from the act of forgiving.

BECOME A PATREON SPONSOR TO READ FULL ARTICLE

Yes, Latter-day Saints are True Christians

 

 According to Life After Ministries, Latter-day Saints can't be true Christians. 

Are Mormons True Christians? Today we’re looking at a subject in the Gospel Topic Section of the LDS website.

I’ve become quite enamored with how the Bible provides answers to topics that speak directly to contemporary issues for us today. It’s a reminder that God obviously knew beforehand!

Notice in their statement they make the accusation that sincere seekers of truth will accept their variant belief.

What the LDS Church ignores is that freedom to worship as you please don’t mean you’re exempt from following rules. If you’re not worshiping the right Jesus, it still means you’re not Christian, regardless of what freedoms you may or may not have.

Pray for God to open their hearts to this truth!

The writer of this post quotes 1 Timothy 4:1-2 as a so-called proof text. They continue with a quote from one of the Gospel Topic Essays published at the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Website (Which the link appears to be broken). 

And then there is this comment posted by Glenn E. Chattfield: 

Definitely not true Christianity and is NOT “consistent with early Christianity.” Early, true Christianity has a Creator God who created everything from nothing while the Mormon god used pre-existing matter. Early, true Christianity has a Christ born from a virgin while Mormonism has a Christ born from sexual relations. Early, true Christianity has an eternal God who is a spirit while Mormonism has a man-god who worked his way to godhood. Etc, etc, etc.

This type of shotgun fallacy is an unfortunate and pedestrian attempt to further the false claim and highly promoted confirmation bias. It also is prone to strawman argumentation where these types of Evangelical Christians attempt to establish a false and misrepresented notion in order to answer that claim and assertion. 

So, what defines a true Christian? Is it particular adherence to traditional teachings, doctrines, creeds, and confessions? According to many of our critics - yes, a person is not a true Christian if they deny the Trinity (a Three person in one being God as established by various creeds and confessions). However, this is a new idea that took the term Christian and redefined it for their own purpose and usage.

A good book published in 1997 was written by Craig L. Bloomberg and Stephen E. Robinson titled How Wide The Divide where Bloomberg is an Evangelical Christian and Robinson is a Latter-day Saint. 

1828 Webster's Dictionary

When you look at the older dictionaries for the definition of Christian - one does not find the added definition of recent dictionaries. According to the 1828 Webster's Dictionary (available online), the term Christian defines the character, attitude, and behavior of an individual who follows the teachings of Jesus Christ. Based on this simple definition, yes - Latter-day Saints are Christians because of the character, attitude, and behavior most display in their faith regarding the teachings of Jesus Christ. 

What Christ Taught Matters

Since many Evangelicals (and many of those who are critics of the LDS Faith) rest their authority and understanding on the Bible. So, what does Christ teach in relation to the question? And there is specific things Christ actually does teach that manifest in whom he declared are His true disciples and followers. 

The Beatitudes - Pathway toward Spiritual Growth and Perfection

Our first scripture focuses on the Beatitudes and how this relates to the question. Christ lays this out in Matthew 5. He further expounds on this in the Sermon on the Mount (Comprises Matthew 5-7). In my NASB Thompson Chain Reference Study Bible there is an image of a typical Roman Temple on pg. 4222. The steps leading up to this temple are based on Matthew 5:3-12. Each step reflects each of the Blessed are those... statements. 

• Humility - Matthew 5.3
• Contrition - Matthew 5.4
• Gentleness - Matthew 5.5
• Spiritual Hunger - Matthew 5.6
• Mercifulness - Matthew 5.7
• Purity - Matthew 5.8
• Peacemaking - Matthew 5.9
• Sacrificial Suffering - Matthew 5.10-12

The image of The Temple of Truth - Christ's Sermon on the Mount also shows 27 Pillars holding up the roof. Each pillar representing each component of the Sermon on the Mount. And on pg. 1667 outlines the Beatitudes of Christ as found in Matthew 5:7-12. 

In a post written at the Catholic Exchange BR. James Brent observes how the beatitudes is seen as the process and development of Christian faith, growth, and spiritual Journey. Brent opens with how St. Thomas Aquinas had curated much of the Patristic Father's teachings regarding the Beatitudes in the Catena Aurea. 

This appears quite consistent with a post over at Zondervan Academic regarding the Beatitudes: 

The Beatitudes also have special instructional value for his disciples. The qualities that exemplified the godly person in the Old Testament are now made an eschatological reality with the arrival of the kingdom of God. These qualities will accompany the transformation that occurs in the life of each disciple as each submits to the operation of kingdom life through the Spirit. In the Beatitudes, and indeed in the Sermon on the Mount as a whole, the emphasis is on a righteousness that begins with the transformation of the inner life and then moves to conform external behavior to inward values.

Based on this understanding of the Beatitudes, we see Latter-day Saint teaching reflect the same idea. In his 1977 April General Conference address, Royden G. Derrick shares this: 

The more experience I gain in teaching the restored gospel of Jesus Christ, the more I am impressed with the concept of the Beatitudes shared by a friend years ago which deserves a more broad exposure. Each of the Beatitudes represents a specific step in our orderly progression towards perfection, and teaches us how to qualify ourselves for exaltation, for the Bible concludes the chapter on the Beatitudes with the words, “Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.” (Matt. 5:48.)

