Biblical Insights on Personal Revelation and Criticism

 

Jethro advising Moses (detail), Jan van Bronchorst, 1659. Royal Palace of Amsterdam, Wikimedia

The concept of personal revelation is not unique to the faith of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS). It is a foundational principle found throughout religious history, including within the Bible itself. Yet, critics of the LDS faith frequently dismiss or invalidate personal revelation or visions, often applying misinterpretations or double standards in their critique. One such example can be seen in a recent blog post by Life After Ministry titled “Visions and Revelation.” This post exemplifies their typical approach—using manipulative language and presenting a one-sided argument devoid of context or fairness.

In our look at the Church’s teachings on personal revelation, we’re wondering how someone can interpret if their revelations are correct through the lens of God’s word. This also serves as a good reminder of how the Lord has always kept His promise and speaks to us today just as He did in the beginning of time.

What a relief! What a relief it is for me and other ex-cultists knowing we have something to rely upon that isn’t filtered through someone else’s poor interpretation!

The Lord in His brilliant delivery used simple statements to ensure us His word will be the same for eternity. Thank You Lord! Our hearts grieve that Mormons have adopted the poor explanation of why they’ve rejected Jesus and His infallible word.

Ask the Mormon this: if someone said something bad about someone you loved, does their opinion make the statement true? If it doesn’t, then why would someone’s poor translation of the Bible mean the original writings can’t be trusted?

Ask who made the errors, where are the contradictions in the original writings, and when did this happen. Be specific.

Are you as a Mormon positive that Joseph Smith’s original writings are still intact? Are you aware there are at least 11 versions of Joe Smith’s first vision, and they contradict themselves?

From the outset, the blog post takes a dismissive tone. First, it cites Isaiah 40:8—"The grass withereth, the flower fadeth: but the word of our God shall stand forever"—without offering any meaningful commentary or exploration of its context. This selective use of scripture is presented as a blanket dismissal of the LDS understanding of revelation, assuming without justification that modern revelation cannot coexist with the enduring truth of God’s word. However, such an interpretation overlooks the broader biblical precedent for ongoing communication between God and His children, as seen in the experiences of prophets and apostles throughout scripture.

Second, the author attempts to undermine the LDS perspective by asserting that personal revelation or visions within the faith are based on faulty interpretation. Their argument assumes that members of the Church are either deceived or brainwashed, simply because their spiritual experiences do not align with the author’s particular reading of the Bible. This perspective not only begs the question but also imposes an interpretive framework that privileges one group’s understanding of scripture over all others, without addressing the legitimacy of alternate perspectives.

The blog post also shifts the discussion toward the concepts of biblical inerrancy and infallibility, common tenets among many evangelical Christians. The author’s position becomes evident in their conclusion: “Thank you, Lord! Our hearts grieve that Mormons have adopted the poor explanation of why they've rejected Jesus and His infallible word.” Such language reflects not only a misunderstanding of LDS theology but also a narrow view of what constitutes a valid relationship with Christ and His teachings.

In a further attempt to discredit LDS beliefs, the author poses a rhetorical question: “How acceptable is it for someone to say something bad about someone you loved? Does their opinion make the statement true? If it doesn’t, then why would someone’s poor translation of the Bible mean the original writings can’t be trusted?” While this question appears to challenge the LDS view of scripture, it is, in fact, a classic example of a logical fallacy. By presupposing the inerrancy of the Bible and the exclusivity of their interpretive lens, the author manipulates the reader into equating disagreement with deception. This approach leaves no room for honest dialogue or critical examination of the doctrine of biblical inerrancy itself.

Critics such as the author of this blog often fail to recognize the inherent double standard in their reasoning. The very question they pose to members of the LDS faith can just as easily be turned back on them: “If you are saying something bad about someone else—Latter-day Saints and their leaders—does your opinion make such statements true? If it is shown to be false or misinformed due to your poor interpretation, then how can anything you present be trusted?” This reversal highlights the lack of intellectual charity in their critique and challenges the integrity of their arguments.

Ultimately, the issue is not whether personal revelation or visions are valid, but whether critics are willing to engage in an honest exploration of these experiences. The biblical record is replete with examples of God revealing His will through personal communication. To dismiss this principle outright is to deny the richness of God’s relationship with humanity. Instead of condemning those who testify of personal revelation, critics might do well to consider the broader question: If God has spoken in the past, is it not possible that He continues to speak today?

The discussion surrounding personal revelation should invite deeper reflection and meaningful dialogue, not divisive rhetoric or manipulative tactics. It is through mutual respect and a genuine pursuit of truth that we can hope to understand one another’s faith and experiences more fully.

Understanding Personal Revelation

Latter-day Saints agree with Christians where personal revelation is a deeply spiritual communion with God and delivered through the Holy Spirit. It is through this process where individuals are able to receive clarity and direction. It is a keystone of the spiritual disciplines of a genuine disciple of Christ. Coupled with reading, studying, and pondering the scriptures.

Cornerstone to the Latter-day Saint Christian faith and theology is personal revelation. This idea emphasizes how individuals are able to receive divine direction and guidance through the power and gift of the Holy Spirit. Speaking to the disciples - Christ taught that when he the, Spirit of truth, shall come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come (John 16:13, KJV). The context of this passage is Christ is revealing to the disciples that he will returning back to the Father. This revelation seemed to cause the disciples consternation. However, he promised that he will send the Comforter.

Christ gives reason for sending the comforter:

• Will come to reprove the world of sin
• Will come to reveal path of righteousness
• Will come with judgment

The Savior gives reason for this: First, the Holy Spirit will come to reprove sin because of unbelief in who Christ is and the lack of believing on Christ; Second, of righteousness because Christ will return to the father and the Holy Spirit - or the Comforter - will continue to guide the disciples on the path of righteousness; and Third, will come in judgment because the prince of the present world is judged. Christ further shares this:

I have many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now. Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come. He shall glorify me: for he shall receive of mine, and shall shew it unto you. All thins that the Father hath are mine: therefore said I, that he shall take of mine, and shall shew it unto you. (John 16:5-16, KJV).

It is this promise of the Holy Spirit that we find throughout scripture: Joel 2:28-32; John 14:15-26; Acts 2:1-13; Acts 10:44-48; Acts 19:1-7. And it is the purpose and mission of the Holy Spirit is to reveal unto humanity, and affirm, the truth of God. Greek for truth in this passage is alethia and implies more than a factual accuracy, it implies a divine reality. This divine reality suggests a new era in God's redemptive plan, where the Spirit will dwell within believers and guiding them in understanding how to live out God's truth. It is this understanding where divine personal revelation is important to the Christian.

Divine Personal Revelation Through the Holy Spirit

Divine personal revelation, as received through the Holy Spirit, refers to the profound and transformative reality that individuals can experience direct guidance, inspiration, and insight from God. This sacred connection enables individuals to:

1. Be Led, Guided, and Shown the Way
   Through the Holy Spirit, believers gain an assurance of faith that fosters spiritual growth and a deeper understanding of God’s truth. This truth encompasses the full revelation of God’s will and purpose, as unveiled in scripture and exemplified in the life and teachings of Jesus Christ. It is an ongoing, personal guidance that ensures those who faithfully follow Christ are never left to navigate their spiritual journey alone. The Spirit’s influence illuminates the path of righteousness, providing clarity amidst confusion and direction in times of uncertainty.
2. Receive Conviction of Sin Leading to Repentance and Forgiveness
   The Holy Spirit plays a crucial role in convicting individuals of sin, acting as a divine catalyst for repentance and spiritual transformation. This conviction occurs in two significant ways:
   • For Those Yet to Come to Faith: The Holy Spirit works to convict individuals of their transgressions, leading them to a state of godly sorrow and contrition. This is often the pivotal moment of spiritual awakening, where individuals feel deeply “pricked in their hearts” and are drawn to seek reconciliation with God.
   • For Believers Who Stray: For those already walking in faith, the Spirit offers gentle, corrective reminders when they deviate from God’s teachings. This conviction is not punitive but restorative, encouraging humility, repentance, and a return to obedience. However, as Ephesians 4:29-32 warns, persistent disobedience and unrepentant attitudes grieve the Holy Spirit, which may result in His withdrawal, leaving individuals to face the consequences of their choices without divine guidance.
3. Facilitate Spiritual Growth Toward Holiness
   The Holy Spirit dwells within believers, empowering them to grow spiritually and become a “holy and righteous” people (1 Peter 2:24). This transformative process, known as sanctification, involves being conformed to the image and likeness of Christ (Romans 8:29). As the Spirit works within, believers become living temples of God, sanctified vessels through which His presence resides and operates.
4. Reveal God’s Will and Plan
   According to 1 Corinthians 2:10-11, those who come to faith and receive the gift of the Holy Spirit gain the capacity to discern and understand God’s will. The Holy Spirit, as the source of divine wisdom, power, and authority, enables individuals to receive personal revelation. This divine insight equips believers to fulfill their purpose and participate in God’s work. Jesus Himself acknowledged the necessity of the Spirit’s power and authority in His followers’ lives. He promised that the Holy Spirit would empower them to minister effectively in His name. Paul emphasizes this truth in his letter to the Gentile Christians in Ephesus, highlighting the Spirit’s role in granting wisdom and revelation (Ephesians 1:17-20). Through the Spirit, believers gain access to the strength and insight required to carry out God’s mission.

