Insights and Applications from Neal A. Maxwell's 'The Promise of Discipleship': Living Faithfully Today

Available for purchase through this Amazon Affiliate Link

Neal A. Maxwell’s writings on discipleship offer steady guidance in a world where faith often feels tested. In the opening chapter of The Promise of Discipleship, he presents timeless lessons on living with integrity, staying anchored in Christ, and building spiritual resilience. His insights challenge us to prioritize Christian character over worldly distractions and align our lives with Gospel principles. Drawing from scripture, this chapter encourages us to trust the Lord’s promises, even when the path is difficult. Dive into these teachings, and let them inspire your journey of faith. Please share your thoughts below and join the discussion.

Key Themes in 'All Things Shall Be in Commotion'

Neal A. Maxwell’s poignant insights from The Promise of Discipleship challenge us to navigate our faith amid unsettling times. The phrase “all things shall be in commotion,” referenced in scripture, is brought to life in this chapter as a mirror of our modern-day trials. Let’s explore the key themes it presents and their profound implications for our discipleship journey.

The Prophecy of Commotion: How It Relates to Societal Challenges Today

The phrase “all things shall be in commotion,” found in Doctrine and Covenants 88:91 and 45:26, paints a vivid picture of the world’s unrest. While it was a prophecy of the last days, it feels strikingly relevant today. We live in a time marked by moral confusion, declining spiritual values, and unprecedented polarization. Headlines often reflect social upheaval, climate anxieties, and global conflicts, reminding us how deeply intertwined this scriptural phrase is with our current reality.

For disciples of Christ, this commotion is not just an external observation—it’s a spiritual challenge. How do we stand firm when the world around us feels so unstable? Neal A. Maxwell emphasizes that discipleship requires a resilience that anchors us in faith amid chaos. Trusting in God’s plan becomes both our refuge and our responsibility. His message assures us that while challenges may grow, so too does the Lord’s light.

External Chaos and Internal Struggles: Finding Balance as Disciples

Commotion doesn’t just happen on news screens or in the streets; it also manifests within us. Life’s pressures—the pursuit of success, family challenges, or facing personal failures—often create their own storms inside our hearts. Elder Maxwell noted that these trials can leave us feeling spiritually disoriented if we’re not grounded in our discipleship efforts.

Think about it: how often does the noise of the world leak into your soul? Just as external chaos demands answers, internal struggles require spiritual solutions. Maxwell’s words teach us that lasting peace comes from prioritizing spiritual integrity over momentary relief.

Here’s the dual challenge:

• Externally, we face a whirlwind of cultural shifts and societal debates that sometimes make standing for Gospel principles feel isolating.
• Internally, we wrestle with doubts, distractions, and the spiritual fatigue that can make discipleship feel daunting.

But Christ offers us hope. In scripture, we find comfort in the Savior’s reminder: “Be not troubled” (Matthew 24:6). This doesn’t imply dismissing reality but rather aligning our inner compass with God’s eternal purposes. By turning to Christ in prayer, scripture study, and devotional living, our internal struggles are tempered, even as the external storms rage.

---

What are your thoughts about navigating today’s societal commotion while strengthening your personal faith? Share your experiences in the comments below. And if this post resonates with you, consider sharing it with others seeking hope and faith-filled guidance. Let’s grow together in Christ’s light!

Scriptural Foundations of Discipleship

Understanding discipleship requires us to return to the Scriptures. Neal A. Maxwell’s insights shine a light on how timeless biblical themes are not only relevant but indispensable to fostering spiritual integrity in today’s turbulent times. Let’s break down three key scriptural teachings that deepen our understanding of discipleship.

Matthew 24:12: The Decline of Love

“And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold” (Matthew 24:12). This verse poignantly describes a society where lawlessness leads to a dwindling of love. But how does this relate to personal discipleship?

When societal love grows cold, it reflects a self-focus that pushes godly principles aside. Without love for others, discipleship becomes hollow, reducing service and compassion to mere obligations. Have you ever noticed how easy it is to withdraw when the world feels increasingly unkind or indifferent?

As disciples, it’s our calling to resist this decline. Think of love as a muscle—when we nurture it through service, prayer, and kindness, it grows. But when neglected, it atrophies. Christ’s ministry teaches us that love is both the foundation and expression of discipleship. Living in a world where love is often conditional, we are reminded to commit to the selfless, enduring kind of love that Christ modeled.

2 Timothy 3:1-5: Superficial Spirituality

Paul warns in 2 Timothy 3:1-5 of a time when people would embrace “a form of godliness but deny its power.” This superficial spirituality presents a pressing problem for modern disciples: it’s easy to look godly outwardly while harboring a disconnected, self-centered heart.

Consider the checklist mentality that can creep into our faith. Do you ever find yourself going through the motions—praying, attending church—but feeling spiritually dry? That’s the danger Paul warns about. Discipleship isn’t about appearances or hollow routines; it’s a transformative relationship with Christ that bears real fruit.

Modern distractions can further dilute our faith. Social media provides a mirror where image often trumps authenticity, and our walk with God risks becoming just another performance. But true discipleship calls us to something deeper. Paul’s words encourage us to reject superficiality and pursue genuine godliness, even when it requires self-examination and change.

John 16:33: Overcoming Tribulation

Christ’s promise in John 16:33 is both sobering and reassuring: “In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world.” This verse acknowledges the inevitability of trials while reminding us of Christ’s ultimate victory.

Life’s struggles often test the resolve of discipleship. Pain, failure, and uncertainty can make us question our faith. Yet, the essence of discipleship is a steady trust in Christ’s triumph. His promise serves as a lifeline, offering peace in the middle of chaos. Have you ever experienced a moment when, despite external storms, your heart found calm because of His words?

Tribulation forces us to choose—cling to our faith or let fear guide us. Christ’s victory shows us that no battle is too great when we rely on His strength. Discipleship is, at its heart, about walking in His peace, knowing that even in hardship, we are never alone.

---

What scriptures resonate most with your journey of discipleship? Share your thoughts below, and let’s explore together how God’s promises shape our faith today. If this has touched your heart, I encourage you to like, share, or even donate to support these discussions of faith and resilience.

Practical Applications for Discipleship Today

Discipleship isn’t just about knowledge; it’s about putting faith into action daily. In The Promise of Discipleship, Neal A. Maxwell highlights that the path of discipleship requires intentionality and consistency. To make this timeless principle relevant today, we need actionable steps. This section focuses on ways to live and grow as disciples in a complex world.

Creating a Personal Discipleship Plan

A personal discipleship plan is like a map—it gives direction and clarity to your spiritual journey. Without it, staying consistent in our faith practices is tough, especially when life feels overwhelming.

Start with three core practices:

1. Scripture study. Dedicate a specific time daily to reading God’s word. This could be as simple as a chapter a day.
2. Prayer. Treat prayer as a dialogue, not a routine. Use this time to seek guidance and express gratitude.
3. Service. Find small ways to serve others. Whether it's helping a neighbor or volunteering at church, service strengthens both faith and community.

When creating your plan, think of it as something flexible yet firm—like a tree rooted deeply but able to sway with the wind. Missing a day doesn’t mean failure; it means an opportunity to refocus. Ask yourself: What changes can I make to align my daily routine with Christ’s teachings?

Building Spiritual Resilience

The world will test your faith—it’s inevitable. Neal A. Maxwell often pointed out that discipleship isn’t free of challenges, but those challenges refine us. Building spiritual resilience means preparing yourself to withstand these tests and growing stronger because of them.

How do we strengthen our spiritual "muscles"?

• Stay consistent with your spiritual habits. Just as an athlete trains daily, a disciple should regularly engage in worship and study.
• Surround yourself with like-minded believers. A strong community can act as a safety net during moments of doubt or hardship.
• Revisit God’s promises. Scriptures like John 16:33 remind us that Christ has already overcome the world. Meditating on these promises renews hope.

Think of resilience as a shield, crafted through faith and perseverance. When external pressures seem too heavy, let those moments draw you closer to the Savior.

Living with Integrity

Integrity is the anchor of discipleship. Living with integrity means aligning your actions with Gospel principles, even when it’s inconvenient or unpopular. Neal A. Maxwell emphasized that discipleship demands consistency—both in public and private.

Living with integrity isn’t theoretical; it shows up in small, everyday choices:

• Make honest decisions. Even when no one is watching, choose what’s right.
• Set boundaries. Say no to anything that conflicts with your values, even if it’s socially acceptable.
• Reflect often. Ask yourself, “Do my actions align with what I profess to believe?”

Integrity builds trust—with others, with yourself, and most importantly, with God. Imagine it as a compass that keeps you oriented toward true north, no matter how confusing the direction might seem. By living with integrity, we invite the light of Christ to shine through us, influencing the lives of those we interact with.