In his BYU Devotional, given on May 20, 1986, Robert E. Wells shares this: 

These are startling and attention-grabbing contradictions. Who needs problems if these are blessings? These declarations are not quiet philosophical stars in a summer night. Rather, the Beatitudes of Christ are lightning bolts and thunder claps of spiritual surprise! Please review them with me as a list of Christ-like attributes we should each seek to develop.

It is the last part of Wells statement that gives us the understanding that a true Christian is one who develops certain Christ-like attributes. These attributes not only define us as Christians, but they also define our own spiritual journey and path of discipleship. 

We are to deny ourselves and take up our Cross every day

Another teaching of Christ, that helps us understand what it means to be a true Christian, is what he required of each of us. This is found in Matthew 16:24-28. A passage where Christ declares two things. First, we are to deny ourselves. Secondly, we are to take up our cross if we are wanting to commit to following him:

Then Jesus said to his disciples, "if anyone wants to come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me. For whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life on account of me will find it. For what will a person be benefited if he gains the whole world but forfeits his life? Or what will a person give in exchange for his life?

Regarding this passage, the idea of taking up a cross in the First century meant certain death. Not only certain death, but it also meant ridicule, humiliation, and suffering. It is the very means that our Savior himself experienced. Today, we do not have the threat of imminent crucifixion that was prominent within the First Century. Thus, the reference takes on a whole new understanding where it refers to our absolute and radical surrender unto Christ in order to follow Him. If we are not willing to deny ourselves (our present attitudes, behaviors, beliefs, perspectives, will, desire, and all things pertaining to the desires of the flesh) we are incapable of following Christ. We see this in the dialogue Christ has with the rich young ruler (Matthew 19:16) where Christ called for the young man to forsake all his worldly possession, affluence, and wealth. Only to distribute it to the poor and follow Christ. Something the young man was not willing or capable of doing. 

Are you willing to forsake all things for Christ?

Speaking on the passage of Matthew 16 and the Rich Young Ruler, the conversation turns from this to Christ making an interesting statement in response to Peter's inquiry: 

Then Peter answered and said to him, "Behold, we have left everything and followed you. What then will there be for us?" And Jesus said to them, I truly say to you that in the renewal of the world, when the Son of Man sits on his glorious throne, you who have followed me - you also will sit on twelve thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel. And everyone who has left houses or brothers or sisters or father or mother or wife or children or fields on account of my name will receive a hundred times as much, and will inherit eternal life. (Matthew 19:27-29). 

A true Christian is called to forsake all things (another form of denying himself). One of my favorite classic pieces of Christian Literature is that of John Bunyan's The Pilgrims Progress where the main character (Christian) goes on a spiritual pilgrimage and quest to find salvation. 

The invitation here is for us to make necessary sacrifices in order to follow Him. This is where faithful obedience comes. If we give ourselves over to the will and desire of God, seeking His purpose and will - we are called to make necessary sacrifices. Sometimes this may be small gestures and sacrifices. However, in some cases, it may literally mean leaving all that we know behind in order to embrace and follow His teachings as true disciples. Many who do come to faith end up having to forsake family in order to follow Christ. 

What it means to be Born Again

Christ entertained Nicodemus and their conversation is recorded in the third chapter of the Gospel of John. It is the most oft quoted passages of Scripture regarding the invitation of being born again. And typically, it is the only passage reflecting Christ's teaching on the subject of discipleship and salvation that Christians turn to when evangelizing others. Specifically, the tendency appears to focus on a certain verse - isolating it from the overarching context of the discussion. 

The oft quote passage is that of John 3:16 - For in this way God loved the world, slo that he gave his one and only Son, in order that everyone who believes in him will not perish, but will have eternal life. What is interesting is that many evangelical Christians make the claim that to properly interpret scripture, we ought to allow scripture to interpret scripture. So, what is Christ referring to here in relation to those who believe on Him? It goes back that belief is not enough. Simply to confess and say one believes in Christ is not enough for them to become true disciples. One ought to go back to what the conversation was focusing on. 

Christ taught Nicodemus that a person needs to be born again. This idea is followed up with two aspects of how this new birth is accomplished: 

Jesus answered and said to him, "Truly, truly I say to you, unless someone is born from above, he is not able to see the kingdom of God." Nicodemus said to him, "how can a man be born when he is an old man? he is not able to enter into his mother's womb for the second time and be born, can he? (John 3:2-4, LEB). 

Jesus appears to answer this question: "Jesus answered, "Truly, truly I say to you, unless someone is born of water and spirit he is not able to enter into the kingdom of God." 

Unfortunately, many Christians hold to part of this regarding a person experiencing a spiritual awakening or rebirth (regeneration according to Reformed Theology). They negate the other component associated with this spiritual awakening and new birth and that of the water. Christ has in mind the essence of cleansing. Nicodemus, being a Jew, most likely understood this. Today, we also understand this on multiple levels. God cleansed the earth with a flood whereby Noah, his family, and animals were saved. A king plagued with leprosy was instructed by a Prophet of God to immerse himself in the river Jordan seven times to receive healing and cleansing. Furthermore, the miracle of Christ at the pool of Bethsaida holds to the reference of a sense of cleansing by the water. 

When Peter was asked by the crowd, who were pricked in their hearts, on what is required of them. Peter instructed them to repent of their sins (and in the context, the conviction and pricking of the hearts of those hearing Peter stems from Peter's accusation against them of crucifying Christ) and to be baptized: 

Now when they heard this, they were pierced to the heart and said to Peter and the other apostles, "What should we do, men and brothers?" And Peter said to them, Repent and be baptized, each one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. (Acts 2:37-38, LEB). 