Scripture Reading, Prayer, and Faithful Obedience

A keystone for receiving personal revelation—even heavenly visions—lies in practicing spiritual disciplines: scripture reading, prayer (often coupled with fasting), and faithful obedience. These practices unlock the divine potential to receive sacred, personal guidance in our lives. This does not involve substituting scripture or redefining doctrine; rather, it enhances our understanding of how God’s teachings apply personally to us. Elder Richard G. Scott captured this beautifully¹:

“The feeling of peace is the most common confirming witness that I personally experience. When I have been very concerned about an important matter, struggling to resolve it without success, I continued those efforts in faith. Later, an all-pervading peace has come, settling my concerns, as He has promised.”

This peace, often accompanying personal revelation, is consistent with scripture. In Doctrine and Covenants 6:23, the Lord reminded Oliver Cowdery how He had spoken peace to his mind about a specific matter. Similarly, in Doctrine and Covenants 8:2–3, the Lord explained how revelation is received:

"I will tell you in your mind and in your heart by the Holy Ghost, which shall come upon you and which shall dwell in your heart. Now behold, this is the spirit of revelation; behold, this is the spirit by which Moses brought the children of Israel through the Red Sea on dry ground."

Elder David A. Bednar confirmed that revelation often comes as inspired thoughts to the mind and feelings to the heart². Doctrine and Covenants 11:13 and Mosiah 4:20 further emphasize that these impressions enlighten the mind and fill the heart with joy. Joseph Smith described it as a flood of pure intelligence, manifesting as sudden strokes of ideas:

“A person may profit by noticing the first intimation of the spirit of revelation; for instance, when you feel pure intelligence flowing into you, it may give you sudden strokes of ideas, so that by noticing it, you may find it fulfilled the same day or soon; (i.e.) those things that were presented unto your minds by the Spirit of God, will come to pass; and thus by learning the Spirit of God and understanding it, you may grow into the principle of revelation, until you become perfect in Christ Jesus.”

Addressing Misconceptions About Personal Revelation

One frequent criticism of Latter-day Saint Christians involves the concept of the "burning in the bosom." Critics often reference Jeremiah 17:9—“The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?”—to dismiss the validity of personal revelation, particularly as it pertains to confirming the truthfulness of the Book of Mormon, Joseph Smith’s prophetic calling, and the Restoration. These arguments attempt to reduce genuine spiritual experiences to mere emotional reactions, insisting that feelings are inherently deceptive.

However, this interpretation of Jeremiah 17:9 misses the broader context. A careful exegesis reveals that the verse addresses Judah’s sin of idolatry and the consequences of departing from God’s ways. The chapter contrasts those who trust in man with those who trust in God. Verses 7–8 promise blessings for those who place their trust in the Lord:

“Blessed is the man that trusteth in the Lord, and whose hope the Lord is. For he shall be as a tree planted by the waters, and that spreadeth out her roots by the river, and shall not see when heat cometh, but her leaf shall be green; and shall not be careful in the year of drought, neither shall cease from yielding fruit.”

This imagery of a tree rooted by rivers of water aligns closely with Psalm 1:1–3:

“Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor standeth in the way of sinners, nor sitteth in the seat of the scornful. But his delight is in the law of the LORD; and in his law doth he meditate day and night. And he shall be like a tree planted by the rivers of water, that bringeth forth his fruit in his season; his leaf also shall not wither; and whatsoever he doeth shall prosper.”

This passage beautifully illustrates the transformative power of rooting ourselves in God’s word. A tree planted by rivers of water not only survives but thrives, regardless of external conditions. Similarly, those who immerse themselves in scripture and prayer are spiritually sustained, even amidst life's trials. The promise is clear: meditating on God’s law produces spiritual fruit, resilience, and prosperity.

Meditation, in this context, is not passive reflection but an active engagement with God’s word. It requires pondering, applying, and internalizing scripture until it becomes a source of daily strength and guidance. As we do so, personal revelation flows more freely, and the Holy Spirit illuminates the path we are to walk.

Far from being an abstract concept, this principle has practical applications. Personal revelation strengthens faith, clarifies decisions, and provides comfort during uncertainty. The more consistently we engage in scripture study, prayer, and faithful obedience, the more attuned we become to the voice of the Spirit. In moments of doubt or spiritual drought, these disciplines anchor us, allowing us to draw deeply from the living waters of Christ’s love and guidance.

Thus, the "burning in the bosom" and other forms of spiritual confirmation are not emotional deceptions but divine gifts. They are the fruits of a life rooted in faith, scripture, and obedience, ensuring we remain steadfast in the face of worldly challenges.

"Did our hearts not burn within us?" Luke 24:32

On the road to Emmaus two disciples were traveling days after the crucifixion of Christ. While one of the disciples remained unnamed, the other is known as Cleopas - or Alpheus, and quite possibly the brother of Joseph, Christ's supposed father. Along their journey, a third man joined them. The discussion focused on the life and ministry of Jesus and how he may still be alive after his tomb was found empty. This Biblical narrative is one of three resurrection appearances recorded in the Gospel of Luke.

Geographically, Emmaus is approximately 7 miles from Jerusalem. And this narrative takes place on the very day of Christ's resurrection. It is during this conversation where the Savior cited scriptures:

And beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, he explained to them what was said in the scriptures concerning himself. As they approached the village to which they were going, Jesus continued on as if he were going farther. But they urged him strongly, "Stay with us, for it is nearly evening; the day is almost over." So he went in to stay with them. When he was at the table with them, he took bread, gave thanks, broke it and began to give it to them. Then their eyes were opened and they recognized him, and he disappeared from their sight. They asked each other, "were not our hearts burning within us while he talked with us on the road and opened the scriptures unto us?"

John Gill's commentary explains this verse³:

And they said one to another After Christ was gone, being surprised at what happened, that they should not know him all that while; and that as soon as they did, he should disappear, or withdraw himself in this manner: did not our hearts burn within us while he talked with us by the way, and while he opened to us the Scriptures? concerning himself, his sufferings, death, and resurrection, which are in Moses, the Prophets, and the Psalms.

The Scriptures are as a sealed book to men, learned and unlearned; and none so fit to open them as the lion of the tribe of Judah: he did open and explain them to these his disciples, as well as conversed with them about other things, as they travelled together; and his words came with such evidence, power, and sweetness, that they were ravished with them; their minds were irradiated with beams and rays of divine light; their hearts were warmed and glowed within them; they became fervent in spirit, and their affections were raised and fired; they found the word to be as burning fire within them; and they now knew somewhat what it was to be baptized with fire, which is Christ's peculiar office to administer; see ( Psalms 39:3 ) ( Jeremiah 20:9 ) they seem as it were not only to reflect on these things with wonder and pleasure, but also to charge themselves with want of thought, with inattention and stupidity; since they might have concluded from the uncommon evidence, force, and energy with which his words came to them, who he was, seeing no man could speak as he did, and with such effect as his words had.

It is through study and meditation upon God's word where one experiences a glowing heart. One aspect of this, according to Clarke's commentary⁴, reflects the nature of one's heart being veiled or blinded and then receiving revelation through scripture where a person's mind and heart are open in receiving wisdom and direction.

Dallin H. Oaks offers insight regarding what this burning in the bosom is whereby a person receives a sense of peace, warmth, serenity, and goodness⁵. Furthermore, this idea is one that Christ reveals as something feeling right where there is a strong conviction (Doctrine and Covenants 9:8). It is a feeling that is accompanied by a strong conviction motivating one to take necessary action. A gentle nudge or impression.