---

What steps do you take to strengthen your discipleship? Feel free to share them in the comments below. Let’s inspire and learn from one another as we strive to grow closer to Christ.

Reflective Questions for Deepening Faith

In The Promise of Discipleship, Neal A. Maxwell emphasizes the importance of reflection in nurturing our faith. Engaging with reflective questions can lead to profound insights, allowing us to grow in our understanding of discipleship and strengthen our commitment to God. Let's explore some critical aspects of this transformative process through focused inquiries.

Personal Definition of Discipleship

What does discipleship mean to you today? This question encourages us to articulate our personal understanding of what it means to follow Christ in the modern world. Discipleship isn’t a one-size-fits-all concept; it’s a unique journey defined by our experiences and convictions. Here are a few prompts to consider:

• What actions or beliefs distinctly characterize your discipleship?
• How does your understanding of discipleship evolve as you navigate life’s challenges?
• In what ways do you feel called to serve others?

Reflecting on these questions can help each of us identify our core values and guiding principles as disciples. Think of your definition as a living document—one that grows and adapts as your faith deepens.

Finding Peace in Commotion

In a chaotic world, discovering inner peace is essential for discipleship. During difficult times, we might wonder where to find solace. To guide your reflection, consider these questions:

• What specific practices bring you peace amid life’s storms?
• How can you intentionally carve out time for stillness and prayer?
• When was the last time you felt God’s presence during turmoil? What helped you recognize it?

These inquiries prompt us to focus on our emotional and spiritual well-being. Finding peace often requires intentional actions, such as prayer, scripture study, or quiet meditation. By identifying our sources of calm, we build resilience in our discipleship journey.

Commitment to Christ's Teachings

Deepening our commitment to living out Gospel principles strengthens our faith and shapes our actions. To explore this area further, reflect on these questions:

• How are you actively applying Christ’s teachings in your daily life?
• Are there areas where you feel challenged to align your actions with your beliefs? What steps can you take?
• What role do prayer and scripture play in reinforcing your commitment?

These questions encourage each of us to evaluate our spiritual practices and consider adjustments that might enhance our faith. Living out Christ's teachings is not just about personal growth; it's about becoming a beacon of hope for others.

---

How do you relate to these reflective questions? What insights do you have about deepening your faith? Share your thoughts in the comments below. Let’s engage in this meaningful conversation and support one another on our discipleship journeys. If you’ve found value here, please like, share, or consider subscribing for more insights. Your contributions can help foster a community of faith and growth.

Encouragement to Engage with the Community

Engaging with the community plays a crucial role in our discipleship journey. When we interact with fellow believers, we not only strengthen our understanding of the Gospel but also create an environment where faith can thrive. As we explore the profound insights from The Promise of Discipleship, let’s consider how we can intentionally connect with others on this path.

The Power of Community Connections

The essence of discipleship isn’t solely about personal faith; it’s also about sharing that faith with others. Community provides a space where we can grow together, sharing experiences and challenges. Here are some key reasons to get involved:

• Mutual Support: We all face struggles. In a community, we can support each other through prayer and encouragement. A shoulder to lean on can make all the difference.
• Collective Learning: Participating in discussions and group studies allows us to learn from different perspectives. Sharing insights can deepen our understanding of scripture and its application in our lives.
• Shared Mission: When we work together to serve others, we reflect Christ’s love in action. Collaboration can spark initiatives that bless many, fostering a greater sense of purpose.

Think of community like a garden. Each person brings unique strengths, much like different plants. When nurtured together, they create a vibrant and fruitful space.

Embracing Vulnerability in Relationships

Building genuine relationships requires vulnerability. It’s essential to open up about our struggles and victories alike. Here are some practical ways to foster a sense of openness:

1. Be Honest: Share your challenges and faith journey. Your honesty may encourage someone else to do the same.
2. Listen Actively: Show genuine interest in others’ stories. Listening can deepen connections and help create a safe environment for sharing.
3. Participate in Group Activities: Attend church events, volunteer opportunities, or study groups. Being present helps knit relationships closer.

When we share our struggles and joys, we create a bond that makes discipleship more meaningful. It’s comforting to know that we’re not walking this path alone.

Encouraging Accountability

In a close-knit community, accountability becomes natural. We can gently remind each other of our commitments to faith and personal growth. Here’s how accountability can manifest:

• Regular Check-Ins: Set a time to meet and discuss personal goals in faith. Ask how you can support each other in pursuing these.
• Prayer Partners: Pair up with someone to pray for each other’s needs and spiritual growth. This creates an ongoing support system.
• Study Groups: Join or create groups that focus on scripture study and discussion. It’s easier to stay committed when you know others are counting on you.

Accountability acts like a lighthouse, guiding us through spiritual fog. It helps keep our focus on the Savior and encourages us to stay true to our commitments.

---

How does engaging with your community shape your discipleship? Share your thoughts and experiences in the comments below. If this resonates with you, consider sharing this post with others seeking to enhance their faith through community. Let’s grow together in Christ’s love!

Conclusion

Neal A. Maxwell’s opening chapter in The Promise of Discipleship offers us deep insights essential for strengthening our faith in today's chaotic world. His message emphasizes the importance of integrity, spiritual resilience, and the unwavering trust in God’s promises, particularly when external stresses threaten to shake our foundations.

As we strive to embody Christ-like character, let us also remember that discipleship is an active commitment. I encourage you to reflect on your own faith journey and how you can apply these principles daily.

What steps will you take this week to deepen your discipleship? Please share your thoughts in the comments below. If this resonates with you or could help someone else, don’t hesitate to like, share, or subscribe for more insights. Your engagement makes a difference. Thank you for being part of this exploration of faith.

The Spiritual Symbolism of the Garment of the Holy Priesthood

 

The article in the September issue of the Liahona titled the "Garment of the Holy Priesthood," serves as a sacred reminder of covenants made with God. It begins by reflecting on the experience of Adam and Eve as they left the Garden of Eden, transitioning from a state of paradise to a world filled with challenges, pain, and separation from their Heavenly Father. This separation is highlighted as a profound source of sorrow, as they became aware of their nakedness and vulnerability after partaking of the forbidden fruit.

In response to their need for comfort and remembrance of their covenants, God provided Adam and Eve with "coats of skins." This act symbolizes God's mercy and serves as a reminder of their sacred promises. The coats of skins are seen as a precursor to the "garment of salvation," which represents the Atonement of Jesus Christ. The article emphasizes that just as Adam and Eve were clothed to remember their covenants, modern-day individuals are also given a physical reminder of their commitments through the garment of the holy priesthood.

The garment is described as a symbol of the Savior, Jesus Christ, and is worn beneath outer clothing, signifying that covenants are a constant presence in the lives of the faithful. President Jeffrey R. Holland stresses the importance of keeping these covenants close and personal, as they are sacred and should not be modified to fit societal norms. The garment is worn daily, reflecting a disciple's desire for the Savior's influence in their life, contrasting with other symbols of faith that are observed less frequently, such as baptism and sacrament.

The article also addresses the challenges of living in a fallen world, where individuals may feel distanced from God due to transgressions. It emphasizes the importance of remembering covenants and the power, protection, and mercy that the garment represents. The author encourages individuals to seek ways to remember Jesus Christ, while also acknowledging the specific reminder provided through the garment.

The article concludes with a call for individuals to seek divine guidance regarding their personal questions about wearing the garment, suggesting that answers can be found through church resources, trusted leaders, and personal communication with God. It reassures readers that God understands their circumstances and desires their success in keeping covenants. The author, as an Apostle of the Lord Jesus Christ, emphasizes the importance of adhering to the standards of devotion and modesty associated with the garment, while also encouraging individuals to consult with medical professionals when necessary.

Overall, the article highlights the garment of the holy priesthood as a vital symbol of faith, a reminder of sacred covenants, and a source of strength and guidance in navigating the challenges of life.

READ FULL ARTICLE HERE

Embracing Forgiveness: Lessons from 1 Nephi 7:6-21

 

Forgiveness, especially in the context of abuse, is undoubtedly challenging. Many of us grappling with trauma carry burdens of shame, guilt, and a profound sense of powerlessness inflicted by those who’ve harmed us—be it emotionally, spiritually, or physically. It’s even more complex when the individuals in question are family members, which adds layers of complexity to our emotional ties and experiences.

The idea that forgiveness is necessary might be universally understood yet putting it into practice is another story. It involves a humbling journey of self-reflection, recognizing our emotional responses, and grappling with feelings of bitterness and resentment that bind us. Holding onto these emotions often feels like being locked in an emotional prison, where statements like “They don’t deserve my forgiveness!” become the bars that confine us.