This is consistent with the Great Commission Christ gave to the disciples: 

And Jesus approached and spoke to them, saying, "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Therefore, go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them all to observe everything I have commanded you, and behold,. I am with you all the days until the end of the age." (Matthew 28:16-20). 

Christ instructed the disciples to go and preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ unto all people and nations. Bring them into a place of discipleship. And how that is accomplished is baptizing them for the remission of their sins and then teaching them to observe all that Christ commanded of the disciples. 

Here, we see discipleship coupled with baptism by immersion for the remission of sins and instructing individuals to walk in faithful obedience to all that Christ taught and commanded. 

Living Sacrifices

Closing up his epistles to the Church in Rome, the Apostle Paul writes the following: 

Therefore I exhort you, brothers, through the mercies of God, to present your bodies as living sacrifices, holy and pleasing unto God, which is your reasonable service. And do not be conformed to this age, but be transformed by the renewal of y our mind, so that you may approve that which is good and well-pleasing and perfect will of God. (Romans 12:1-2, LEB). 

What is good and well-pleasing and perfect will of God? To follow Christ and his teachings, to become true disciples through our own willingness to deny ourselves, forsake those things that may present a barrier in faithfully obeying God's will and purpose in our lives, enter into covenantal relationship with Christ through baptism, and receive the gift of the Holy Spirit as a constant guide for personal revelation. 

Yes, Latter-day Saints are True Christians

Despite the many claims of our critics within the Evangelical and Protestant Christian community, Latter-day Saints are Biblically defined as true Christians and disciples of Christ. To claim that we are not means to deny the teachings of Christ on what is required and needed to be considered a disciple of His. Nowhere in the Bible does it prescribe any notion of following creeds, confessions, or doctrinal teachings. This is one that goes back to the attitude and behavior of the Pharisees and Sadducees of the First Century. 

And to deny the teachings of Christ is not actually Christian in any way shape or form. It is considered Anti-Christ. Thus, when critics, like the writer at Life After Ministry, makes this claim over and over again - they are really denying the very Bible they claim to understand. They further deny the very Christ they claim to follow. 

Romans 9:10-11 in Context: Reconciling with Latter-day Saint Christian Teachings on Pre-existence

Photo by Timothy Eberly on Unsplash | Commercial Use Allowed

In this comprehensive exploration, we will unravel the intricate tapestry of the Latter-day Saint doctrine of Pre-existence and its correlation with Romans 9:10-11. By examining the scriptural framework and historical context, we aim to unveil the profound harmony between these profound teachings, offering a greater appreciation for both the unity and diversity of God's eternal plan.

The recent discussion on how Latter-day Saint Christians reconcile the doctrine of Pre-existence with Romans 9:10-11 has sparked a lot of interest. This conversation took place in the LDS & Bible-believing Christian Discussion Group on Facebook. The individual who initially asked the question did not provide a doctrinal framework for their interpretation or perspective. It's assumed that this individual, who appears to be an admin for the group, may adhere to the doctrine of Predestination, which is held by proponents of Reformed theology, specifically Calvinism. The discussion and evidence presented aim to address how the doctrine of Pre-existence aligns with Romans 9:10-11.

The post includes actual screenshots from the group discussion alongside commentary. It's up to the reader to determine the validity and credibility of whether the original question was answered with sound and reasonable evidence.

Jon Clark:

"My understanding is that Mormon doctrine teaches that souls are eternal and live in a pre-existence prior to birth. 

For people who believe this doctrine, how do you explain Romans 9:10-11? 

"And not only that, but there was also Rebekah, when she had conceived twins by one man, our father Isaac; for though the twins were not yet born and had not done anything good or bad, so that God's purpose according to His choice would stand, not because of works but because of Him who calls."  

My Response:

Simple, Paul is writing to Roman Christians who are Jews. He is reminding them of the covenants God had made with Abraham and then with Jacob, and then with Moses. God's choosing of making a Covenant with Jacob and not Esau had nothing to do with their volition. God already had purpose in establishing Israel as YHWH's inheritance (cf Deuteronomy 32:8-9). This covenant was to establish the chosen lineage through which the messiah will be birthed from. And this was already established in the Pre-existence and God's plan of redemption. Paul was well aware of the doctrine of the Pre-existence as a learned Pharisee and Jew. This is also encapsulated in the Babylonian Talmud and the Bereshit as to six things having either been created or come into existence prior to the creation of the world and humanity. 

Jon Clark

Timothy Berman, 

-- "Paul is writing to Roman Christians who are Jews."

Rome is and was a mix of cultures. Both Jews and Gentiles lived (and live) in Rome. 

-- "He is reminding them of the covenants God had made with Abraham and then with Jacob, and then with Moses"

Where is God reminding anyone of the covenants in the passage I cited? There's literally no mention of any covenants anywhere.

-- "Paul was well aware of the doctrine of the pre-existence as a learned pharisee and jew." 

An argument from silence. 

-- "This is also encapsulated in the Babylonian Talmud and the Bereshit as to six things having either been created or come into existence prior to the creation of the world and humanity."

So? The Babylonian Talmud does what exactly to prove spiritual truth?