Often times, I have experienced this in multiple ways, each moment leaving a profound impact on my life. One remarkable moment was when I had left the LDS Faith and attended an Assemblies of God Church in search of solace and community. There, I worked as the custodian for the church, which allowed me to immerse myself in a new environment and meet diverse individuals who offered perspectives different from my own. I was distraught over a phone conversation I had with my father that was quite upsetting, feeling as if the bond we once shared was fraying. When others saw how upset I was, they inquired with genuine concern, prompting me to open up just a little. I shared some of what happened, however, I felt dismissed and that left me frustrated, as if my emotions were invalidated by those who didn’t truly understand my struggle.

Seeking a moment of peace, I stepped out of the church and sat on the front steps, feeling the weight of my thoughts pressing down on me. Suddenly, a vehicle drove past, made a U-turn, and a young man quickly came up to me and sat next to me without hesitation. All I remember is what he said, "The spirit asked me to turn around and come here where you are," words that resonated deeply within me at that moment. His simple yet profound statement brought a wave of comfort and understanding, a feeling filled with conviction that perhaps I was not alone after all, and that there were still connections to be made in the midst of my turmoil.

Isaiah 40:8: The Eternal Word of God

Isaiah 40:8 states: "The grass withereth, the flower fadeth: but the word of our God shall stand for ever." Critics often use this verse to assert the inerrancy of the Bible, positing that it emphasizes the unchangeable nature of God's word. However, an exegetical examination reveals a deeper layer of meaning where "the word of our God" refers primarily to the enduring covenants and purposes of God, rather than solely to the physical text of scripture itself.

This distinction is crucial because the physical text has faced significant challenges over the centuries, being subjected to human transmission and translation errors. Copies of the scriptures have been produced by fallible scribes who, despite their best intentions, were not free from mistakes. These errors can lead to differing interpretations and variations, suggesting that one must approach the text with a measure of scholarly caution. The implications of this understanding invite a more nuanced view of biblical inerrancy—one that recognizes both the divine inspiration of scripture and the historical realities of its transmission.

The LDS Gospel Topics essay on Biblical inerrancy further elaborates on this complexity. It acknowledges that while the Bible is indeed divinely inspired, it has traversed the hands of imperfect scribes and translators, resulting in textual variants that exist throughout different manuscripts. This acknowledgment does not, however, diminish the Bible’s spiritual authority; rather, it enriches our comprehension of divine communication. The essay posits that the ongoing revelation through prophets and personal spiritual experiences should also be considered part of the continuum of God’s word.

In this light, the faith community is encouraged to engage with scripture not just as a static document but as a living testament to God’s ongoing relationship with humanity. This perspective allows for a greater understanding of how divine truths manifest and evolve over time, inviting believers to seek wisdom amid the complexities of religious texts and their interpretations. The embrace of both ancient and modern revelations allows for a richer dialogue about faith, authority, and the nature of divine guidance in our contemporary world.

Addressing the First Vision Accounts: Consistency Amid Variants

Life After Ministries' claim of "11 different First Vision accounts" is factually incorrect. In reality, there are four primary accounts⁶ recorded between 1832 and 1842, which reflect Joseph Smith’s growing understanding of his experience. Each account serves as a different lens through which we can examine the various aspects of the First Vision, illustrating how his perception of this pivotal moment evolved over time.

The variations in detail are consistent with how personal narratives can change and adapt when retold for different audiences or purposes. This is a phenomenon well-supported by memory studies in psychology, which demonstrate that human recollection is influenced by context, audience, and individual growth. As people recount their experiences, especially significant ones like the First Vision, their narratives can shift to highlight different themes or details that resonate more closely with their current circumstances or beliefs.

Critics who dismiss the First Vision’s integrity due to these variants should also take a closer look at the textual inconsistencies found in Paul’s conversion accounts as described in the Book of Acts (Acts 9:3–7; Acts 22:6–11; Acts 26:13–18). These accounts, much like Smith's reports, differ in specific details yet maintain a consistent essence, focusing on Paul’s profound encounter with Christ and the transformative call to ministry that follows. Understanding these discrepancies in both cases invites a broader discourse on how religious experiences and narratives can be interpreted and understood within their historical and cultural contexts.

In examining both Joseph Smith's First Vision and Paul’s conversion, one finds a rich tapestry of spiritual experiences that reflect deeper truths, regardless of the differences in chronology or detail. This approach encourages a more nuanced consideration of faith narratives, ultimately fostering a better understanding of how divine encounters shape religious belief and personal identity across different eras and individuals.

Textual Variants in the Bible: A Testament of Human Transmission

The Bible’s transmission history illustrates its enduring significance despite textual challenges. The Dead Sea Scrolls, Septuagint (LXX), and Ugaritic texts demonstrate textual variations that enrich our understanding of biblical manuscripts. These early texts not only reveal the diverse interpretations of scripture but also highlight the historical and cultural contexts in which they were produced. For instance, the Dead Sea Scrolls provide invaluable insights into the beliefs and practices of the Jewish sect that curated them, while the Septuagint offers a glimpse into how ancient Jews in the Hellenistic world understood their sacred texts. Furthermore, the Ugaritic texts contribute to our comprehension of linguistic nuances and literary forms prevalent during the time the biblical narratives were being composed. Examples include:

• The long ending of Mark (Mark 16:9–20) and the woman caught in adultery (John 7:53–8:11), which are later additions not found in earlier manuscripts, have been a topic of significant debate among biblical scholars and historians. These passages, often regarded as controversial, exemplify the complexities of textual transmission and the challenges in determining the authenticity of scripture as they were likely included to convey moral teachings or amplify narratives within the biblical text.
• Questions surrounding the authorship and inclusion of books like Hebrews, Jude, and Revelation highlight the complexities of canon formation, raising important discussions about theological implications, historical context, and the criteria that early church leaders utilized in determining which texts were deemed authoritative and worthy of inclusion within the biblical canon.
• Deuteronomy 32:8-9 is shown to have been redacted from Sons of God to Children of Israel. This alteration does not fit within the scope of the Table of Nations, given where Israel was not yet a nation at that time. Additionally, the LXX (Septuagint) and the Dead Sea Scrolls illustrate how the original text may have been rendered to reflect more of a pantheon and hierarchal aspect of the Ancient Hebraic view of the Divine Council. This insight comes from the significant scholarly discoveries of both the Ugaritic Texts and the Dead Sea Scrolls, which provide fascinating context to the understanding of the text and its implications on the perception of divinity and society in ancient times.

These textual issues underscore the necessity of ongoing scholarly inquiry, revealing how deeply intertwined our understanding of scripture is with the historical contexts in which it was written. The recognition that scripture was shaped by historical contexts and human hands highlights the importance of examining the cultural, social, and political influences that have impacted its formation over time.

By delving into these complexities, scholars can more accurately interpret the various nuances and meanings embedded within the texts, ultimately enriching our understanding of their significance in both ancient and contemporary settings. The dynamic interplay between faith and history necessitates a rigorous, critical approach to scripture, encouraging us to seek deeper insights that honor both the sacred nature of these writings and the realities of the human experience that shaped them.

The Documentary Hypothesis and Deuteronomic Reform

The Documentary Hypothesis⁷ posits that the Pentateuch is a compilation of various sources (e.g., J, E, P, D) woven together over centuries, reflecting diverse theological perspectives and historical contexts. This theory not only provides insights into the literary structure of these foundational texts but also aligns with historical evidence of Deuteronomic reform^{8 9}under King Josiah (2 Kings 22–23)¹⁰, which centralized worship in Jerusalem¹¹¹² and emphasized covenant renewal.

The reforms initiated by Josiah were pivotal in shaping the religious landscape of ancient Israel, aiming to consolidate the practice of worship and eliminate polytheistic influences that had infiltrated the community. These developments suggest that scripture has been redacted and adapted over time to reflect evolving theological emphases, responding to the socio-political realities faced by the people of Israel, while also reinforcing the notion of a singular, unified worship of Yahweh as integral to their identity and survival.