Throughout my own journey, I have leaned on both spiritual insights and personal reflections. For instance, the scriptural account in 1 Nephi 7:6-21 has been instrumental in guiding my understanding of forgiveness. It illustrates how Nephi manages to forgive his brothers despite their mistreatment. This passage underscores the profound spiritual and personal growth that can emerge from the act of forgiving.

BECOME A PATREON SPONSOR TO READ FULL ARTICLE

Romans 9:10-11 in Context: Reconciling with Latter-day Saint Christian Teachings on Pre-existence

Photo by Timothy Eberly on Unsplash | Commercial Use Allowed

In this comprehensive exploration, we will unravel the intricate tapestry of the Latter-day Saint doctrine of Pre-existence and its correlation with Romans 9:10-11. By examining the scriptural framework and historical context, we aim to unveil the profound harmony between these profound teachings, offering a greater appreciation for both the unity and diversity of God's eternal plan.

The recent discussion on how Latter-day Saint Christians reconcile the doctrine of Pre-existence with Romans 9:10-11 has sparked a lot of interest. This conversation took place in the LDS & Bible-believing Christian Discussion Group on Facebook. The individual who initially asked the question did not provide a doctrinal framework for their interpretation or perspective. It's assumed that this individual, who appears to be an admin for the group, may adhere to the doctrine of Predestination, which is held by proponents of Reformed theology, specifically Calvinism. The discussion and evidence presented aim to address how the doctrine of Pre-existence aligns with Romans 9:10-11.

The post includes actual screenshots from the group discussion alongside commentary. It's up to the reader to determine the validity and credibility of whether the original question was answered with sound and reasonable evidence.

Jon Clark:

"My understanding is that Mormon doctrine teaches that souls are eternal and live in a pre-existence prior to birth. 

For people who believe this doctrine, how do you explain Romans 9:10-11? 

"And not only that, but there was also Rebekah, when she had conceived twins by one man, our father Isaac; for though the twins were not yet born and had not done anything good or bad, so that God's purpose according to His choice would stand, not because of works but because of Him who calls."  

My Response:

Simple, Paul is writing to Roman Christians who are Jews. He is reminding them of the covenants God had made with Abraham and then with Jacob, and then with Moses. God's choosing of making a Covenant with Jacob and not Esau had nothing to do with their volition. God already had purpose in establishing Israel as YHWH's inheritance (cf Deuteronomy 32:8-9). This covenant was to establish the chosen lineage through which the messiah will be birthed from. And this was already established in the Pre-existence and God's plan of redemption. Paul was well aware of the doctrine of the Pre-existence as a learned Pharisee and Jew. This is also encapsulated in the Babylonian Talmud and the Bereshit as to six things having either been created or come into existence prior to the creation of the world and humanity. 

Jon Clark

Timothy Berman, 

-- "Paul is writing to Roman Christians who are Jews."

Rome is and was a mix of cultures. Both Jews and Gentiles lived (and live) in Rome. 

-- "He is reminding them of the covenants God had made with Abraham and then with Jacob, and then with Moses"

Where is God reminding anyone of the covenants in the passage I cited? There's literally no mention of any covenants anywhere.

-- "Paul was well aware of the doctrine of the pre-existence as a learned pharisee and jew." 

An argument from silence. 

-- "This is also encapsulated in the Babylonian Talmud and the Bereshit as to six things having either been created or come into existence prior to the creation of the world and humanity."

So? The Babylonian Talmud does what exactly to prove spiritual truth?

Unmasking Gaslighting: Navigating Healthy Conversations in Apologetics

This article explores the topic of gaslighting in apologetics, discussing its definition, impact on mental well-being, common tactics, and strategies for addressing and protecting oneself from gaslighting behavior in faith-based discussions.

Photo by Brooke Cagle on Unsplash | Commercial use allowed

Introduction

Gaslighting in apologetics can take various forms, including the use of nonsensical logical fallacies, the manipulation of language, and the distortion of facts to coerce individuals into accepting certain religious beliefs or to make them doubt their own understanding of their faith. Therefore, understanding the insidious nature of gaslighting in apologetics is crucial for fostering healthy and respectful conversations within religious communities, promoting understanding, empathy, and the pursuit of genuine truth.

Gaslighting within apologetics can manifest in various ways, such as through the use of nonsensical logical fallacies and psychobabble to justify certain faith-based positions. This manipulation can lead individuals to question their own sanity and doubt the validity of their experiences, ultimately undermining their confidence in their beliefs and values. For instance, when a person raises a legitimate concern about a religious belief, the gaslighter may shift the focus of the discussion onto the individual's supposed shortcomings, deflecting from the original issue and inducing self-doubt in the individual's mind.

Furthermore, gaslighting tactics in apologetics can have a detrimental impact on an individual's mental and emotional well-being. By distorting the truth and coercing individuals into questioning their own experiences, gaslighting can lead to feelings of anxiety, depression, and self-doubt. The use of manipulative strategies , such as denial, shaming, and blaming, can create an environment of psychological distress and emotional turmoil for those involved in apologetics discussions, ultimately hindering healthy and respectful dialogue within faith-based communities. This highlights the urgent need to recognize and address gaslighting behavior in apologetics to foster a supportive and constructive environment for engaging in discussions related to faith and beliefs.

One specific example of gaslighting in apologetics is when individuals raise genuine questions or concerns about certain religious beliefs and are met with dismissive responses that aim to invalidate their experiences and perceptions. This can lead to self-doubt and confusion, ultimately undermining the individual's confidence in their faith and contributing to emotional distress.

Understanding Gaslighting in Apologetics

Gaslighting in the context of apologetics involves manipulating someone into questioning their own beliefs, perceptions, and experiences, leading them to doubt their sanity and judgment. In the realm of faith and religious discussions, the application of gaslighting tactics distorts the intended purpose of apologetics, which is to provide a rational and logical defense for one's faith or position. Instead of fostering an environment of open dialogue and mutual respect, gaslighting in apologetics undermines the fundamental principles of healthy discourse and respectful engagement within faith-based communities.

Gaslighting tactics in apologetics discussions may involve the use of nonsensical logical fallacies, psychobabble, and manipulative language to coerce individuals into questioning their own beliefs and experiences. This can create an atmosphere of uncertainty and doubt, leading to emotional distress and undermining the pursuit of genuine understanding and truth within religious conversations. Therefore, recognizing and understanding the detrimental impact of gaslighting in apologetics is essential for fostering an environment of healthy and constructive dialogue within faith-based communities.

An example of gaslighting in apologetics is when individuals express genuine concerns or doubts about certain religious teachings and are met with dismissive or shaming responses that aim to invalidate their experiences. This manipulation can lead individuals to question their own beliefs and perceptions, ultimately compromising their emotional well-being and the integrity of the apologetics discourse.

The Toxic Effects of Gaslighting in Apologetics

Gaslighting in apologetics can have severe negative impacts on an individual's mental and emotional well-being, leading to feelings of anxiety, depression, and self-doubt. When individuals engage in discussions or debates related to faith and beliefs, the manipulative tactics employed in gaslighting can erode their confidence and sense of reality. This can create a significant emotional toll, causing distress and confusion as individuals grapple with the covert attempts to undermine their beliefs and experiences.

In addition, within religious communities, the use of gaslighting can be particularly damaging. When individuals seek spiritual guidance and support, they are often in a vulnerable position, looking for validation and reassurance. However, when gaslighting is employed in these settings, it can lead to self-harm and suicidal ideation among vulnerable individuals. The constant state of insecurity, doubt, and fear induced by gaslighting can create an environment ripe for exploitation, ultimately jeopardizing the mental and emotional well-being of those involved in the discussions. The impact of gaslighting in apologetics, especially within religious communities, underscores the critical need to address and prevent such behavior to protect the overall well-being of individuals engaging in faith-based discussions.

The toxic effects of gaslighting in apologetics extend beyond individual experiences and can permeate entire faith-based communities. The use of manipulative tactics to coerce individuals into accepting certain religious viewpoints or to doubt their own experiences and beliefs can lead to a breakdown of trust and the erosion of healthy discourse within these communities. This can contribute to strained relationships, emotional distress, and a lack of genuine understanding and support, ultimately compromising the integrity and well-being of faith-based environments.

Recognizing Gaslighting Behavior

Recognizing gaslighting behavior in apologetics is crucial for maintaining healthy and respectful discussions within faith-based communities. One common warning sign of gaslighting is denial, where individuals may dismiss valid concerns or questions raised by others, causing the victim to doubt their own perceptions and experiences. For instance, if someone expresses doubts about certain religious teachings and is met with responses like, "You're imagining things" or "That never happened," it can be a sign of gaslighting, leading the individual to question their own beliefs and understanding.