CFM | Strengthen Your Testimony Through 1 Nephi 2: Turning to the Lord

Lehi’s Family Leaving Jerusalem, by Scott Snow

Years ago, I came to know a gentleman while I was homeless, relying on the Catholic Community Services agency in Bellevue, Washington. This agency had a program that allowed people like me to have a place to stay for the night, rotating among different churches each month. This gentleman shared his story with me, recounting how he felt the Lord's call to give up everything and follow Him. He told me how, through his faithful obedience, he received blessings in small, meaningful ways. His story reminded me of the main character, Christian, in John Bunyan's "The Pilgrim's Progress," who, after realizing impending destruction, embarks on a personal journey. Like Christian, I had tried several times in my life to follow Christ, facing difficult challenges each time. It took years for me to understand that these challenges were divine tests designed to draw me closer to God. Yet, I was stubborn and obstinate, relying solely on my own resources and efforts, instead of surrendering fully to His will. This revelation changed my life, teaching me the profound lesson that true growth and blessings come through faithful obedience and trust in God.

In the midst of life's uncertainties, turning to the Lord can be the cornerstone of fortifying your spiritual foundation. 1 Nephi 2 teaches us that by seeking the Lord’s guidance and trusting in His plan, we can gain and strengthen our testimony. This scripture illustrates Nephi's unwavering faith and his journey of spiritual growth as he chooses to follow God's commandments despite challenges. By immersing yourself in this chapter, you’ll discover how aligning with the Lord can enrich your spiritual understanding and empower you to face life's trials with a steadfast heart. Dive into the teachings of 1 Nephi 2 and witness the transformative power of genuine faith.

Nephi is known for his strong faith in the Lord, but he had to work to gain his testimony, just like all of us. In 1 Nephi 2, you can see why Nephi was able to believe his father's words. Why didn't Laman and Lemuel have this same belief? (See also 1 Nephi 15:2–11). When have you felt the Lord change your heart?

BECOME A PATREON MEMBER TO READ FULL ARTICLE

BECOME A PAID SUBSCRIBER AT MINDFUL LATTER-DAY SAINT CHRISTIAN LIVING

CFM | Inductive Study: The Great Worth of the Word of God in 1 Nephi 1-5

 

The Book of Mormon starts with the story of a real family facing real challenges. Although it took place in 600 BC, many aspects of their experience can resonate with modern families. This family lived in a corrupt society, but the Lord assured them that if they followed Him, He would guide them to safety. Throughout their journey, they experienced highs and lows, received great blessings and witnessed miracles, but also encountered disagreements and conflicts. Few scriptures provide such a detailed account of a family striving to live the gospel: parents trying to instill faith and worrying about their family's safety, children deciding whether to trust their parents' beliefs, and siblings grappling with jealousy and conflicts—sometimes finding forgiveness. This family's story offers a powerful example of faith in the face of imperfection.

The notion that the word of God is "of great worth" resonates deeply with me, especially as I reflect on the teachings in the Book of Mormon, specifically 1 Nephi 1–5. The value of the scriptures is vividly illustrated through the experiences of Lehi’s family. For instance, in 1 Nephi 1:11-15, Lehi’s vision and subsequent preaching are direct outcomes of his engagement with the word of God, bringing him profound spiritual insight and purpose. In 1 Nephi 3:19-20, the necessity of the brass plates, containing the words of God, underscores their importance for preserving commandments and guiding the family in their journey. The transformation in their lives, as seen in 1 Nephi 5:10-22, shows that immersing themselves in God’s word brought them joy, understanding, and a sense of direction. These scriptures affirm that God’s word is not just a historical record but a living source of guidance, comfort, and inspiration. They encourage me to search the scriptures more diligently, knowing that they hold answers and revelations that are vital for my spiritual well-being and personal growth. This realization compels me to view the word of God as an indispensable treasure, urging constant study and reflection.

In our fast-paced world, grasping the profound significance of God's word can seem challenging. Yet, through an inductive study method, we uncover timeless truths embedded in sacred texts. The books of 1 Nephi 1-5 impart pivotal teachings about the immense value of the Word of God. These chapters reveal not only divine guidance but also inspire unwavering faith in adversity. Our exploration of this scripture provides invaluable insights for anyone seeking to deepen their spiritual understanding and appreciation of God's teachings.

BECOME A PATREON MEMBER TO ACCESS FULL ARTICLE

BECOME A PAID SUBSCRIBER AT MINDFUL LATTER-DAY SAINT CHRISTIAN LIVING

Unveiling the Criticism and Accusation of Plagiarism in the Book of Mormon

INTRODUCTION

The notion and argument that Joseph Smith plagiarized from the King James Version has been long standing and a subject of debate among scholars and religious experts. Critics have pointed out several similarities between the language and phrasing used in the King James Bible and the Book of Mormon, which was translated and published by Joseph Smith in the 19th century. Some have accused Smith of taking passages directly from the King James Version and incorporating them into the Book of Mormon without proper attribution or acknowledgement.

However, defenders of Joseph Smith argue that the similarities between the King James Version and the Book of Mormon can be attributed to Smith's familiarity with the language and style of the Bible. They contend that Smith drew inspiration from the King James Version while working on the translation of the Book of Mormon and that the similarities are not indicative of plagiarism. Additionally, they argue that Smith's translation process involved divine inspiration and therefore cannot be equated with traditional plagiarism.

Despite the ongoing debate, the question of whether Joseph Smith plagiarized the King James Version remains a contentious issue. While some view the similarities as evidence of plagiarism, others interpret them as a reflection of Smith's religious and cultural background. The debate continues to spark discussions about the translation process and originality of the Book of Mormon, as well as the role of divine inspiration in its composition.