Examples of the documentary hypothesis are given:

• Genesis 1:1-2:4 appears to come from the priestly source (P), characterized by its structured narrative and formal style, while the second account of Genesis 2:5-24, with its more anthropomorphic descriptions of God, originates from the Jahwist source (J), reflecting a different theological perspective that emphasizes the relational aspects of creation.
• Noahic Flood story appears redacted in Genesis 6. The Coptic version of Enoch provides insight into the reason the world was to be destroyed by the flood. This pseudepigraphic work gives narrative to Angels coming down and cohabitating with women and creating the Nephilim. Teaching humanity agriculture, metallurgy to fashion weapons of war and other hidden knowledge and understandings. This caused humanity to become wicked and morally corrupt, leading to increased violence and a separation from divine expectations. Additionally, the Biblical Flood story mirrors the much older flood story found in Ancient Sumerian and Mesopotamia, suggesting a common ancient narrative that carries profound implications on the understanding of divine judgment and redemption across cultures.
• Probably the biggest issue is how the Deuteronomic reform redaction of messianic prophecies of Christ and the promised hope of redemption for Israel has been interpreted through various theological lenses, leading to different understandings and implications for both historical and contemporary faith practices.

Textual Variants in English Bible Translations

The history of English Bible translations reveals how theological biases influenced textual decisions. For example, the choice of certain words and phrases often reflected the translators' personal beliefs and the religious context of their time, shaping not only the meaning but also the interpretation of key doctrines.

These translations were not merely attempts to render Scripture into a new language; they were also profoundly intertwined with the political and ecclesiastical struggles of their eras, such as the Reformation and the subsequent rise of various denominations. As a result, some translations emphasized doctrines like justification by faith, while others might have leaned towards a more sacramental view.

This intricate relationship between theology and translation highlights how each version of the Bible serves not just as a religious text, but also as a historical document showcasing the evolution of beliefs throughout the centuries.

• The King James Version, widely regarded and historically significant, reflects Protestant doctrinal priorities, emphasizing the theological tenets important to its time and shaping the beliefs of countless followers throughout the centuries.
• Modern translations like the NIV or ESV differ in rendering key passages, such as Romans 8:1, where manuscript variations affect theological interpretation, showcasing the significant impact these differences can have on readers' understanding of grace, condemnation, and assurance in the Christian faith.

These discrepancies highlight the need for careful study and reliance on the Spirit for discernment (James 1:5), emphasizing that in our pursuit of truth and understanding, we must not only engage with the text at surface level but also delve deeper into its meanings and implications. By doing so, we open ourselves to the guidance offered by the Spirit, fostering a relationship that allows for greater clarity and wisdom. This process requires patience and diligence, as we confront complex interpretations and varying perspectives, all while seeking to align our understanding with divine wisdom.

Conclusion: Faith, Revelation, and the Bible’s Role

It is not about denying the Bible’s divinity, but about recognizing that it reflects both divine inspiration and human influence. As Latter-day Saints, we affirm the Bible’s sacredness while embracing additional scripture (e.g., the Book of Mormon) and modern revelation as part of God’s unfolding work. This understanding nurtures a deeper appreciation for the text, as it holds both the pure essence of divine communication and elements shaped by the historical and cultural context of its authors. Such a perspective is not a dismissal of scripture but an affirmation of its central role in guiding faith and understanding throughout the ages.

Rather than relying on proof-texting or fragmented arguments, believers should approach scripture holistically, letting the narratives interweave and inform one another. This method encourages a personal and communal exploration of faith. By seeking the Spirit’s guidance in our study of scripture, we can uncover eternal truths that transcend mere textual analysis. Each verse is a part of a grander tapestry woven through time, and understanding it in relation to other writings enriches our grasp of its messages.

In doing so, we honor the Bible’s sacred purpose and the ongoing work of God in revealing His will to His children. Such an engagement fosters a living dialogue with God, where scripture is not merely a book of laws or historical accounts but a vibrant source of wisdom and inspiration for daily living. Believers are encouraged to reflect deeply on the teachings, seeking a personal connection that invites divine insight and understanding, thereby allowing the scriptures to transform their lives in significant ways. This perspective not only strengthens individual faith but also builds a more robust community of believers committed to following God’s will collectively.

I welcome anyone from Life After Ministry, who claim to be leading people to the Real Jesus, to engage in a thoughtful dialogue about their perspectives and motivations. I am particularly interested in understanding how they justify and rationalize their criticism—what foundational beliefs or experiences inform their stance? Furthermore, I wonder if they are truly willing to admit when they may have erred in their statements or views and correct any misinformation that may arise from those errors.

It is also essential to evaluate their readiness to apologize for engaging in deceptive tactics, where they may inadvertently be bearing false witness against others. Ultimately, the pursuit of truth should be rooted in integrity, and I encourage a culture where transparency prevails, allowing for open discussions about doubts and faith crises that can arise from manipulated information. Through this, we can foster a more compassionate environment where everyone seeks the Real Jesus in earnest sincerity and love.

ENDNOTES

1. Richard G. Scott, “Using the Supernal Gift of Prayer,” Liahona, May 2007, 10. ↩︎
2. David A. Bednar, “Teach Them to Understand” (Ricks College campus education week devotional, June 4, 1998) ↩︎
3. John Gill's Exposition of the Bible - Luke 24:32.  ↩︎
4. Clarke's Commentary: And they said one to another, Did not our heart burn within us, while he talked with us by the way, and while he opened to us the scriptures?
   
   Did not our heart burn within us - His word was in our heart as a burning fire, Jeremiah 20:9. Our hearts waxed hot within us, and while we were musing the fire burned, Psalm 39:3. In some such way as this the words of the disciples may be understood: but there is a very remarkable reading here in the Codex Bezae; instead of καιομενη, burned, it has κεκαλυμμενη, veiled; and one of the Itala has, fuit excaecatum, was blinded. Was not our heart veiled (blinded) when he conversed with us on the way, and while he unfolded the Scriptures to us, seeing we did not know him? Luke 24:3 ↩︎
5. Dallin H. Oaks, “In His Own Time, In His Own Way,” Liahona, Aug. 2013, 28. ↩︎
6. Gospel Topics Essays: First vision Accounts; see also The Joseph Smith Papers: Accounts of Joseph Smith's First Vision. Faithful Answers, Informed Responses (FAIR) also address the nuances of multiple accounts of the First Vision. ↩︎
7. Townsend, Colby J. (2014) "The Case for the Documentary Hypothesis, Historical Criticism, and the Latter-day Saints," Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship: Vol. 9, Article 4. ↩︎
8. Weinfeld, M. (1996) "Deuteronomy's Theological Revolution" Biblical Archaeology Society Library ↩︎
9. Christensen, Kevin (2003) "Nephi, Wisdom, and the Deuteronomist Reform," Insights: The Newsletter of the Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship: Vol. 23: No. 2, Article 3 ↩︎
10. Neal Rappleye, "The Deuteronomist Reforms and Lehi’s Family Dynamics: A Social Context for the Rebellions of Laman and Lemuel." Interpreter: A Journal of Mormon Scripture 16 (2015): 87-99 ↩︎
11. Miano, D. "The Deuteronomic History | My Jewish Learning"  ↩︎
12. Cogan, M. (2024). Deuteronomy Revamps King Hezekiah’s Failed Reform. TheTorah.com. See also: Cogan, M. (2023). Deuteronomy’s Wilderness Account: Ancient Revisionist History. TheTorah.com.  ↩︎

Questioning Andrew Soncrant's Pedestrian Explanation of the First Article of Faith

 

 Andrew Soncrant is part of the Reformed Baptist Church Plant, Apologia Church of Utah. This Church and ministry appear to be engaged in toxic apologetics where they manipulate and use deceptive strategies to discredit the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. This particular ministry appears to have an active YouTube channel where videos are posted of conversations, interactions, and brief "challenges" against the LDS Christian Faith. The following is my comment that has gone unresponsive to the apparent and blatant false claims made regarding the first article of faith.  

1) Claim made: LDS article of Faith number one says "We believe in God, the Eternal Father, and in His Son, Jesus Christ, and in the Holy Ghost". Sounds good right? But the truth is that the LDS organization teaches their people to speak "christianese". They say the same words, but they have totally different meanings.

Response to Claim: The idea and belief that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints teaches members to speak "Christianese" is a belief among the more recent evangelical apologists. This is a misnomer by the person speaking.

The first article of faith establishes scriptural truth that we accept and believe in who God the Father, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Spirit are. This is articulated in our understanding that they make up the Godhead - united in purpose and will regarding the plan of salvation. There is no "Christianese" or "mormonese" - except in an irrational and manipulative mindset and belief. 

