The concept of personal revelation is not unique to the faith of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS). It is a foundational principle found throughout religious history, including within the Bible itself. Yet, critics of the LDS faith frequently dismiss or invalidate personal revelation or visions, often applying misinterpretations or double standards in their critique. One such example can be seen in a recent blog post by Life After Ministry titled “Visions and Revelation.” This post exemplifies their typical approach—using manipulative language and presenting a one-sided argument devoid of context or fairness.
In our look at the Church’s teachings on personal revelation, we’re wondering how someone can interpret if their revelations are correct through the lens of God’s word. This also serves as a good reminder of how the Lord has always kept His promise and speaks to us today just as He did in the beginning of time.
What a relief! What a relief it is for me and other ex-cultists knowing we have something to rely upon that isn’t filtered through someone else’s poor interpretation!
The Lord in His brilliant delivery used simple statements to ensure us His word will be the same for eternity. Thank You Lord! Our hearts grieve that Mormons have adopted the poor explanation of why they’ve rejected Jesus and His infallible word.
Ask the Mormon this: if someone said something bad about someone you loved, does their opinion make the statement true? If it doesn’t, then why would someone’s poor translation of the Bible mean the original writings can’t be trusted?
Ask who made the errors, where are the contradictions in the original writings, and when did this happen. Be specific.
Are you as a Mormon positive that Joseph Smith’s original writings are still intact? Are you aware there are at least 11 versions of Joe Smith’s first vision, and they contradict themselves?
From the outset, the blog post takes a dismissive tone. First, it cites Isaiah 40:8—"The grass withereth, the flower fadeth: but the word of our God shall stand forever"—without offering any meaningful commentary or exploration of its context. This selective use of scripture is presented as a blanket dismissal of the LDS understanding of revelation, assuming without justification that modern revelation cannot coexist with the enduring truth of God’s word. However, such an interpretation overlooks the broader biblical precedent for ongoing communication between God and His children, as seen in the experiences of prophets and apostles throughout scripture.
Second, the author attempts to undermine the LDS perspective by asserting that personal revelation or visions within the faith are based on faulty interpretation. Their argument assumes that members of the Church are either deceived or brainwashed, simply because their spiritual experiences do not align with the author’s particular reading of the Bible. This perspective not only begs the question but also imposes an interpretive framework that privileges one group’s understanding of scripture over all others, without addressing the legitimacy of alternate perspectives.
The blog post also shifts the discussion toward the concepts of biblical inerrancy and infallibility, common tenets among many evangelical Christians. The author’s position becomes evident in their conclusion: “Thank you, Lord! Our hearts grieve that Mormons have adopted the poor explanation of why they've rejected Jesus and His infallible word.” Such language reflects not only a misunderstanding of LDS theology but also a narrow view of what constitutes a valid relationship with Christ and His teachings.
In a further attempt to discredit LDS beliefs, the author poses a rhetorical question: “How acceptable is it for someone to say something bad about someone you loved? Does their opinion make the statement true? If it doesn’t, then why would someone’s poor translation of the Bible mean the original writings can’t be trusted?” While this question appears to challenge the LDS view of scripture, it is, in fact, a classic example of a logical fallacy. By presupposing the inerrancy of the Bible and the exclusivity of their interpretive lens, the author manipulates the reader into equating disagreement with deception. This approach leaves no room for honest dialogue or critical examination of the doctrine of biblical inerrancy itself.
Critics such as the author of this blog often fail to recognize the inherent double standard in their reasoning. The very question they pose to members of the LDS faith can just as easily be turned back on them: “If you are saying something bad about someone else—Latter-day Saints and their leaders—does your opinion make such statements true? If it is shown to be false or misinformed due to your poor interpretation, then how can anything you present be trusted?” This reversal highlights the lack of intellectual charity in their critique and challenges the integrity of their arguments.
Ultimately, the issue is not whether personal revelation or visions are valid, but whether critics are willing to engage in an honest exploration of these experiences. The biblical record is replete with examples of God revealing His will through personal communication. To dismiss this principle outright is to deny the richness of God’s relationship with humanity. Instead of condemning those who testify of personal revelation, critics might do well to consider the broader question: If God has spoken in the past, is it not possible that He continues to speak today?
The discussion surrounding personal revelation should invite deeper reflection and meaningful dialogue, not divisive rhetoric or manipulative tactics. It is through mutual respect and a genuine pursuit of truth that we can hope to understand one another’s faith and experiences more fully.