The first problem is understanding the terminology of Plagiarism as a modern construct and idea that has legal connotations: Second, it is how this term appears to be redefined outside of the legal context. Third, the accusation itself stands without merit because the same argument may be applied to many of the Old and New Testament authors who have engaged in what we may define as plagiarism today. For instance, many of the Pauline epistles quote extensively from the Old Testament without attributing the actual author or passage. The Gospel of Matthew also quotes from various Old Testament passages to reflect the fulfillment of messianic prophecies. To go a step further, some of the Old Testament stories appear to be borrowed from much older cultural stories. Take for instance the story of Adam and Even or Noah and the Flood. Scholars have identified the correlation between the much older Sumerian flood story within the Epic of Gilgamesh (which predates the account narrative of the Flood story in Genesis):

Many scholars recognise that the parallels between the Epic of Gilgamesh and the book of Genesis are so obvious that the authors of the Bible must have used them. The Epic of Gilgamesh is an epic poem from Mesopotamia and is one of the earliest known works of literature. It dates to the 18th century BC. The first parallel is between the story of Enkidu/Shamhat and Adam/Eve. In both stories, a man is created from the soil by a god and lives among the animals. He is introduced to a woman who tempts him – he accepts her offering of food, decides to cover his nakedness, leaves paradise, and is not allowed to return. (Sam Woolfe - How the Bible Borrowed from Other Stories)

Woolfe continues with the following observation: 

Andrew R. George, a translator of the epic argues that the flood story in Genesis 6-8 closely matches the Gilgamesh flood myth in such a way that Genesis must have been derived from it. As Andrew notes, the Genesis flood story follows the Gilgamesh flood story “point by point and in the same order”. In the epic, the god Ea warns Utnapishtim of a great flood and told Utnapishtim to build a boat in order to save all the living things. Just like Noah, he builds the boat, puts all the living things and his family on it, experiences a storm, and after it was all over, he offers a sacrifice to God. Flood stories have been found in many texts which predate the Bible. It’s found in the epic of Ziusudra and the epic of Atrahasis (which is nearly identical to the epic of Gilgamesh). In Hindu mythology, texts like the Satapatha Brahmana mentions a great flood, in which Vishnu advises Manu to build a giant boat.

Atheists actually use the same argument against the Bible in relation to how it appears to have accounts written that were plagiarized from other cultures and religious mythos and motifs. And one of the biggest accusations atheists claim is how the story of Jesus Christ appears to be borrowed from other Ancient Cultures and Civilizations: 

The conspiracy documentary Zeitgeist outlines some striking similarities between the life and death of Jesus and previous gods from other religions, such as Horus, Mithras, Attis, Krishna, Dionysus, as well as many others. The creator of the movie, Peter Joseph, does, however, overstate these similarities in order to support his conspiracy theory that the myths of Jesus and other gods relate to astrological and astronomical events. He claims, for example, that gods like Horus were born on the same day as Jesus (the 25th of December) and that Horus’ mother, Isis, was a virgin. By comparing the Bible to ancient Egyptian texts, we know this is not true – Horus’ birthday was most likely between August 24th and 28th and he was not born of a virgin; his father was Osiris.

However, there are still similarities between Jesus and other gods, suggesting that the authors of the Bible borrowed myths from other religions. For example, the story of the “dying-and-returning-god” is considered a pattern or archetype by many, particularly by Carl Jung and Joseph Campbell. The gods Adonis, Tammuz, Osiris and Dionysus died and were then resurrected. It seems likely that the story of Jesus was following a pattern found in other myths, which in turn were following a common ‘dying-and returning-god’ pattern. This suggests that there never was a real, historical Jesus.

Thus, we see that the same criticism against Joseph Smith is very well the same, if not parallels the same, connotation and argument atheists use against the many Bible Stories. Accusing the writers of Plagiarism. 

So, how come critics of the Latter-day Saint faith, who profess to be Evangelical Christians, continue to rely on same argument? An argument that appears to have received sufficient attention. Good question. 

Counter-Cult Ministry Claims of Plagiarism

Jerald and Sandra Tanner established Utah Lighthouse Ministries in 1983 and published so-called "critical" books on the topic of Mormonism. The Tanners' interest in Mormonism stemmed from their personal history - both Jerald and Sandra came from Mormon families, and their research and publications aimed to educate individuals about the history and beliefs of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Through Utah Lighthouse Ministries, the Tanners sought to provide resources and support for those interested in learning more about Mormonism and for individuals who had questions or concerns about the faith. 

Utah Lighthouse Ministries became well-known as a counter-cult organization dedicated to providing so-called in-depth analysis and critique of Mormonism. The Tanners' work included supposedly exposing inconsistencies in Mormon teachings, history, and practices, which gained them recognition in the field of counter-cult ministries. Their publications and research facilitated discussions and dialogues about the complexities of Mormonism, and many believe it provided valuable insights for individuals navigating their relationship with the faith.

The Tanners' efforts through Utah Lighthouse Ministries have had a lasting impact on the understanding of Mormonism and its portrayal in counter-cult ministries. Their dedication to so-called and questionable scholarly research and the dissemination of information has caused individuals to question and make decisions about their spiritual beliefs and deepened the discussion around Mormonism. Utah Lighthouse Ministries no longer continues to be a valuable resource for individuals seeking a critical examination of Mormonism. It appears that only Evangelical Christians still believe they serve as a platform for open dialogue and understanding within the broader context of counter-cult ministries.