2) Claim made: "What we should first understand is that when they say God the Eternal Father, they don't mean that he has existed from Everlasting into Everlasting - like it says in Psalm 90."

Response to Claim: Psalm 90 is called the Prayer of Moses and the term Lord in Hebrew is Yahweh. The transliteration of this verse is that Moses is praying to Yahweh - who is Elohim (which has various meanings, one of them referring to royalty or plurality). Yahweh is Jesus Christ. So, what we should first understand is this: we need to properly interpret scripture from an Exegesis standpoint and not an Eisegesis Standpoint. It is Christ who is from everlasting to everlasting. This is what we accept and believe regarding the son. It is also what we accept and believe concerning the father. The term in Psalm 90 "everlasting to everlasting" in Hebrew is olam and means "long duration, antiquity, futurity" and also means something that is perpetual. To this, Latter-day Saints agree. Yahweh - Christ is perpetual, his existence is also of a long duration. 

Also, Psalm 90 coincides with authoritative Jewish understanding of the eternal and pre-existence of things prior to creation. This includes Torah, Repentance, Israel, and God's throne and glory (Bereshit Rabbah 1): 

"In the beginning of God's creating..." - Six things preceded the creation of the world; some of them were created and some of them were decided to be created. The Torah and the Throne of Glory were created. How do we know the Torah was? As it says (Proverbs 8:22): "God made me at the beginning of his way." How do we know the Throne of Glory was? As it says (Psalms 93:2): "Your throne is established as of old etc." The Patriarchs, Israel, the Temple, and the name of the Messiah were decided to be created. How do we know the Patriarchs were? As it says (Hosea 9:10): "Like grapes in the wilderness etc." How do we know Israel was? As it says (Psalms 74:2): "Remember your congregation, whom you purchased from old." How do we know the Temple was? As it says (Jeremiah 17:12): "Your throne of glory, on high from the beginning etc." How do we know the name of the Messiah was? As it says (Psalms 72:17): "May his name exist forever etc. [his name shall be Yinnon as long as the sun]." Rabbi Ahavah said in the name of Rabbi Ze'ira: Even repentance was, as it says (Psalms 90:2): "Before the mountains were birthed," and at the same time (Psalms 90:3), "You turned man to contrition etc." However, I do not know which was first--if the Torah preceded the Throne of Glory or the Throne of Glory preceded the Torah. Rabbi Abba Bar Cahana said: The Torah preceded the Throne of Glory, as it says (Proverbs 8:22): "God made me at the beginning of his way, the first of his works of old." This is before that of which it is written (Psalms 93:2): "Your throne is established as of old." 

So, if you are going to call attention to the fact that we need to understand Psalm 90 - we need to understand it in proper context - not an eisegesis and flippant pedestrian way to disprove the first article of faith. 

3) Claim made: "no, they believe that he was once a man like you, and I are. Someone who sinned, right, but then was obedient to the gospel ordinances and principles that was exalted into Godhood." 

Response to claim: This statement is mere speculation and manipulation of what statements were made. Much of this comes from the couplet of Lorenzo Snow - "As man is, God once was, as God is, man may become". There is not much information concerning the details of God's mortal existence. The reality is - and the point that needs to be made - is that it does not matter. God is our Heavenly Father who sent His son to redeem us so that we are able to be (as the Apostle Paul said) Heirs and Joint heirs with Christ. (See this response)

4) Claim made: "When they say Jesus, they don't mean the eternal God who took on flesh and died on the cross for our sins. Instead, they mean the offspring of Heavenly Father and one of his goddess wives and the brother of lucifer." 

Response: Again, a statement that is not only a strawman fallacy, but also mere speculative and irrational. Latter-day Saints actually do believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of the Living God who did come down and live a mortal life, suffered, died on the cross, was buried, and then rose the third day with a resurrected body of flesh and bone. 

Also, what the individual is teaching here is something that is known as modalism. This doctrine specifically teaches that the persons of the Trinity are merely represented by three modes or aspects of the Divine Being. It denies any distinct or coexisting persons in the divine nature of the Godhead. 

Concerning Christ as being the spirit brother of Lucifer - well.... hmmm let us see.... Scripture refers to Christ as the Morning Star. Scripture also refers to Lucifer as the Morning Star. Scripture calls Christ as a Lion. Scripture also says that Satan is also a Lion. Do we then conclude that Christ is Satan? No, we do not ever dare say such a thing because we understand that these symbolisms are referring to a contrast of two different aspects of the same symbolism. Christ is the morning star as he is the First of all things. Satan is the morning star in that he is a fallen being. Christ is the Lion of Judah whereas Satan is a lion roaring and devouring. 

The fact of the matter is this: the speaker is settling his teaching on a well-known Sabellianism unorthodox teaching as a means to challenge and refute the LDS First Article of Faith. 

5) Claim made: "They also deny the fact that the Holy Ghost is eternally God". 

Response to the Claim: Again, this is mere speculation and faulty assumption devised as a means to deceive and mislead people. Here is a great article regarding the Holy Spirit: 

6) Claim made: "This is a big issue if you do not have Jesus Christ, the Eternal God, is your sacrifice for your sins - you don't have an atonement that actually has any effect on you. That's why the organization says you need to make up those works yourself. You need to do x, y, and z in order to reach a level of exaltation in Godhood. It's not biblical. We must reject it. We must see the Christians for what it is and correct it for the truth." 

Response to the claim: This is a very vague and ambiguous conclusion. What works are you referring to where the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints teach that they need to replace the atonement with? Maybe provide some clarification here. As it is, sounds like you are attempting to shoot blindfolded from the hip without ever hitting the target. Again, deceptive, manipulative, and misleading statements. 

As for the latter statement - yes, we need to correct what someone says and teachings for the sake of Truth. This means correcting your statements and showing how they are in error and the danger you are in for promoting and teaching such things. Are you willing to correct your statements? Are you willing to repent of your deception and manipulation of the teachings of the LDS Faith? Or are you merely another arrogant ignoramus blowhard illiterate scriptorian with pedestrian and flinstonian views that want to garner a following of blind faithful disciples?

Questioning Andrew Soncrant's Pedestrian Explanation of the First Article of Faith

Andrew Soncrants recently offered a critique of the LDS First Article of Faith, focusing on his interpretation of the Godhead and its supposed contradictions with biblical teachings. His argument suggests that Joseph Smith's revelations in the Book of Mormon conflict with traditional Christian views of God's eternal nature. This raises critical questions about LDS theology and how it compares to mainstream Christian doctrines, such as the Trinity. Addressing these misunderstandings is essential—not just to clarify LDS beliefs, but to ensure that God's character, as understood in the Restored Gospel, is properly represented. This discussion will unpack the errors in Soncrants' claims, relying on scripture and sound reasoning to set the record straight.

Understanding the LDS First Article of Faith

The First Article of Faith in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints makes a bold and clear declaration: “We believe in God, the Eternal Father, and in His Son, Jesus Christ, and in the Holy Ghost.” This foundational statement sets the tone for understanding who God is in LDS theology. It also offers a distinctive contrast to traditional Christian beliefs about the nature of God, particularly as seen in concepts like the Trinity.

A Declaration of Belief in the Godhead

In LDS theology, the Godhead consists of three distinct beings: God the Father, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Ghost. Unlike the concept of the Trinity in traditional Christianity, where God is regarded as one essence in three persons, the LDS understanding emphasizes their individuality and separate natures, while maintaining their unity in purpose.

• God, the Eternal Father: He is the literal Heavenly Father, a glorified and perfected being with a tangible body of flesh and bone. As the Creator of humanity, He is the central being of worship.
• Jesus Christ: He is God's Only Begotten Son in the flesh, the Savior and Redeemer of the world. He shares the Father's divine mission and acts as an intercessor for humanity.
• The Holy Ghost: A personage of spirit with no physical body, the Holy Ghost’s role is to testify of truth, guide individuals to Christ, and provide comfort and inspiration.

What unites these distinct beings? Their oneness in purpose, not substance. Their mission is singular: to bring about the immortality and eternal life of God’s children. Each contributes uniquely but harmoniously to the eternal plan of salvation, offering a cooperative model of divinity that is relational, accessible, and deeply personal to believers.

The LDS perspective on the Godhead is grounded in scriptural accounts like the baptism of Jesus (Matthew 3:16-17), where the Father speaks from heaven, the Son is baptized, and the Holy Ghost descends like a dove. These scriptures highlight the distinct roles of each member of the Godhead.