Another red flag is blame-shifting, where the focus of the conversation is redirected to the perceived faults of the individual raising questions. This tactic can make the victim feel guilty or ashamed of expressing their genuine thoughts and concerns. In apologetics, this can be observed when individuals are made to feel responsible for their doubts or beliefs, being told that their skepticism is a result of their lack of faith or commitment. By shifting the blame onto the victim, the gaslighter aims to exert control and manipulate the individual's beliefs and emotions.

Furthermore, shaming is a prevalent gaslighting tactic in apologetics discussions, where individuals are made to feel inadequate or inferior for expressing their genuine thoughts or experiences. This can take the form of labeling someone as "weak in faith" or "spiritually immature" for questioning certain religious doctrines or beliefs. By using shame as a tool, gaslighters aim to undermine the victim's confidence and self-worth, making it easier to control and influence their beliefs and behaviors within the faith community.

It's important for individuals to be aware of these signs of gaslighting in apologetics discussions to protect their mental and emotional well-being. Recognizing these behaviors can empower individuals to set boundaries, seek support, and disengage from toxic interactions, fostering an environment of mutual respect and understanding within faith-based communities.

A specific example of recognizing gaslighting behavior in apologetics is when individuals express genuine concerns or questions about certain religious beliefs and are met with dismissive or shaming responses that aim to invalidate their experiences. This manipulation can lead individuals to question their own beliefs and perceptions, ultimately compromising their emotional well-being and the integrity of the apologetics discourse.

Common Gaslighting Tactics in Apologetics

Gaslighting in apologetics conversations often involves more subtle tactics that aim to sow seeds of doubt and confusion in the minds of those engaging in the discussion. One common tactic is the use of nonsensical logical fallacies to defend certain beliefs, which can leave the other party feeling confused and uncertain about their own position. For example, when a person questions a specific belief, they might be met with circular reasoning or ad hominem attacks, making them doubt the validity of their concerns and inquiries.

Another common gaslighting tactic in apologetics is the use of psychobabble to justify particular positions about faith. This can manifest in the form of attributing doubt or questioning to a lack of faith rather than addressing the legitimate concerns raised by the individual. By dismissing genuine inquiries as a lack of spirituality or faith, the person engaging in the discussion is made to feel inadequate in their beliefs and may begin to question their own reasoning and intuition.

Furthermore, gaslighting in apologetics often involves the manipulation of language to create an illusion of certainty and correctness. This can be seen through the use of garbage rationalizations, where convoluted explanations and excuses are presented as undeniable truths. For instance, individuals may be presented with convoluted explanations that are difficult to follow, leaving them feeling intellectually inferior and more likely to doubt their own understanding of the situation.

These tactics are detrimental as they create an environment where individuals are coerced into doubting their own perceptions and beliefs, ultimately leading to a loss of confidence and emotional distress. It is essential to recognize these tactics and the harm they can cause in apologetics discussions to protect one's mental and emotional well-being.

Gaslighting tactics in apologetics can also involve the use of the "The Emperor Has No Clothes" Fallacy to undermine the beliefs and experiences of individuals expressing genuine concerns or doubts about certain religious teachings. This manipulation aims to invalidate the individual's experiences and perceptions, leaving them feeling confused and uncertain about their own beliefs.

Consequences of Gaslighting in Apologetics

For instance, in a religious setting, a person expressing doubt about a particular doctrine may be met with dismissive or shaming responses, intended to invalidate their concerns. Over time, this erodes the individual's confidence and may lead to a fear of expressing their honest questions and seeking genuine understanding. As a result, the individual's emotional well-being is compromised, and the community as a whole may suffer from the lack of open and respectful dialogue, which is essential for healthy spiritual growth.

Furthermore, real-life examples of gaslighting within religious and apologetics contexts have revealed the detrimental effects of this behavior. From individuals experiencing heightened anxiety and depression to the breakdown of meaningful connections within their faith communities, the impact of gaslighting cannot be overlooked. These examples serve as cautionary tales, highlighting the urgent need to address and prevent gaslighting behavior within apologetics to safeguard the well-being of individuals engaging in discussions about faith and beliefs.

An example of the consequences of gaslighting in apologetics is the breakdown of trust and genuine understanding within faith-based communities, leading to strained relationships and emotional distress. By coercing individuals into doubting their beliefs and experiences, gaslighting undermines the integrity of apologetics discourse and compromises the emotional well-being of those involved in these discussions.

Protecting Against Gaslighting in Apologetics

One strategy for protecting oneself from gaslighting in apologetics is to develop a strong awareness of common gaslighting tactics. By familiarizing oneself with these tactics, individuals can identify when they are being manipulated and respond to such behavior effectively. For example, if an apologist uses the "The Emperor Has No Clothes" Fallacy to dismiss legitimate questions or concerns, recognizing this tactic can empower individuals to challenge the gaslighting attempt and maintain their confidence in their beliefs.

Moreover, setting clear boundaries in apologetics discussions can serve as a protective measure against gaslighting. Establishing and communicating personal boundaries can help to deter manipulative behavior and ensure that individuals engage in respectful and constructive conversations. For instance, clearly expressing that certain gaslighting tactics, such as shaming or blaming, are not acceptable in discussions can prevent the gaslighter from further perpetuating such behavior. This proactive approach can contribute to a healthier and more conducive environment for exploring and defending one's faith or beliefs.

Seeking support from trustworthy and understanding sources is another crucial aspect of protecting against gaslighting in apologetics. Having a network of individuals who can provide validation, guidance, and perspective can help counteract the isolating and undermining effects of gaslighting. Whether it is through engaging in discussions with mentors, peers, or mental health professionals, seeking support can offer valuable insights and reassurance, helping individuals maintain their emotional and mental well-being in the face of gaslighting attempts. By implementing these protective strategies, individuals can navigate apologetics discussions with greater confidence and resilience, safeguarding themselves from the detrimental consequences of gaslighting tactics.

Addressing Gaslighting Behavior in Apologetics

When confronting gaslighting behavior in apologetics discussions, it's essential to employ assertive communication techniques. This involves clearly and confidently expressing one's thoughts, feelings, and concerns while maintaining a respectful tone. For example, if an individual feels that their beliefs are being manipulated or undermined, they can assertively communicate their boundaries and expectations within the conversation. By doing so, they can address gaslighting tactics and prevent the situation from escalating further.

In addition to assertive communication, seeking mediation may be necessary in more challenging situations. In cases where gaslighting behavior persists despite attempts to address it directly, involving a neutral third party, such as a mediator or counselor, can provide a supportive and constructive environment for resolving conflicts. Mediation can offer a platform for both parties to express their perspectives and work towards a mutually respectful resolution, helping to mitigate the harmful effects of gaslighting in apologetics discussions.

Furthermore, individuals should seek support and validation outside of gaslighting environments. This can involve confiding in trusted friends, mentors, or members of supportive communities who can offer perspective, empathy, and encouragement. By seeking validation and support from reliable sources, individuals can gain clarity and strength to navigate challenging apologetics discussions, safeguarding their mental and emotional well-being in the process. It's crucial to emphasize the importance of prioritizing healthy and respectful interactions within faith-based communities, promoting an environment of mutual respect, understanding, and constructive dialogue.

An example of addressing gaslighting behavior in apologetics is when individuals employ assertive communication techniques to express their concerns and expectations within the discourse. By setting clear boundaries and seeking mediation if necessary, individuals can address and prevent the harmful effects of gaslighting, ultimately fostering an environment of healthy and respectful dialogue within faith-based communities.

Disengaging from Gaslighting Conversations in Apologetics

Furthermore, disengaging from gaslighting conversations involves knowing when to walk away from toxic interactions. This may include taking a break from online forums, social media debates, or even in-person discussions that exhibit signs of gaslighting behavior. By recognizing the warning signs and being willing to disengage, individuals can protect themselves from the detrimental effects of gaslighting, allowing for a healthier and more balanced engagement in apologetics.

An example of disengaging from gaslighting conversations in apologetics is when individuals recognize the harmful effects of manipulative behavior and choose to set clear boundaries and disengage from toxic interactions. By prioritizing healthy and respectful conversations, individuals can protect their mental and emotional well-being, ultimately fostering an environment of constructive dialogue within faith-based communities.

Conclusion and Call to Action

Gaslighting in apologetics can have detrimental effects on individuals' well-being and beliefs, highlighting the importance of addressing and preventing this behavior within faith-based communities. It is crucial for individuals to recognize the signs of gaslighting, such as denial, blame-shifting, and shaming, to protect themselves from its harmful impact. For instance, in online discussions related to faith and beliefs, gaslighting may manifest as the constant denial of valid questions or the twisting of a narrative to deflect from the original topic, leaving individuals feeling invalidated and manipulated.