One of their works appears to be the first established criticism and argument for plagiarism. This work appears to have been updated in 2010 and is titled: Joseph Smith's Plagiarism of the Bible in the Book of Mormon. 

LDS leaders claim that Lehi’s group brought to the New World all of the Old Testament books which were written prior to the time they left Jerusalem. Even so, one would not expect an independent translation to use the same words. Besides the many phrases from the Old Testament there are more than twenty-one chapters of Isaiah in the Book of Mormon. 

 The Tanners further claim: 

From letters and comments we have received, it is obvious that many believers in the Book of Mormon do not have a correct understanding of the plagiarism issue. They often point out that some portions of the Bible are similar or even identical to other portions and feel that this demonstrates there is no problem with the Book of Mormon using parts of the Bible. It is true that such similarities do occur. 

The Tanners are not alone in their claim and assertion. From a website MormonThink there is a section under Book of Mormon Problems where the writer references the book The Bible in the Book of Mormon by Curt van den Heuvel (1999):

It is an undeniable fact that the Book of Mormon quotes the Bible. This fact is acknowledged in the Book itself, in such phrases as '…now I, Nephi, write more of the words of Isaiah, for my soul delighteth in his words.' (2 Nephi 11:2). The Book of Mormon contains extensive quotes from Isaiah - some twenty-two chapters of the prophet are found in the Book, in many cases quoted verbatim from the King James Version.

What is less well known is that the Book of Mormon makes a large number of unacknowledged Biblical quotes. These quotes appear as part and parcel of the narrative of the Book, and are quoted by different authors at different times. It is these quotes that are of interest, because they reveal something about the origin of the Book of Mormon.

Thus, we see that such criticism and claim regarding plagiarism against Joseph Smith has had a long-standing tradition and belief within the Evangelical Christian Community since the rise of the counter-cult ministry groups of the late 1970's. 

Paul Gee's Pedestrian Dilemmas

The focus of this post is not so much addressing the criticisms of the Tanners, or other counter-cult ministry groups for that matter: it is to focus on the more recent publication of a book by an Evangelical Christian. This book is titled - Book of Mormon Plagiarism - written and published by Paul Gee. It appears it is only available on Kindle through Amazon. He appears to ask three questions:

• Why are KJV verses found in this book?
• Why are entire KJV Bible chapters copied in this book?
• Why is this book translated in Old English KJV?

And when we come to the introduction of Gee's book - we see the first question being asked: 

Why are so many verses in the Book of Mormon taken from the King James Bible? For example, verses taken from the Book of Isaiah are found all throughout this book. One argument for this, is that Lehi and his family left Jerusalem 100 years after Isaiah had died, so they could have his writings. 

Kindle Edition Only at Amazon.Com

On the surface, this appears to be a valid question based on observation. One that the reader may hopefully find this, and all forthcoming posts, informative as we delve into and answer this question. Suffice it to say - there is actually an answer to this. However, may the reader entertain a different set of questions pertinent to this discussion: 

...because the Book of Mormon was originally written in King James language, we are confronted with the fact that the KJV, regardless of what Bible translation one reads, influences every member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints by virtue of its cadence, language, and terminology appearing in the original English Book of Mormon. In light of this fact, two questions arise concerning the presence of the King James English and text in the Book of Mormon: (1) Why does the Book of Mormon incorporate King James English? and (2) How did such English get into the Book of Mormon text? (Daniel L. Belnap, “The Kind James Bible and the Book of Mormon,” in The King James Bible and the Restoration, ed. Kent P. Jackson (Provo, UT: Religious Studies Center, Brigham Young University, 2011), 162–81.). 

Belnap appears to answer the first question:

Of the two questions, the first is easier to answer, at least from a cultural perspective: the presence of King James English, or early modern English, in the Book of Mormon is most likely the result of the KJV's influence on religious discourse in the early nineteenth century. Such language, though no longer the spoken English, was used in sermons and discourses to impose a sense of tradition to what was being spoken and written. In fact, as late as the early twentieth century, King James language was still used in certain translation mediums. For instance, Charles's translation of the Apocrypha and the Pseudepigrapha, Loeb's series of translations for ancient Latin and Greek texts, and other translations of Classical and Near Eastern texts were written in the King James English to instill an air of antiquity to the nonbiblical texts. That such language would be utilized for the Book of Mormon, a text that purported to be not only ancient but directly related to the Bible, is not a surprise. 

As pertaining to the more difficult question as to how did such English get into the Book of Mormon text? Benlap provides this observation:

• The Book of Mormon contains large blocks of biblical text identical to the King James version.
• However, most changes in the text are superficial and modernize archaic renditions.
• Changes in the text do not affect the underlying biblical concept.
• For example, the Book of Mormon often replaces "which" with "who" and removes plurals from terms.
• These changes do not appear to be based on an original text but on the KJV's translation.
• It may be assumed that Joseph Smith used the pertinent passages of the King James Bible when translating the Book of Mormon.
• However, there are no accounts describing him using a Bible during the translation process.
• Joseph did not elaborate on the translating process when asked, and the details are unclear.
• Recollections of the translating process from others are not consistent and have questionable provenance.
• None of the recollections provide a clear account of the translating process.
• It is agreed that Joseph did not use another record during the translation process.
• Despite this, the influence of the KJV is extensive throughout the Book of Mormon.
• There are more than fifty thousand phrases common to both the Bible and the Book of Mormon.
• There are many differences in recollections of the translating process.
• The truth about the translating process remains unknown.