Comparison with Traditional Trinity Doctrine

A major point of critique from people like Andrew Soncrants lies in the difference between the LDS Godhead and the traditional Christian Trinity. While the Trinity teaches that Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are co-equal and co-eternal persons of one indivisible substance, the LDS doctrine maintains a clear distinction between these beings. Here’s a simple breakdown of the differences:

• Nature of God: LDS theology teaches that the Father and the Son have physical bodies (see Doctrine and Covenants 130:22), while the Holy Ghost is a spirit. Traditional Christianity asserts that God exists as a single, immaterial essence.
• Oneness: For Latter-day Saints, the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost are "one" in purpose. Traditional Trinity doctrine teaches that they are one in being, often described as a mystery beyond human comprehension.
• Human connection: The LDS belief holds that men and women are literal spirit children of God with the potential to become like Him (Romans 8:17; Doctrine and Covenants 93:29), while traditional Christianity typically emphasizes God’s complete transcendence.

Latter-day Saints find their understanding of the Godhead supported in events like Joseph Smith’s First Vision, where he saw God the Father and Jesus Christ as two distinct individuals. This powerful, personal revelation set a theological framework that redefined Christian doctrine for believers in the Restoration.

Furthermore, LDS theology looks to biblical texts (like John 17:20-22), where Jesus prays for His disciples to be “one” as He and the Father are one. This unity is not about fusing into a single being but working in perfect harmony.

For critics like Soncrants, the LDS emphasis on the individuality of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost may feel foreign or even heretical—but the LDS perspective seeks to restore a plain and direct understanding of divinity, as revealed in scripture and modern revelation. This approach allows believers to see God not as an abstract, unknowable force but as loving, approachable, and deeply involved in the salvation of all humankind.

Addressing Misrepresentation of LDS Theology

Misrepresentation often stems from misunderstanding or deliberate oversimplification. Critics of Latter-day Saint doctrine, like Andrew Soncrants, frequently frame LDS teachings as deceptive or incompatible with Christianity’s foundation. To address such concerns, we must lean on scripture, historical context, and rational discussion to clarify what the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints actually believes and teaches about God, the Godhead, and faith.

The 'Christianese' Fallacy

Some critics argue that Latter-day Saints co-opt “Christianese” — the common terminologies of Christian belief — to mask doctrinal differences. They claim LDS usage of terms like “Godhead” or “Eternal Father” is designed to sound mainstream while hiding significant theological deviations. But this argument fails to account for the scriptural basis and doctrinal clarity behind LDS teachings.

The LDS Church teaches about God using plain, meaningful language, grounded in scripture. For instance, the term "Godhead" reflects a biblical reality rather than an attempt to align superficially with Trinitarian Christians. Genesis 1:26 states, "Let us make man in our image," implying a collaborative plurality in the Godhead. Similarly, at the baptism of Jesus (Matthew 3:16-17), we see the Father speaking from heaven, the Son being baptized, and the Holy Ghost descending like a dove. The LDS interpretation directly respects these scriptural events without overcomplicating or abstracting their meaning.

Far from misleading, LDS teachings emphasize clarity and accessibility. Critics often cite Joseph Smith’s revelations as proof of deviation, but his goal was to restore truths from early Christianity, not invent new theology. By "restoration," the Church means returning to practices and beliefs found in scripture and the Savior’s ministry, not reinventing them.

What about accusations of twisting terms? Terms like salvation, atonement, and revelation may carry unique LDS nuances, but this doesn’t make them deceptive. Think of it like regional accents; the words are the same, but pronunciation or emphasis changes. The Church embraces a scripturally based understanding that may differ from traditional interpretations, but it is neither insincere nor designed to mislead.

Unity in the Godhead: The Biblical Context

At the heart of the LDS doctrine is the Godhead: God the Father, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Ghost. They are separate and distinct beings, united in purpose and glory. Critics such as Soncrants propose this idea of "unity in purpose" deviates too far from the traditional Christian Trinity. But does it, really?

Let’s examine Jesus’s words in John 17:21-22. He prayed that His disciples “may be one, even as we are one.” It’s clear that Christ was talking about unity in intention and effort, not merging into one essence. Similarly, the LDS concept of the Godhead respects each member’s individual personhood while honoring their complete harmony in will and purpose.

Scripturally, the notion of distinct roles is evident. Consider Acts 7:55-56—Stephen sees both God the Father and Jesus Christ standing at His right hand. If they were one indivisible substance, why not present as such? The LDS view aligns more literally with these accounts, making the relationships tangible and relatable for believers.

Here’s a helpful analogy: consider a family with a shared goal to create a nurturing home. Each member has unique roles but works in synchronization toward that common mission. The LDS version of the Godhead offers the same relatable dynamic—distinct, yet perfectly united.

For critics, the physicality of God is another sticking point. Doctrine and Covenants 130:22 explains that the Father and Son have tangible, glorified bodies, while the Holy Ghost is a being of spirit. This teaching resonates with the idea of a relational, personable God who can interact with His children. It may contrast with the Trinity’s immaterial essence, but it doesn’t compromise God's divinity or infinite power. It simply makes Him more approachable and comprehensible.

In the end, the LDS doctrine underscores a thoroughly biblical principle: individuality can enhance harmony. The Father, Son, and Holy Ghost are united in achieving God’s work of bringing "to pass the immortality and eternal life of man" (Moses 1:39). What better representation of divine love and cooperation could there be?

The Eternal Nature of God the Father

Understanding the eternal nature of our Heavenly Father is central to responding to criticisms and misconceptions about LDS theology. By grounding our beliefs in scripture and focusing on the unique revelations of the Restoration, we can see how the teachings of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints harmonize with God’s eternal essence while providing clarity on misunderstood doctrines.

Psalm 90 and God's Eternal Purpose

Psalm 90:2 declares, "Before the mountains were brought forth, or ever thou hadst formed the earth and the world, even from everlasting to everlasting, thou art God." This verse affirms God's timeless existence and majestic sovereignty. Critics, including Andrew Soncrants, argue that Latter-day Saint theology somehow denies or diminishes this eternal reality, but the truth couldn’t be more different.

In LDS theology, God is recognized as an eternal, unchanging being with a divine purpose. The phrase "from everlasting to everlasting" reflects God's infinite presence—not bound by time or space, but existing beyond the confines of creation. For Latter-day Saints, this scripture underscores the foundational belief that God the Father is the same yesterday, today, and forever (see Doctrine and Covenants 20:12). It emphasizes the eternal consistency of His character.

Some might point to the LDS concept of eternal progression or statements like Joseph Smith's King Follett Discourse to question God's constancy. However, these teachings do not conflict with Psalm 90. Instead, they enrich our understanding of God's nature, offering us a perspective that He operates within an eternal framework that is far beyond human comprehension. His purpose—bringing "to pass the immortality and eternal life of man" (Moses 1:39)—and His attributes are unchanging. Just as Psalm 90 contrasts mortal life’s brevity with God’s immortality, LDS teachings emphasize that humankind's opportunity for exaltation exists within God's timeless plan.

For believers, this concept is not abstract but deeply personal. How does God's eternal nature affect our lives? It provides a foundation of trust. Knowing that we worship a God who is constant, eternal, and deeply invested in His children allows us to face the uncertainties of mortality with faith and hope.

Clarifying the Concept of Exaltation

The doctrine of exaltation is one of the most misunderstood aspects of LDS theology. Critics like Soncrants often portray it as a fringe belief, suggesting that humans somehow "replace" God or diminish His eternal role. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Exaltation, as taught in the Restored Gospel, does not change or lessen God's eternal nature. It is a manifestation of His love. God’s eternal purpose is to guide His children toward a fullness of joy, which includes the opportunity to become like Him. This concept is grounded in biblical principles. Romans 8:17 teaches that we are "heirs of God, and joint heirs with Christ," while 1 John 3:2 declares, "Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him."

Does the possibility of human exaltation suggest that God becomes irrelevant? Not at all. God remains sovereign, omnipotent, and central to the eternal plan. Latter-day Saints do not believe in dethroning God or diminishing His divinity. Instead, exaltation reflects His infinite love and generosity. Consider it like a flame that ignites other flames; sharing His divine attributes does not reduce His light but increases it.

A key misunderstanding often arises from discussions of "eternal progression.” Some critics equate this teaching with the idea of the Father "progressing" in a way that implies imperfection. However, Latter-day Saints understand that eternal progression applies not to God’s divine nature but to His ongoing work in bringing to pass humanity's eternal exaltation. Exaltation is not about overthrowing God but participating in His eternal work and joy.