Encouraging individuals to prioritize healthy and respectful discussions in faith-based communities is essential for fostering a supportive and nurturing environment within apologetics and religious discourse. By recognizing and disengaging from gaslighting interactions, individuals can protect their mental and emotional well-being, ultimately promoting a space where open dialogue and understanding can flourish. The call to action is to create an environment where individuals feel safe and respected, enabling constructive conversations and personal growth within the context of apologetics and religious engagement.

Questioning Andrew Soncrant's Pedestrian Explanation of the First Article of Faith

 

 Andrew Soncrant is part of the Reformed Baptist Church Plant, Apologia Church of Utah. This Church and ministry appear to be engaged in toxic apologetics where they manipulate and use deceptive strategies to discredit the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. This particular ministry appears to have an active YouTube channel where videos are posted of conversations, interactions, and brief "challenges" against the LDS Christian Faith. The following is my comment that has gone unresponsive to the apparent and blatant false claims made regarding the first article of faith.  

1) Claim made: LDS article of Faith number one says "We believe in God, the Eternal Father, and in His Son, Jesus Christ, and in the Holy Ghost". Sounds good right? But the truth is that the LDS organization teaches their people to speak "christianese". They say the same words, but they have totally different meanings.

Response to Claim: The idea and belief that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints teaches members to speak "Christianese" is a belief among the more recent evangelical apologists. This is a misnomer by the person speaking.

The first article of faith establishes scriptural truth that we accept and believe in who God the Father, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Spirit are. This is articulated in our understanding that they make up the Godhead - united in purpose and will regarding the plan of salvation. There is no "Christianese" or "mormonese" - except in an irrational and manipulative mindset and belief. 

2) Claim made: "What we should first understand is that when they say God the Eternal Father, they don't mean that he has existed from Everlasting into Everlasting - like it says in Psalm 90."

Response to Claim: Psalm 90 is called the Prayer of Moses and the term Lord in Hebrew is Yahweh. The transliteration of this verse is that Moses is praying to Yahweh - who is Elohim (which has various meanings, one of them referring to royalty or plurality). Yahweh is Jesus Christ. So, what we should first understand is this: we need to properly interpret scripture from an Exegesis standpoint and not an Eisegesis Standpoint. It is Christ who is from everlasting to everlasting. This is what we accept and believe regarding the son. It is also what we accept and believe concerning the father. The term in Psalm 90 "everlasting to everlasting" in Hebrew is olam and means "long duration, antiquity, futurity" and also means something that is perpetual. To this, Latter-day Saints agree. Yahweh - Christ is perpetual, his existence is also of a long duration. 

Also, Psalm 90 coincides with authoritative Jewish understanding of the eternal and pre-existence of things prior to creation. This includes Torah, Repentance, Israel, and God's throne and glory (Bereshit Rabbah 1): 

"In the beginning of God's creating..." - Six things preceded the creation of the world; some of them were created and some of them were decided to be created. The Torah and the Throne of Glory were created. How do we know the Torah was? As it says (Proverbs 8:22): "God made me at the beginning of his way." How do we know the Throne of Glory was? As it says (Psalms 93:2): "Your throne is established as of old etc." The Patriarchs, Israel, the Temple, and the name of the Messiah were decided to be created. How do we know the Patriarchs were? As it says (Hosea 9:10): "Like grapes in the wilderness etc." How do we know Israel was? As it says (Psalms 74:2): "Remember your congregation, whom you purchased from old." How do we know the Temple was? As it says (Jeremiah 17:12): "Your throne of glory, on high from the beginning etc." How do we know the name of the Messiah was? As it says (Psalms 72:17): "May his name exist forever etc. [his name shall be Yinnon as long as the sun]." Rabbi Ahavah said in the name of Rabbi Ze'ira: Even repentance was, as it says (Psalms 90:2): "Before the mountains were birthed," and at the same time (Psalms 90:3), "You turned man to contrition etc." However, I do not know which was first--if the Torah preceded the Throne of Glory or the Throne of Glory preceded the Torah. Rabbi Abba Bar Cahana said: The Torah preceded the Throne of Glory, as it says (Proverbs 8:22): "God made me at the beginning of his way, the first of his works of old." This is before that of which it is written (Psalms 93:2): "Your throne is established as of old." 

So, if you are going to call attention to the fact that we need to understand Psalm 90 - we need to understand it in proper context - not an eisegesis and flippant pedestrian way to disprove the first article of faith. 

3) Claim made: "no, they believe that he was once a man like you, and I are. Someone who sinned, right, but then was obedient to the gospel ordinances and principles that was exalted into Godhood." 

Response to claim: This statement is mere speculation and manipulation of what statements were made. Much of this comes from the couplet of Lorenzo Snow - "As man is, God once was, as God is, man may become". There is not much information concerning the details of God's mortal existence. The reality is - and the point that needs to be made - is that it does not matter. God is our Heavenly Father who sent His son to redeem us so that we are able to be (as the Apostle Paul said) Heirs and Joint heirs with Christ. (See this response)

4) Claim made: "When they say Jesus, they don't mean the eternal God who took on flesh and died on the cross for our sins. Instead, they mean the offspring of Heavenly Father and one of his goddess wives and the brother of lucifer." 

Response: Again, a statement that is not only a strawman fallacy, but also mere speculative and irrational. Latter-day Saints actually do believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of the Living God who did come down and live a mortal life, suffered, died on the cross, was buried, and then rose the third day with a resurrected body of flesh and bone. 

Also, what the individual is teaching here is something that is known as modalism. This doctrine specifically teaches that the persons of the Trinity are merely represented by three modes or aspects of the Divine Being. It denies any distinct or coexisting persons in the divine nature of the Godhead. 

Concerning Christ as being the spirit brother of Lucifer - well.... hmmm let us see.... Scripture refers to Christ as the Morning Star. Scripture also refers to Lucifer as the Morning Star. Scripture calls Christ as a Lion. Scripture also says that Satan is also a Lion. Do we then conclude that Christ is Satan? No, we do not ever dare say such a thing because we understand that these symbolisms are referring to a contrast of two different aspects of the same symbolism. Christ is the morning star as he is the First of all things. Satan is the morning star in that he is a fallen being. Christ is the Lion of Judah whereas Satan is a lion roaring and devouring. 

The fact of the matter is this: the speaker is settling his teaching on a well-known Sabellianism unorthodox teaching as a means to challenge and refute the LDS First Article of Faith. 

5) Claim made: "They also deny the fact that the Holy Ghost is eternally God". 

Response to the Claim: Again, this is mere speculation and faulty assumption devised as a means to deceive and mislead people. Here is a great article regarding the Holy Spirit: 

6) Claim made: "This is a big issue if you do not have Jesus Christ, the Eternal God, is your sacrifice for your sins - you don't have an atonement that actually has any effect on you. That's why the organization says you need to make up those works yourself. You need to do x, y, and z in order to reach a level of exaltation in Godhood. It's not biblical. We must reject it. We must see the Christians for what it is and correct it for the truth." 

Response to the claim: This is a very vague and ambiguous conclusion. What works are you referring to where the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints teach that they need to replace the atonement with? Maybe provide some clarification here. As it is, sounds like you are attempting to shoot blindfolded from the hip without ever hitting the target. Again, deceptive, manipulative, and misleading statements. 

As for the latter statement - yes, we need to correct what someone says and teachings for the sake of Truth. This means correcting your statements and showing how they are in error and the danger you are in for promoting and teaching such things. Are you willing to correct your statements? Are you willing to repent of your deception and manipulation of the teachings of the LDS Faith? Or are you merely another arrogant ignoramus blowhard illiterate scriptorian with pedestrian and flinstonian views that want to garner a following of blind faithful disciples?

Exploring the Divergence: Joseph Smiths First Vision and the Nature of God in Modern Christianity

Introduction

The Nature of God: Exploring the Divergence between Joseph Smith's First Vision and Modern Christianity

The nature of God is a deeply profound and complex topic that has fascinated theologians and believers for centuries. It holds great significance in religious beliefs and shapes the understanding of the divine. In this article, we will delve into the divergence between Joseph Smith's First Vision and modern Christianity regarding the nature of God. We will also explore the controversy surrounding the First Vision and the differences between modern Christian teaching and biblical scripture, shedding light on the various perspectives and interpretations.

The First Vision, as recorded by Joseph Smith, marks a pivotal moment in the history of the Latter-day Saint movement. In the spring of 1820, when he was just 14 years old, Smith went into a grove of trees near his home in upstate New York to pray. During this prayer, he claimed to have had a vision in which he saw two separate and distinct beings - God the Father and Jesus Christ.This profound experience set in motion a chain of events that would ultimately lead to the establishment of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Joseph Smith's First Vision

Joseph Smith's account of the First Vision has been met with controversy and criticism from other Christian denominations. One of the main points of contention is the claim that Smith saw two separate and distinct beings, which some view as contradictory to traditional Christian teachings that emphasize the unity of God. Traditional Christian doctrine teaches that God is one being in three persons - the Father, the Son (Jesus Christ), and the Holy Spirit - commonly referred to as the Holy Trinity.