Benlap also observes, and summarizes, the issue: 

The familiarity of Joseph's contemporaries with King James English would have made their reading of the Book of Mormon an easier experience and one in which they could more readily accept the claims made by the book as both scripture and as an ancient record that was tied to biblical history. The use of King James English in the Book of Mormon would itself be part of the Lord's promise that he would reveal his truth to humankind "after the manner of their language, that they might come to understanding" (D&C 1:24). The specific phrase "manner of language" suggests that such transmission would occur not only in terms of the actual language but even in specific mannerisms that would be recognized by the audience in question. That this "manner of language" worked, at least in part, can be evidenced by how quickly the Book of Mormon became known as the "Golden Bible" or "Mormon Bible" by believers and critics alike, demonstrating a tacit understanding that, at the very least, the Book of Mormon sounded biblical. Thus the presence of King James English and even KJV passages in the Book of Mormon functioned to establish the book's validity to people already familiar with the words of God via King James English while making it easier to recognize the truths found therein because of the text's familiar cadence and sound.

He further enlightens the reader with the following: 

As for the second observation, how Joseph Smith placed King James English and text in the Book of Mormon, we begin by summarizing that in terms of the translation process. Whether Joseph used an actual KJV text is unknown, though all of the witnesses state that he did not. If one assumes that he did not, whether he used loose or tight control of the translating process is unknown because evidence can be provided either way. As vague and ultimately inconclusive as these answers are, they may in fact reveal an important facet of the Book of Mormon and its relationship with its readers. Like other claims the book makes that can neither be confirmed nor denied through solely academic means, one is left to rely on the Lord to know whether or not the book is true. Though Moroni's promise concerning "these things" is specifically about the gospel message found within the Book of Mormon (Moroni 10:4; see v. 5), it also applies to the manner in which the book came forth. In other words, the promise has as much to do with the revelation that Joseph Smith was a true prophet as it does with the revelation that the events described in the Book of Mormon really happened. The lack of any firm answers about the translation process requires that one take Moroni's promise seriously, as only the Holy Ghost can resolve the uncertainty by helping us find peace in Joseph's declaration that the Book of Mormon, and thus its King James English, came about through "the gift and power of God," however it was done.

What the reader ought to take into consideration is this: The burden of proof rests upon the one making the claim and assertion. Meaning, they bear the responsibility to sufficiently provide sound and reasonable evidence supportive of their claim. 

As to Paul Gee's pedestrian dilemma - he appears to make a claim (Facebook Commentary) that his two eBooks published on Amazon Kindle are original and inspired by God: 

Paul Gee Lacks Understanding

Since we understand the cultural reasoning behind the inclusion of King James English within the Book of Mormon. Understand that this criticism of plagiarism is nothing new. There appears to be a lack of understanding on Paul Gee's part. And it is the reason I posted a review on his book:

The third sentence in the introduction to Gee's book reads as follows: 

This would make sense if the writings were on scrolls, but instead they are on plates of brass. The Isaiah scrolls were discovered among the Dead Sea Scrolls. According to the findings, people were writing on scrolls and not brass plates. So to say that the Book of Isaiah was written down on plates makes you wonder if Mormons ever heard of the Dead Sea Scrolls. We have evidence that this book and other old writings were written on ancient scrolls and stored in various types of jars. Therefore, it doesn't make sense to have the Book of Isaiah written on brass plates. And what of the Golden Plates for the Book of Mormon? If Bible authors wrote on plates, then where is the evidence? Have golden plates ever been found with writings from people of old? The answer is no. 

The reader may notice several things. Paul appears to focus solely on the Dead Sea Scrolls. And yes, they were discovered near the Dead Sea by a Boudin who was looking for a lost sheep. Their discovery launched renewed vigor associated with the Ancient Near East and the Old Testament text. And yes, if one were to single out and focus mainly on the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Isaiah scrolls within the collection of the discovery - one will agree. However, archaeologists have actually uncovered a variety of records where they were written on stone and on metal plates. 

For instance, in 1964 three gold leaf metal plates were discovered and dated to about 500 BCE. These plates are known as the Pyrgi Tablets and appear to be written in Etruscan and Phoenician:

In 1964 during an excavation of ancient Pyrgi, the port of the southern Etruscan town of Caere on the Tyrrhenian coast of Italy (now Santa Severa), archaeologist Massimo Pallottino discovered three golden leaves bearing writing in Etruscan and Phoenician. Known as the Pyrgi Tablets, the leaves record a dedication made around 500 BCE by Thefarie Velianas, king of Caere, to the Phoenician goddess ʻAshtaret. Two of the tablets are inscribed in the Etruscan language, the third in Phoenician.

This establishes two things. First, it established that metal plates were used for writing. Second, it establishes the existence of gold tablets or gold like leaflets and plates. Granted, these appear to be dated after Lehi and his family had obtained the plates of brass and left Jerusalem, it does present compelling sound and reasonable evidence as previously mentioned. 

However, there is quite possibly the oldest known book written on golden plates, ring bound, and was discovered over 70 years ago. This book is known as the Golden Etruscan Orphic Book. Quite possibly around 3,000 years old and appears to date to about 660 B.C. 

What is quite interesting is that this discovery of an Ancient Record reflects the ancient cult of Orpheus. One that Pythagoras belonged. Regardless, what we have here are two significant pieces of evidence of not only writing on metal plates in the Ancient Near East - but these are also two significant evidence to show that record keeping on gold metal plates is quite evident of that time period. 