Understanding Personal Revelation
Latter-day Saints agree with Christians where personal revelation is a deeply spiritual communion with God and delivered through the Holy Spirit. It is through this process where individuals are able to receive clarity and direction. It is a keystone of the spiritual disciplines of a genuine disciple of Christ. Coupled with reading, studying, and pondering the scriptures.
Cornerstone to the Latter-day Saint Christian faith and theology is personal revelation. This idea emphasizes how individuals are able to receive divine direction and guidance through the power and gift of the Holy Spirit. Speaking to the disciples - Christ taught that when he the, Spirit of truth, shall come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come (John 16:13, KJV). The context of this passage is Christ is revealing to the disciples that he will returning back to the Father. This revelation seemed to cause the disciples consternation. However, he promised that he will send the Comforter.
Christ gives reason for sending the comforter:
- Will come to reprove the world of sin
- Will come to reveal path of righteousness
- Will come with judgment
The Savior gives reason for this: First, the Holy Spirit will come to reprove sin because of unbelief in who Christ is and the lack of believing on Christ; Second, of righteousness because Christ will return to the father and the Holy Spirit - or the Comforter - will continue to guide the disciples on the path of righteousness; and Third, will come in judgment because the prince of the present world is judged. Christ further shares this:
I have many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now. Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come. He shall glorify me: for he shall receive of mine, and shall shew it unto you. All thins that the Father hath are mine: therefore said I, that he shall take of mine, and shall shew it unto you. (John 16:5-16, KJV).
It is this promise of the Holy Spirit that we find throughout scripture: Joel 2:28-32; John 14:15-26; Acts 2:1-13; Acts 10:44-48; Acts 19:1-7. And it is the purpose and mission of the Holy Spirit is to reveal unto humanity, and affirm, the truth of God. Greek for truth in this passage is alethia and implies more than a factual accuracy, it implies a divine reality. This divine reality suggests a new era in God's redemptive plan, where the Spirit will dwell within believers and guiding them in understanding how to live out God's truth. It is this understanding where divine personal revelation is important to the Christian.
Divine Personal Revelation Through the Holy Spirit
Divine personal revelation, as received through the Holy Spirit, refers to the profound and transformative reality that individuals can experience direct guidance, inspiration, and insight from God. This sacred connection enables individuals to:
- Be Led, Guided, and Shown the Way
Through the Holy Spirit, believers gain an assurance of faith that fosters spiritual growth and a deeper understanding of God’s truth. This truth encompasses the full revelation of God’s will and purpose, as unveiled in scripture and exemplified in the life and teachings of Jesus Christ. It is an ongoing, personal guidance that ensures those who faithfully follow Christ are never left to navigate their spiritual journey alone. The Spirit’s influence illuminates the path of righteousness, providing clarity amidst confusion and direction in times of uncertainty. - Receive Conviction of Sin Leading to Repentance and Forgiveness
The Holy Spirit plays a crucial role in convicting individuals of sin, acting as a divine catalyst for repentance and spiritual transformation. This conviction occurs in two significant ways:- For Those Yet to Come to Faith: The Holy Spirit works to convict individuals of their transgressions, leading them to a state of godly sorrow and contrition. This is often the pivotal moment of spiritual awakening, where individuals feel deeply “pricked in their hearts” and are drawn to seek reconciliation with God.
- For Believers Who Stray: For those already walking in faith, the Spirit offers gentle, corrective reminders when they deviate from God’s teachings. This conviction is not punitive but restorative, encouraging humility, repentance, and a return to obedience. However, as Ephesians 4:29-32 warns, persistent disobedience and unrepentant attitudes grieve the Holy Spirit, which may result in His withdrawal, leaving individuals to face the consequences of their choices without divine guidance.
- Facilitate Spiritual Growth Toward Holiness
The Holy Spirit dwells within believers, empowering them to grow spiritually and become a “holy and righteous” people (1 Peter 2:24). This transformative process, known as sanctification, involves being conformed to the image and likeness of Christ (Romans 8:29). As the Spirit works within, believers become living temples of God, sanctified vessels through which His presence resides and operates. - Reveal God’s Will and Plan
According to 1 Corinthians 2:10-11, those who come to faith and receive the gift of the Holy Spirit gain the capacity to discern and understand God’s will. The Holy Spirit, as the source of divine wisdom, power, and authority, enables individuals to receive personal revelation. This divine insight equips believers to fulfill their purpose and participate in God’s work. Jesus Himself acknowledged the necessity of the Spirit’s power and authority in His followers’ lives. He promised that the Holy Spirit would empower them to minister effectively in His name. Paul emphasizes this truth in his letter to the Gentile Christians in Ephesus, highlighting the Spirit’s role in granting wisdom and revelation (Ephesians 1:17-20). Through the Spirit, believers gain access to the strength and insight required to carry out God’s mission.