Critics argue that Smith's vision challenges the traditional understanding of God and raises questions about the nature of the divine. They question whether Smith's vision was a genuine encounter with God or a result of his own imagination. Some also argue that the First Vision is not supported by biblical scripture and that it contradicts the teachings of Jesus and the apostles.

Despite the controversy, the First Vision remains a significant event for Latter-day Saints, as it represents a direct encounter with God and Jesus Christ. It serves as the foundation for their belief in the restoration of the true gospel and the establishment of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The First Vision is considered a divine manifestation that sets the stage for understanding the nature of God according to the teachings of Joseph Smith and his successors.

Modern Christianity's Teaching on the Nature of God

Modern Christian denominations have different beliefs regarding the nature of God, but they all trace their roots back to the Valentinian teaching of the second century. The Valentinians believed that God is incomprehensible, infinite, and encompasses all things. However, different Christian denominations have varied interpretations and understandings of this concept.

For example, the Catholic Church teaches that God is three distinct persons - the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit - who exist in perfect unity and share the same divine essence. They believe that the three persons are co-eternal and co-equal, and that God's nature is beyond human comprehension. The Catholic understanding of God is deeply rooted in scripture and tradition, with emphasis placed on the mystery of the Holy Trinity.

Protestant denominations, on the other hand, generally adhere to the doctrine of the Holy Trinity but may have different emphases and interpretations. Some Protestant groups may focus more on the unity of God, while others may emphasize the distinct roles of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Pentecostal and charismatic Christian groups often emphasize the work and presence of the Holy Spirit in the lives of believers.

To gain a better understanding of the diversity of beliefs among Christian denominations, we can refer to a chart that compares the Second Century Gnostic Valentinian teaching on the nature of God with the beliefs of various Christian denominations. This chart highlights the variations in belief among different Christian groups, showcasing the complexity of interpreting the nature of God within the Christian tradition.

	Second Century Gnostic Valentinian Teaching Valentinians believed that God is incomprehensible and cannot be known directly. Therefore he defies accurate description. He is infinite, without beginning or end and is the ultimate origin of all things. He encompasses all things without being encompassed. Everything including the world lies within the deity and continues to be part of it. The Godhead manifests itself through a process of self-unfolding in the subsequent multiplicity of being while maintaining its unity. Valentinians believed that God is androgynous and frequently depicted him as a male-female dyad. This is related to the notion that God provides the universe with both form and substance. The feminine aspect of the deity is called Silence, Grace and Thought. Silence is God's primordial state of tranquillity and self-awareness She is also the active creative Thought that makes all subsequent states of being (or "Aeons") substantial. The masculine aspect of God is Depth, also called Ineffable and First Father. Depth is the profoundly incomprehensible, all-encompassing aspect of the deity. He is essentially passive, yet when moved to action by his feminine Thought, he gives the universe form. Seventh Day Adventist Teaching
	Seventh-day Adventist teach that there is one God: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, a unity of three co-eternal Persons. God is immortal, all-powerful, all-knowing, above all, and ever present. He is infinite and beyond human comprehension, yet known through His self-revelation. God, who is love, is forever worthy of worship, adoration, and service by the whole creation.
	The fundamental truth of the Orthodox Church is the faith revealed in the True God: the Holy Trinity of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost. The doctrine of the Holy Trinity is in reality the declaration of the Christian faith, formulated and pronounced by the Ecumenical Synods of the One Undivided Church. It is impossible for the finite human mind to comprehend objectively the substance of the True God, true worship, and true norms of life. Human reasoning in regard to faith in the Holy Trinity is confined to formulating the truths which already have been revealed in the Scriptures and Sacred Tradition. These truths of the Holy Trinity were formulated by the First and Second Ecumenical Synods in the Nicene Creed and were based on Divine Sources. Eastern Orthodox Teaching The Orthodox Church believes that God is one in substance and Triune in three Persons or Hypostases. The Church pronounces in its lucid liturgical confession: "I confess the Father and the Son and the Holy Ghost, Trinity consubstantial and undivided." In the Holy Scriptures, there are passages recorded to strengthen this belief in the Holy Trinity in which the faith in God is revealed. The Scriptures proclaim "to us there is but one God, the Father" (1 Cor. 8:6); "in him (the Son) dwelleth all the fullness of the Godhead bodily" (Col. 2:9; cf. Matt. 26:63); and, relating to the Holy Spirit, "thou hast not lied unto men, but unto God" (Acts 5:4). This fundamental belief in the Holy Trinity was the subject of all the Ecumenical Synods in which the unchangeable pronouncement on the Holy Trinity was affirmed. They proclaimed primarily that the second Person of the Holy Trinity, the Logos, and the Third Person, the Holy Spirit, are of the same essence, Homoousios, of the Father. In the personal attributions of the Divine Persons of the Holy Trinity, the Father begot the Son and from the Father proceeds the Holy Spirit. The Son, the Second Person of the Trinity, sends the Holy Spirit to guide His Church (cf. John 15:26). The nature and attributes of the Persons of the Holy Trinity are revealed through Jesus Christ. The truth can be reached only by faith, being above and beyond human comprehension.
	Lutheran Teaching The Being who made the world and man and to whom man is responsible. Man's knowledge of God falls into 2 broad categories: (1) God is known to man through power and design in the natural world and through pattern in the forces of hist. (Ps 19; Acts 17:22–31; Ro 1:18–2:16); man is thereby enabled to construct a mental picture of a supremely powerful Force working out man's destiny with a heavy hand, confronting mankind with continual challenge. Human reactions to this understanding of God result in reverence for nature and idolatry, in attempts to rationalize God into abstract natural law and to remove man's responsibility to Him (2 Ptr 3:3–4), or in despair and fear. This natural knowledge of God, basic to every human system of religion and to most philos., is insufficient for a satisfying and adequate faith in God, who still remains Deus incognitus (the unknown God). Insight into God is not within range of human endowment (Jn 1:18). (2) God revealed Himself to man more clearly and completely by the incarnation* of Christ* Jesus (Deus incarnatus) as a Being infinitely pained by man's deviation from His holiness, yet infinitely desirous to repair the breach, to the point of Himself assuming responsibility for this repair at the cost of His own sacrifice. Thus God is revealed as perfect and holy, as personal and driven by love to conform man to the image of His Son (Ro 8:29). This revelation* of God in His Son is communicated through the written Word (see Word of God). This Word presents more data about His nature, which are intelligible and credible to us, however, only in the light of the central revelation in Christ Jesus, the Word of God (Deus revelatus). God is eternal, not subject to time (Ps 90:1–4; 2 Ptr 3:8). God is neither confined to space or time nor limited in power, knowledge, or wisdom. He is benevolent, inasmuch as He desires to bless the objects to His love. All resources of God are at the disposal of man in Christ (Ph 4:13) and are recognized by him to work for his good (Ro 8:24–39). A Christian's insight into God and his power to grasp and to trust in God as his forgiving and enabling Father is the work of God Himself, the gift of the Holy* Spirit. The Christian church* summarized the nature of God and a Christian's knowledge of God in the concept of the Trinity.* RRC
	Methodist Teaching When we say the Apostles' Creed, we join with millions of Christians through the ages in an understanding of God as a Trinity—three persons in one: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. God, who is one, is revealed in three distinct persons. "God in three persons, blessed Trinity" is one way of speaking about the several ways we experience God. We also try to find adjectives that describe the divine nature. In our Articles of Religion and Confession of Faith, we affirm God is "everlasting" and "infinite" in "power, wisdom, justice, goodness, and love." Because we cannot speak literally about God, we use metaphors: God is a Shepherd, a Bridegroom, a Judge. God is Love or Light or Truth. Presbyterians Teaching The Scot's Confession
	We confess and acknowledge one God alone, to whom alone we must cleave, whom alone we must serve, whom only we must worship, and in whom alone we put our trust. Who is eternal, infinite, immeasur-able, incomprehensible, omnipotent, invisible; one in substance and yet distinct in three persons, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost. By whom we confess and believe all things in heaven and earth, visible and invisible, to have been created, to be retained in their being, and to be ruled and guided by his inscrutable providence for such end as his eter-nal wisdom, goodness, and justice have appointed, and to the manifes-tation of his own glory. Roman Catholicism Teaching
	228 "Hear, O Israel, the LORD our God is one LORD. . ." (Dt 6:4; Mk 12:29). "The supreme being must be unique, without equal. . . If God is not one, he is not God" (Tertullian, Adv. Marc., 1, 3, 5: PL 2, 274). 229 Faith in God leads us to turn to him alone as our first origin and our ultimate goal, and neither to prefer anything to him nor to substitute anything for him. 230 Even when he reveals himself, God remains a mystery beyond words: "If you understood him, it would not be God" (St. Augustine, Sermo 52, 6, 16: PL 38, 360 and Sermo 117, 3, 5: PL 38, 663). 231 The God of our faith has revealed himself as HE WHO IS; and he has made himself known as "abounding in steadfast love and faithfulness" (Ex 34:6). God's very being is Truth and Love. Unitarians Teaching
	Unitarian Universalists have many ways of naming what is sacred. Some believe in a God; some don’t believe in a God. Some believe in a sacred force at work in the world, and call it “love,” “mystery,” “source of all” or “spirit of life.” We are thousands of individuals of all ages, each influenced by our cultures and life experiences to understand “the ground of our being” in our own way. Evangelical Christianity Teaching
	There is one God, and the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit are all God. This is clear in the Scripture, and while it may be mysterious to us, it is the objective claim of the Bible. The first Christians understood the importance of retaining this truth about God in order to retain the true identity of Jesus. When early Christians tried to maintain the oneness of God without regard to the Divine description of Jesus and the Holy Spirit as we’ve just described, they usually redefined (and mischaracterized) Jesus as a human, limited, or finite creature. But, if Jesus is not God in every sense of the word (as the Bible claims), then He does not have the power to save us on the Cross. If Jesus is not God Incarnate, then he simply cannot take our place and bestow upon us the righteousness of God. For this reason, the earliest leaders were very careful to describe the triune nature of God as seen in the Bible. They eventually described God as one in substance, essence or nature, while being distinctly but undividedly three in person.