The doctrine of exaltation helps us grasp the familial nature of God's plan. He is literally our Father, and our progression reflects His desire for us to grow eternally. It’s not a competition but a collaboration, grounded in love. Far from being incompatible with God's eternal nature, exaltation reveals just how profound and unchanging His purpose is.

Mischaracterizations of Jesus Christ in LDS Belief

Andrew Soncrants' critiques of Latter-day Saint theology include challenging the portrayal of Jesus Christ and His role within the Godhead. These criticisms often reflect a lack of understanding or a deliberate misrepresentation of LDS doctrine. It’s vital to address these points, particularly how the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints views Jesus as the Savior and His pre-mortal role in God’s plan.

Jesus Christ: The Eternal Savior

Latter-day Saints firmly accept Jesus Christ as the Eternal Savior and the Only Begotten Son of God. This belief is foundational to the doctrine of the Church, shaping how members see themselves in relation to God and understand their eternal purpose. Jesus Christ is not merely a moral teacher or prophet; He is the divine Redeemer, chosen by the Father to atone for humanity's sins.

Critics often mischaracterize the LDS view of Christ, accusing the Church of presenting Him as subordinate to God the Father in a way that diminishes His divinity. However, this perspective oversimplifies LDS theology.

In LDS belief:

• Jesus is co-eternal with God the Father, meaning He existed with God before the foundation of the world (John 1:1–3).
• He is fully divine, possessing attributes of Godhood, yet distinct as a personage from the Father. This distinction reflects the same oneness in purpose that Jesus Himself emphasized in John 17.
• Jesus is the Only Begotten Son in the flesh, meaning His mortal life was uniquely initiated by a divine conception.

This clear distinction highlights a personal, relational Savior—one who advocates on behalf of humanity (1 Timothy 2:5). Unlike many interpretations of the Trinity, where Jesus and the Father are seen as one substance, LDS doctrine emphasizes their profound love and unity in carrying out God’s eternal plan of salvation.

Soncrants' remarks fail to grasp the harmonious relationship presented in the LDS view of the Godhead. Jesus Christ is neither an abstract deity nor a secondary figure but the central figure in Heavenly Father’s plan. His atonement in the Garden of Gethsemane and on the cross underscores Latter-day Saints’ belief in a deeply compassionate and approachable Savior.

Pre-Mortal Existence and the Savior's Role

A unique aspect of Latter-day Saint theology, often misunderstood, is the doctrine of pre-mortal existence. This teaching fundamentally shapes the LDS understanding of Jesus Christ’s divine role and mission.

Before coming to earth, all human beings, including Jesus, lived in a pre-mortal state as spirit children of God the Father (Jeremiah 1:5). Jesus, as the firstborn spirit, held a preeminent position: He was chosen in the grand council in heaven to carry out the Father’s plan. His role as Savior was determined long before the creation of the world.

Here’s what this means:

• In LDS belief, Jesus Christ volunteered to be the Redeemer, offering Himself to fulfill the demands of justice and bring mercy to humankind.
• His decision contrasts with Lucifer, who sought to coerce humanity and take God’s glory for himself.
• This choice established Christ’s role as the embodiment of perfect love, selflessness, and obedience to the Father’s will.

When critics like Soncrants dismiss LDS teachings on pre-mortal existence, they fail to grasp the depth it adds to the Savior’s mission. The pre-mortal Jesus was a willing participant in Heavenly Father’s plan, not a detached or impersonal force. This doctrine illuminates why Jesus Christ was uniquely qualified to atone for our sins. He knew the Father’s will intimately, having existed alongside Him for eternity.

This teaching also answers a profound question: Why was Jesus Christ chosen? While all spirits are beloved children of God, Jesus was the only one capable of carrying out the infinite atonement. As the Only Begotten Son, He had the divine attributes necessary to bridge the gap between mortal imperfection and God’s perfect justice.

For Latter-day Saints, understanding Jesus’ pre-mortal role enriches their relationship with Him. He isn’t just a historical figure or a symbol; He’s a brother, a Redeemer who has loved humanity from the very beginning. This deeply personalized view stands in contrast to critics’ accusations of detachment or inconsistency in LDS Christology.

To dismiss or distort these teachings, as Soncrants has done, is to misrepresent the love and hope central to the gospel of Jesus Christ. By understanding His divine mission—both in pre-mortality and in mortality—it becomes clear that the LDS portrayal of Christ is consistent with biblical accounts and offers profound spiritual insights.

The Holy Ghost in LDS Theology

The Holy Ghost holds a unique and sacred role in the theology of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS). As the third member of the Godhead, He is central to God’s plan for humanity, yet distinct in His divine mission. His presence offers a deeply personal connection between individuals and the divine, testifying of truth and guiding believers to Jesus Christ. However, the Holy Ghost’s divine identity is often misunderstood or misrepresented by critics. Addressing these misconceptions is essential to understanding LDS teachings.

The Holy Ghost as a Member of the Godhead

In LDS theology, the Holy Ghost is a distinct personage of spirit and a fully divine being. Unlike God the Father and Jesus Christ, who have glorified physical bodies, the Holy Ghost exists as a spirit, enabling Him to fulfill His crucial role as a constant companion, teacher, and witness of truth. He serves as a direct link between God and His children, guiding them toward salvation.

The unique responsibilities of the Holy Ghost include:

• Testifying of the Father and the Son: The Holy Ghost confirms the reality of God the Father and Jesus Christ to believers (John 15:26).
• Revealing truth: He enables individuals to discern spiritual truths, illuminating the scriptures and providing personal revelation (Moroni 10:5).
• Sanctifying: The Holy Ghost cleanses and refines individuals as they repent and turn to Christ, preparing them for eternal life.
• Comforting: As the “Comforter” (John 14:26), the Holy Ghost provides solace and strength during trials.

This sacred role is amplified in the LDS doctrine of the Gift of the Holy Ghost, a blessing that allows baptized members to receive His constant companionship, contingent upon their worthiness. Through this gift, believers gain a more profound guidance in their daily lives, something described as “the still small voice” (1 Kings 19:12).

The Holy Ghost is not independent or detached from the rest of the Godhead. Instead, He works in perfect unity with the Father and the Son to fulfill God’s eternal purpose: “to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man” (Moses 1:39). His role is indispensable in helping individuals navigate the path of salvation and align their lives with divine principles.

Refuting Claims of Diminished Divinity

Critics sometimes assert that the LDS depiction of the Holy Ghost diminishes His divine status, suggesting that His lack of a physical body or different role implies subordination or limitations within the Godhead. This perspective misinterprets LDS doctrine and fails to account for scriptural evidence.

Far from being lesser in divinity, LDS teachings affirm that the Holy Ghost is co-equal with God the Father and Jesus Christ in power, knowledge, and purpose. His spiritual nature does not detract from His godhood; rather, it equips Him to fulfill specific aspects of the divine plan that require His unique attributes. For example, His ability to dwell within and testify to all people simultaneously is a manifestation of perfect omnipresence achieved through His spirit form. In John 16:7-13, Jesus emphasizes the necessity of the Holy Ghost’s role, referring to Him as the “Spirit of truth” who will guide believers into all truth.

It’s also worth noting the LDS belief that the members of the Godhead voluntarily assume their roles within God’s plan. The Holy Ghost’s work is deeply complimentary to that of the Father and the Son, not inferior. Just as Jesus Christ is the Savior and Mediator while the Father oversees the plan of salvation, the Holy Ghost’s role as a witness and sanctifier is uniquely his. These roles do not imply difference in divine worth but reflect the harmonious division of responsibilities within the Godhead.

Additionally, LDS scripture confirms that the Holy Ghost possesses attributes characteristic of divinity:

• Omniscience: He knows the thoughts and intents of the heart, as seen in Alma 37:6.
• Omnipresence: His spiritual nature allows Him to reach all of God’s children simultaneously.
• Eternality: The Holy Ghost, like the Father and the Son, is eternal, without beginning or end.

Critics like Andrew Soncrants may argue that the individuality of the Godhead undermines their unity and equality. However, LDS theology highlights that unity doesn’t require sameness. Just as a symphony achieves harmony with distinct instruments contributing their unique sounds, the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost maintain their individuality while working in perfect concert to accomplish God’s will.