Therefore, Paul Gee's claim that: 

Therefore, it doesn't make sense to have the Book of Isaiah written on brass plates. And what of the Golden Plates for the Book of Mormon? If Bible authors wrote on plates, then where is the evidence? Have golden plates ever been found with writings from people of old? The answer is no. 

Is unfounded, quite lacking, and intellectual dishonest. Either because he appears lazy to do any actual research into the subject matter that he is writing about, or he is quite illiterate regarding metal plates being used for writing. 

There is one interesting observation though - critics of Joseph Smith, the Book of Mormon, and the Restored Gospel shift their accusations and criticisms. Notice what the writer at FAIR LDS (Faithful Answers, Informed Responses) says: 

Today, however, there are numerous examples of ancient writing on metal plates. Ironically, some now claim instead that knowledge of such plates was readily available in Joseph Smith's day. Hugh Nibley's 1952 observation seems quite prescient: "it will not be long before men forget that in Joseph Smith's day the prophet was mocked and derided for his description of the plates more than anything else."

However, let's put the final nail in the coffin of Paul Gee's argument. He mentions the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls. He claims that these scrolls were found in clay jars. All of this is true. What he failed to present is that among the Dead Sea Scrolls, they also discovered what is now known as the Copper Scroll. It is believed that this scroll appears to be a map with Mishnaic Hebrew and Greek Loan words. It supposedly references potential locations of Temple Treasures. 

The second dilemma is that Gee appears to make a claim without any effort put forward to cite any academic or scholarly source related to his claim.  On the contrary (as previously established), metal plates with writings have been discovered throughout various cultures and civilizations. One of the more specific aspects of discovery revolves around copper or copper alloy type metal plates with writing. Noel B. Reynolds explores this in his paper An Everlasting Witness: Ancient Writings on Metal published in 2021. 

Therefore, since there is precedence of seeing that Ancient Cultures and civilizations utilized metal to record histories, stories, and the like - it sufficiently proves that during the time of Lehi dwelling in Jerusalem, the plates of Brass actually did exist and fit within the cultural milieu of what is recorded in the Book of Mormon. 

Conclusion

The problem critics of the prophet Joseph Smith, the Book of Mormon, and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is nothing new or original. Nothing inspiring about those claims and assertions. As the reader may notice - these criticisms disintegrate when investigating them and determining whether they hold any credibility or validity. 

Latter-day Saint Christians are aware of the so-called plagiarisms. However, the burden of proof rests upon critics like Paul Gee to present sound and cohesive reasonable objections for proper consideration. Merely making claims and assertions (as seen) is mere opinion. Whether it is conflated ego-opine driven content or mere lacking any form of intellectual integrity. It presents a compelling understanding of our critic's attitude and behavior. 

As for the remainder of Paul Gee's introduction, yes - Latter-day Saints are aware of the amount of so-called plagiarism found within the Book of Mormon. Yes, we are aware of how this may appear to individuals. Hence, it behooves the reader to investigate such claims from a variety of sources and determine which presents the more reasonable and sounder understanding. 

Understanding the Book of Mormon: A Comprehensive Overview of Another Testament of Jesus Christ

 Photo by Priscilla Du Preez 🇨🇦 on Unsplash | Commercial use allowed

Come Follow Me | January 1-7: Another Testament of Jesus Christ - Introductory Pages of the Book of Mormon

A prophetic promise. President Russell M. Nelson said, “I promise that as you ponder what you study [in the Book of Mormon], the windows of heaven will open, and you will receive answers to your own questions and direction for your own life” (“The Book of Mormon: What Would Your Life Be Like without It?” Ensign
 or Liahona, Nov. 2017, 62–63).

Introduction: Understanding the Book of Mormon

The Book of Mormon is a sacred text that serves as another testament of Jesus Christ, alongside the Bible. It is a record of ancient inhabitants of the Americas and contains profound teachings, prophecies, and testimonies of Jesus Christ. In this article, we will explore the content and significance of the Book of Mormon, shedding light on its introductory pages and key scriptures that testify of the Savior. We will also delve into the translation process, the purpose of the book, and the importance of prayer, meditation, and applying spiritual principles while studying it. Additionally, we will discuss the testimonies of the Three Witnesses and the Eight Witnesses, as well as the divine timing of the Book of Mormon's coming forth. Through this comprehensive overview, we hope to deepen your understanding and appreciation for this sacred scripture.

The Book of Mormon is a unique and powerful testament of Jesus Christ. It is not meant to replace the Bible, but rather to complement it and provide additional insights into the life and teachings of our Savior. The Book of Mormon was written by ancient prophets who lived in the Americas, and it covers a time period of about 600 years, from approximately 600 B.C. to 400 A.D. The book contains the religious, political, and cultural history of these ancient peoples and their interactions with God. It is divided into several books, each named after the prophet who recorded the events.

The Book of Mormon is a valuable resource for individuals seeking to deepen their understanding of Jesus Christ and His gospel. It provides additional witnesses and testimonies of His divinity, His Atonement, and His teachings. By studying the Book of Mormon, individuals can gain new insights and perspectives on the life and ministry of Jesus Christ. The Book of Mormon serves as a powerful tool to strengthen faith, increase knowledge, and inspire personal growth in disciples of Jesus Christ.

BECOME A PATREON MEMBER TO READ FULL ARTICLE