It is important to note that this chart is not exhaustive and only provides a general overview of some of the major denominations and their beliefs. There are many other Christian denominations and groups with their own unique beliefs and interpretations of the nature of God. The nature of God is a complex and multifaceted concept that continues to be explored and understood in different ways by diverse Christian communities.

The Beliefs of Latter-day Saints

In addition to the divergences between Joseph Smith's First Vision and modern Christianity, it is important to understand the beliefs of Mormons regarding the nature of God and the Godhead. Mormons, also known as members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, have distinctive beliefs that set them apart from mainstream Christian denominations.

Latter-day Saints believe in the Godhead, which is comprised of three separate and distinct personages - the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. They believe that God is the Father of our spirits and that He has a glorified, resurrected body of flesh and bones. This belief is based on their interpretation of scripture, including revelations received by Joseph Smith.

According to LDS theology, the Father and the Son are separate beings, with the Son serving as the mediator between God and humanity. The Holy Spirit is also a distinct personage who acts as a guide and comforter to individuals. Mormons believe that they can become like God and participate in the divine nature through a process called exaltation, which includes the potential for eternal progression and the ability to create worlds and populate them.

The beliefs of Latter-day Saints regarding the nature of God and the Godhead have been a subject of controversy and debate within the larger Christian community. Critics argue that these beliefs deviate from traditional Christian teachings on the nature of God and the Trinity. However, Latter-day Saints maintain that their beliefs are rooted in scripture and modern-day revelations, and they view themselves as restorationists, seeking to restore the original teachings and practices of early Christianity.

Knowing and understanding the beliefs of Latter-day Saints regarding the nature of God contributes to a broader understanding of the diversity within the Christian faith and the various interpretations of the divine across different religious traditions.

Knowing God and Jesus Christ

No matter the specific theological beliefs held by different Christian denominations, one aspect that unites them is the recognition of the importance of knowing God and Jesus Christ. The question of why knowing God and Jesus Christ is considered essential for eternal life is a central theme within Christianity.

Knowing God and Jesus Christ is not merely an intellectual pursuit; it is a deeply personal and transformative experience. It involves developing a relationship with the divine through prayer, scripture study, and personal revelation. Christians believe that a personal relationship with God is vital for spiritual growth and salvation.

In the Bible, Jesus Himself emphasizes the significance of knowing Him, stating, "This is eternal life, that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent" (John 17:3). This verse highlights the intimate connection between knowing God and Jesus and attaining eternal life. Christians believe that eternal life is not just an existence that extends beyond mortality but a quality of life that is intimately connected to the divine.

Knowing God and Jesus Christ allows individuals to align their will with God's will and to experience the transformative power of His love and grace. It involves surrendering oneself to God's guidance and seeking to live in harmony with His teachings. This knowledge is not limited to intellectual understanding but encompasses a deep and personal relationship with the divine.

Through knowing God and Jesus Christ, individuals can find purpose, meaning, and fulfillment in their lives. They can experience the joy and peace that comes from living in accordance with God's plan. This knowledge is not just theoretical but is meant to be lived out in daily life, shaping one's thoughts, actions, and relationships.

The importance of knowing God and Jesus Christ extends beyond this earthly life. Christians believe that knowing the divine is a prerequisite for eternal life, the ultimate goal of human existence. It is through this knowledge and relationship that individuals can experience the fullness of life in communion with God for all eternity.

Obedience to God's Commandments

An essential aspect of knowing and experiencing the nature of God is obedience to His commandments. Obedience is not viewed as a burden or a means to earn salvation but as a pathway to harmony with God. By aligning one's will with God's will through obedience, individuals can draw closer to Him and experience the blessings that come from living in accordance with His teachings.

Obedience to God's commandments is a central theme in both the Old and New Testaments. In the Bible, Jesus teaches, "If you love me, you will keep my commandments" (John 14:15). This verse underscores the connection between love for God and obedience to His commandments. Obedience is seen as an expression of love and devotion to God.

When individuals choose to follow God's commandments, they demonstrate their trust in His wisdom and guidance. They acknowledge that God's ways are higher than their own and that His commandments are given for their benefit. Obedience enables individuals to live in harmony with God's divine plan and experience the blessings that flow from aligning their lives with His teachings.

By obeying God's commandments, individuals not only draw closer to Him but also cultivate virtues such as humility, selflessness, and compassion. These virtues reflect the character of God and contribute to personal growth and spiritual development. Obedience is not simply about adhering to a set of rules but about cultivating a heart that desires to live in accordance with God's will.

It is important to note that obedience is not synonymous with perfection. Christians believe that all individuals fall short of God's perfect standard and are in need of His grace and forgiveness. Obedience is a lifelong journey of learning, growth, and transformation, guided by the knowledge of God's love and the desire to live in a way that is pleasing to Him.

In summary, obedience to God's commandments is a means of drawing closer to Him, aligning one's will with His, and experiencing the blessings that come from living in harmony with His teachings. It is an expression of love and trust in God's wisdom and guidance, leading to personal transformation and a deeper understanding of the nature of God.

Comparison between True Scriptural Authority and Modern Christianity

A significant point of divergence between Joseph Smith's First Vision and modern Christianity is the question of scriptural authority. Modern Christian doctrine on the nature of God is often contrasted with the teachings of the Bible, which is considered the authoritative source of divine revelation for Christians.

In examining the nature of God, it is important to distinguish between true scriptural authority and modern Christian teachings that may deviate from or contradict biblical scripture. The comparison between these two reveals discrepancies and contradictions that have arisen over time.

Modern Christianity's doctrine on the nature of God is rooted in the Valentinian teaching of the second century. The Valentinians believed that God is incomprehensible, infinite, and encompasses all things. This belief influenced subsequent theological developments within Christianity.

However, critics argue that the Valentinian teaching deviates from the biblical understanding of God. They maintain that the Valentinian perspective, which emphasizes God's incomprehensibility, diminishes the biblical portrayal of God's holiness, sovereignty, and other attributes.

True scriptural authority, as recognized by many Christians, is derived from the Bible itself. The Bible reveals God's nature through His names, His attributes, and His actions. It provides insights into the character of God and His relationship with humanity.

Throughout the Old Testament, God reveals Himself through various names, each conveying a different aspect of His nature. For example, Elohim emphasizes God's power and might, while Yahweh highlights His personal presence and covenant relationship with His people. These names reveal different dimensions of God's nature and provide a glimpse into His character.

The attributes of God revealed in Scripture are numerous and multifaceted. They include His holiness, sovereignty, omnipotence, immutability, and omniscience, among others. These attributes are essential to understanding the nature of God and His relationship with the world.

God's holiness is the most important element of His nature. It sets Him apart from His creation and emphasizes His purity and moral perfection. His sovereignty underscores His absolute authority over the universe, while His omnipotence reflects His unlimited power and ability. God's immutability highlights His unchanging nature, instilling confidence and trust in His faithfulness. Lastly, His omniscience reveals His perfect knowledge and understanding of all things.