To say the Holy Ghost lacks divinity is to disregard His role in scripture, His attributes, and His power. As part of the Godhead, He exemplifies divine love and cooperation, tirelessly guiding and uplifting God’s children on their journey back to Him. For Latter-day Saints, learning to recognize and respond to the Holy Ghost is a sacred part of developing faith and drawing nearer to God.

Grace, Works, and the Path to Exaltation

The profound relationship between grace, works, and humanity’s eternal potential stands at the center of Latter-day Saint theology. For those of us who seek to reconcile faith and obedience in our daily lives, understanding this dynamic is crucial. Exaltation, or eternal life in God’s presence, depends on both the grace of Jesus Christ and our willingness to live His teachings. Let’s explore how these principles function together in the gospel of Jesus Christ.

Faith, Obedience, and Christ’s Atonement

Faith in Jesus Christ is the foundation for both salvation and exaltation. Through His atoning sacrifice, Christ made it possible for everyone to overcome sin and death. But here’s the key: faith isn’t passive. It propels us to action. If grace is the seed, works are the nurturing hands that cultivate it to grow into eternal blessings.

Many critics mistake the Latter-day Saint perspective on grace as placing undue emphasis on works. This isn’t true. We believe salvation begins with Christ. His grace is the enabling power that allows us to overcome our shortcomings. But salvation, particularly exaltation, requires that we also act. In James 2:17, we’re reminded that “faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.” This does not diminish grace; it magnifies it.

Obedience to the commandments is how we show our love for God. As Christ taught in John 14:15, "If ye love me, keep my commandments." These aren’t arbitrary rules but the divine pathway to transform us. It’s like learning to play a musical instrument. Grace is the instructor that makes it possible, but practice—the “work”—is what enables us to become proficient. Together, grace and effort lead to spiritual harmony.

Critics often argue that salvation should be freely given. And it is! Everyone will receive resurrection through Christ’s grace. But exaltation—becoming like God and enjoying eternal family relationships—requires us to do more. This is not because God demands payment but because becoming like Him requires us to stretch and grow spiritually. Without obedience, we can’t become the kind of beings capable of living in His presence.

Biblical Foundations for Obedience and Discipleship

Scripture is filled with clear teachings that obedience is an inseparable companion to faith. Throughout the Bible, we see examples of individuals who showed their devotion to God through their actions. Let’s explore some of these together:

1. The Parable of the Wise and Foolish Builders (Matthew 7:24-27)
   Jesus Himself explained that hearing His words isn’t enough. He said, “Whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock.” Obedience anchors us to Christ, the unshakable foundation.

2. Abraham’s Willingness to Sacrifice Isaac (Genesis 22)
   Abraham didn’t just believe God’s promises; he acted on them. His willingness to obey God, even in an almost unimaginable trial, demonstrated his faith. Through this obedience, we see a model of trust and discipleship.

3. Jesus and the Rich Young Ruler (Mark 10:17-22)
   The Savior Himself taught the importance of obedience when He invited the rich young man to sell all he had, give to the poor, and follow Him. The young man believed in Christ but struggled to act, showcasing the difference between passive belief and active discipleship.

Obedience isn’t about earning salvation; it’s about aligning our actions with God’s will. Christ didn’t just teach us to believe in Him; He taught us to become like Him. The Great Commission (Matthew 28:19-20) reminds us to teach others to observe all that Christ has commanded. This isn’t just doctrinal—it’s deeply personal. Obedience refines our hearts and builds trust in God’s plan.

Finally, 1 John 2:3-6 lays it out plainly: “And hereby we do know that we know him, if we keep his commandments. He that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him.” Obedience has never been a checklist; it’s a reflection of our faith and love.

As we walk this path of faith and discipleship, we need both grace and works to guide us toward exaltation. Think about it like climbing a mountain. Grace is the safety rope that protects us and provides a way, but we’ve got to make the climb. Together, this partnership with God allows us to become more than we ever could on our own. God’s plan isn’t just about saving us—it’s about preparing us to stand in His presence and continue to grow for eternity.

The Need for Respectful Dialogue in Religious Discourse

In religious discussions, emotions often run high. Faith is personal, deeply tied to identity, and discussions about it can feel like navigating a minefield. But meaningful dialogue isn't about proving who's right—it's about understanding, learning, and connecting. For members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, respectful engagement is not just courteous; it's foundational to defending the Restored Gospel and promoting Christlike love.

Avoiding Toxic Apologetics

Religious debates often fall into the trap of toxic apologetics, where the goal shifts from understanding to "winning" at any cost. This leads to strawman arguments and misrepresentations instead of meaningful discussion. When critics like Andrew Soncrants misrepresent LDS beliefs, such as the nature of the Godhead, it twists the conversation into something counterproductive.

What’s a strawman argument? Picture a scarecrow—it doesn’t represent a real person, just an imitation. Critics build these “scarecrows” of LDS theology by distorting teachings to make them easier to tear down. For example:

• Claiming Latter-day Saints worship “a different God” because they reject the Trinity’s philosophical underpinnings.
• Accusing LDS teachings of polytheism when the belief clearly defines a unified Godhead with distinct roles.

This approach fuels division, not understanding. It’s like arguing with a caricature instead of the real person standing in front of you. We’ve all seen or engaged in debates where emotions rule and genuine understanding takes a backseat. But toxic tactics only polarize and confirm stereotypes.

The antidote? Accuracy and fairness. Quoting scripture directly, like Matthew 3:16-17, which shows the distinction between the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, shifts the focus back to truth. Every faithful discussion must begin here: letting scriptures and doctrines speak for themselves without distortion. Misrepresentation isn’t harmless banter—it builds walls that prevent real conversations.

A Call for Constructive Engagement

What if we approached theological differences like learning a new language instead of preparing for a courtroom debate? Constructive engagement invites open dialogue where mutual respect and a shared desire to understand take precedence over defensiveness. LDS theology thrives in settings where beliefs can be openly explained without contention.

Is it possible to discuss heated topics and still remain respectful? Absolutely. It’s about creating space for curiosity and humility. Here are three steps I value when engaging in discussions about faith:

1. Ask questions, don’t just argue.
   Instead of assuming someone misunderstands LDS beliefs intentionally, ask what they’ve learned and where their knowledge comes from. Questions like, “What do you think LDS doctrine teaches about God?” open doors to clarification.

2. Separate belief from intent.
   Even if someone disagrees, their goal may not be to ridicule or attack. Assuming goodwill encourages a more inclusive tone. Remember, Christ taught, “Love your enemies” (Matthew 5:44), so surely, we can respect those who merely disagree.

3. Look for common ground.
   Whether it’s shared admiration for Christ’s sacrifice or agreement on the need for devotion, find a foundation for connection. This humanizes the dialogue and reminds both parties of shared spiritual goals.

For example, when discussing the Godhead versus the Trinity with mainstream Christians, I’ve found it useful to focus on the shared belief in Christ’s divinity. From there, I can explain why LDS doctrine emphasizes their distinct roles. It’s not about “us versus them” but about clarifying how LDS teachings enrich this understanding.

Ultimately, the most Christlike discussions are those committed to both truth and love. In John 13:34-35, Christ said, “By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another.” Respectful dialogue isn’t just practical—it’s evidence of discipleship. If we lose sight of love in defending our faith, we miss the true purpose of the gospel.

Faith discussions don’t require everyone to leave agreeing—but they should leave understanding. Clear, respectful dialogue plants seed of insight, even when immediate agreement isn’t achieved. That’s the goal worth pursuing.

Conclusion

The First Article of Faith is far more than a doctrinal statement; it’s a declaration of understanding about God’s nature. Misinterpretations often reduce its profound meaning into oversimplified arguments, as seen in Andrew Soncrants' critique. However, addressing these misrepresentations provides an opportunity to clarify and strengthen shared faith in God, His Son Jesus Christ, and the Holy Ghost.

Rather than fostering division, discussions like this should focus on mutual respect and shared beliefs in Christ’s divine role, providing common ground for productive dialogue. The distinctions between the LDS understanding of the Godhead and traditional Christian dogmas like the Trinity serve not to divide believers but to deepen our collective quest to comprehend God’s eternal purpose.

By grounding explanations in scripture and speaking with love, we create opportunities for understanding while defending the truths of the Restored Gospel. Ultimately, our faith compels us to extend Christlike love when engaging with critics. God's plan is one of unity, purpose, and salvation—and that is the shared immovable truth that should guide our discussions.