In contrast to the Valentinian teaching, true scriptural authority emphasizes the holiness, sovereignty, and other attributes of God as revealed in the Bible. It upholds the integrity and reliability of biblical scripture as the authoritative source of divine revelation. The divergence between modern Christian teachings and true scriptural authority underscores the importance of studying and interpreting the Bible within its historical and literary context.

In conclusion, understanding the true nature of God is a multifaceted and complex endeavor. It involves examining the teachings of Joseph Smith's First Vision, the beliefs of modern Christianity, and the authority of biblical scripture. While there may be divergences and controversies, the quest to comprehend the nature of God remains a fundamental aspect of religious exploration and spiritual growth.

Attributes of God

The attributes of God offer further insights into His nature and character. These attributes help believers develop a deeper understanding of God and His relationship with the world. In this section, we will explore some of the main attributes of God according to the Bible and Christian theology.

God's holiness is the most important element of His nature. It is the quality that sets Him apart from His creation. God's holiness signifies His moral purity and perfection. It highlights His complete separation from sin and evil. The Bible states, "Exalt the LORD our God; worship at his footstool! Holy is he!" (Psalm 99:5). God's holiness demands reverence and awe from His creation.

God's sovereignty is another vital attribute. It refers to His absolute authority and control over all things. God's sovereignty is expressed through His omnipotence, which denotes His unlimited power and ability. The Bible states, "The LORD reigns; he is robed in majesty; the LORD is robed; he has put on strength as his belt" (Psalm 93:1). God's sovereignty assures believers that He is in control of every aspect of creation and history.

Furthermore, God's immutability is an attribute that highlights His unchanging nature. In a world of constant change, God remains steadfast and faithful. The Bible declares, "For I the LORD do not change; therefore you, O children of Jacob, are not consumed" (Malachi 3:6). This attribute provides believers with a sense of security and trust in God's promises.

God's omniscience is an attribute that reveals His perfect knowledge and understanding of all things. He knows the past, present, and future, including the thoughts and intentions of every individual. The psalmist declares, "Great is our Lord, and abundant in power; his understanding is beyond measure" (Psalm 147:5). God's omniscience demonstrates His wisdom and enables Him to guide His creation with perfect knowledge.

These attributes, among others, provide a glimpse into the nature of God. They help believers develop a deeper appreciation for His character and inspire reverence and worship. The attributes of God reveal His greatness, majesty, and love for His creation. They remind believers of His faithfulness, goodness, and unfailing presence in their lives.

In summary, the attributes of God, including His holiness, sovereignty, immutability, and omniscience, provide insights into His nature and character. These attributes help believers develop a deeper understanding of God and His relationship with the world. They inspire awe, reverence, and gratitude, and serve as a foundation for faith and worship,

The Holy Trinity in Christianity

The concept of the Holy Trinity is a fundamental aspect of Christian theology. It refers to the belief in one God who exists in three distinct persons: the Father, the Son (Jesus Christ), and the Holy Spirit. The Triune nature of God is complex and mysterious, and has been a subject of study and contemplation for centuries.

The Holy Trinity is rooted in the Bible, although the term "Trinity" is not explicitly mentioned. The concept is derived from various biblical passages that reveal the coexistence and unity of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. For example, Jesus instructs His disciples, "Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit" (Matthew 28:19). This verse highlights the threefold nature of God.

The Holy Trinity is often depicted using the analogy of water - water can exist in three forms: solid (ice), liquid (water), and gas (vapor), yet it remains the same substance. Similarly, God exists as three distinct persons while sharing the same divine essence. Each person of the Trinity is fully God and possesses the divine attributes.

The Father is often understood as the Creator and Sustainer of the universe. The Son, Jesus Christ, is believed to be the incarnation of God who entered human history to redeem humanity through His life, death, and resurrection. The Holy Spirit is seen as the presence of God in the world, guiding, empowering, and transforming believers.

The Triune nature of God is a mystery that defies complete human comprehension. It reveals the complexity and depth of God's nature, emphasizing His unity and diversity. The Holy Trinity is a central and distinctive feature of Christian belief, highlighting the relational aspect of God and His desire for fellowship with humanity.

While the concept of the Holy Trinity is widely accepted within mainstream Christianity, it has been a subject of debate and controversy throughout history. Various heresies and challenges have emerged, questioning the nature and relationship of the three persons of the Trinity.Nevertheless, the belief in the Holy Trinity remains a defining characteristic of Christian theology, shaping the understanding of God's nature and His interaction with the world.

Beliefs on Hell and Eternal Punishment

The topic of Hell and eternal punishment is one that has been the subject of differing beliefs among Christians. While there is general agreement that Hell is a place of punishment for those who reject God, there are varying interpretations of its nature and duration.

Some Christians believe in the existence of Hell as a place of eternal punishment. They interpret biblical passages that describe Hell as a place of unending suffering and separation from God. These believers view Hell as a necessary consequence of rejecting God's offer of salvation and eternal life.

On the other hand, there are Christians who believe in the concept of temporary punishment or annihilationism. According to this view, Hell is a place of punishment, but the duration of the punishment is not eternal. Instead, individuals who end up in Hell will eventually be annihilated or cease to exist.

There is also a belief among certain Christians that Hell does not exist at all. This perspective, often associated with universalism or Christian universalism, suggests that all individuals will ultimately be reconciled to God and experience salvation, regardless of their beliefs or actions in this life.

The differing beliefs on Hell and eternal punishment arise from different interpretations of biblical passages and theological perspectives. Christians who believe in eternal punishment highlight verses such as Matthew 25:46, which states, "And these will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life." They argue that the use of the word "eternal" emphasizes the everlasting nature of the punishment.

Those who hold to temporary punishment or annihilationism point to passages that speak of the destruction or annihilation of the wicked. They interpret these verses as indicating that the punishment in Hell is not eternal but finite.

While the topic of Hell and eternal punishment can be divisive, it is important to recognize that the ultimate judgment and fate of individuals rest with God. Christians are called to focus on spreading the message of God's love and grace, and to trust in His justice and mercy.

In summary, Christians hold varying beliefs regarding the existence and nature of Hell, as well as the duration of punishment. These differences arise from different interpretations of biblical passages and theological perspectives. While the topic of Hell is significant within Christian theology, the focus remains on the offer of salvation and the call to live in accordance with God's teachings.

Conclusion

The nature of God is a topic that has captivated theologians, believers, and seekers throughout history. It is a subject of profound significance and deep reflection within religious traditions. In this article, we have explored the divergence between Joseph Smith's First Vision and modern Christianity regarding the nature of God. We have discussed the controversy surrounding the First Vision and the differences between modern Christian teaching and biblical scripture.

Joseph Smith's First Vision, though met with controversy and criticism, remains a significant event for Latter-day Saints. It serves as the foundation for their belief in the restoration of the true gospel and the establishment of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The vision, which involved the appearance of God the Father and Jesus Christ as separate beings, challenges traditional Christian teachings on the unity of God.

Modern Christianity's teaching on the nature of God stems from the Valentinian teaching of the second century. Different Christian denominations have varied beliefs and interpretations, but they all trace their roots back to this ancient perspective. The Catholic Church emphasizes the mystery of the Holy Trinity, while Protestant denominations may have different emphases and interpretations.

Additionally, we have explored the beliefs of Mormons regarding the nature of God and the Godhead. Mormons believe in the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit as separate and distinct personages. They view God as the Father of their spirits and believe in the potential for eternal progression and the ability to become like God.

Knowing God and Jesus Christ is considered essential for eternal life in Christianity. It involves developing a personal relationship with the divine and aligning one's will with God's will. Obedience to God's commandments plays a crucial role in this process, bringing individuals into harmony with Him.

Furthermore, we have examined the comparison between true scriptural authority and modern Christianity's doctrine on the nature of God. By studying the attributes of God revealed in Scripture, such as His holiness, sovereignty, immutability, and omniscience, we gain a deeper understanding of His nature.

The concept of the Holy Trinity in Christianity, while complex and mysterious, highlights the unity and diversity of God. It reveals the relational aspect of God and His desire for fellowship with humanity.

Lastly, we have explored the differing beliefs among Christians regarding Hell and eternal punishment. While there are varying interpretations, the focus remains on God's justice and mercy, and the offer of salvation through Jesus Christ.

In conclusion, the nature of God is a profound and multifaceted topic that continues to be explored and understood in different ways. It is a subject that invites contemplation, reflection, and a deeper relationship with the divine. Whether through the lens of Joseph Smith's First Vision, the teachings of modern Christianity, or the attributes revealed in Scripture, the nature of God remains an essential aspect of religious faith and spiritual growth,.