Scripture Reading, Prayer, and Faithful Obedience
A keystone for receiving personal revelation—even heavenly visions—lies in practicing spiritual disciplines: scripture reading, prayer (often coupled with fasting), and faithful obedience. These practices unlock the divine potential to receive sacred, personal guidance in our lives. This does not involve substituting scripture or redefining doctrine; rather, it enhances our understanding of how God’s teachings apply personally to us. Elder Richard G. Scott captured this beautifully1:
“The feeling of peace is the most common confirming witness that I personally experience. When I have been very concerned about an important matter, struggling to resolve it without success, I continued those efforts in faith. Later, an all-pervading peace has come, settling my concerns, as He has promised.”
This peace, often accompanying personal revelation, is consistent with scripture. In Doctrine and Covenants 6:23, the Lord reminded Oliver Cowdery how He had spoken peace to his mind about a specific matter. Similarly, in Doctrine and Covenants 8:2–3, the Lord explained how revelation is received:
"I will tell you in your mind and in your heart by the Holy Ghost, which shall come upon you and which shall dwell in your heart. Now behold, this is the spirit of revelation; behold, this is the spirit by which Moses brought the children of Israel through the Red Sea on dry ground."
Elder David A. Bednar confirmed that revelation often comes as inspired thoughts to the mind and feelings to the heart2. Doctrine and Covenants 11:13 and Mosiah 4:20 further emphasize that these impressions enlighten the mind and fill the heart with joy. Joseph Smith described it as a flood of pure intelligence, manifesting as sudden strokes of ideas:
“A person may profit by noticing the first intimation of the spirit of revelation; for instance, when you feel pure intelligence flowing into you, it may give you sudden strokes of ideas, so that by noticing it, you may find it fulfilled the same day or soon; (i.e.) those things that were presented unto your minds by the Spirit of God, will come to pass; and thus by learning the Spirit of God and understanding it, you may grow into the principle of revelation, until you become perfect in Christ Jesus.”
Addressing Misconceptions About Personal Revelation
One frequent criticism of Latter-day Saint Christians involves the concept of the "burning in the bosom." Critics often reference Jeremiah 17:9—“The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?”—to dismiss the validity of personal revelation, particularly as it pertains to confirming the truthfulness of the Book of Mormon, Joseph Smith’s prophetic calling, and the Restoration. These arguments attempt to reduce genuine spiritual experiences to mere emotional reactions, insisting that feelings are inherently deceptive.
However, this interpretation of Jeremiah 17:9 misses the broader context. A careful exegesis reveals that the verse addresses Judah’s sin of idolatry and the consequences of departing from God’s ways. The chapter contrasts those who trust in man with those who trust in God. Verses 7–8 promise blessings for those who place their trust in the Lord:
“Blessed is the man that trusteth in the Lord, and whose hope the Lord is. For he shall be as a tree planted by the waters, and that spreadeth out her roots by the river, and shall not see when heat cometh, but her leaf shall be green; and shall not be careful in the year of drought, neither shall cease from yielding fruit.”
This imagery of a tree rooted by rivers of water aligns closely with Psalm 1:1–3:
“Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor standeth in the way of sinners, nor sitteth in the seat of the scornful. But his delight is in the law of the LORD; and in his law doth he meditate day and night. And he shall be like a tree planted by the rivers of water, that bringeth forth his fruit in his season; his leaf also shall not wither; and whatsoever he doeth shall prosper.”
This passage beautifully illustrates the transformative power of rooting ourselves in God’s word. A tree planted by rivers of water not only survives but thrives, regardless of external conditions. Similarly, those who immerse themselves in scripture and prayer are spiritually sustained, even amidst life's trials. The promise is clear: meditating on God’s law produces spiritual fruit, resilience, and prosperity.
Meditation, in this context, is not passive reflection but an active engagement with God’s word. It requires pondering, applying, and internalizing scripture until it becomes a source of daily strength and guidance. As we do so, personal revelation flows more freely, and the Holy Spirit illuminates the path we are to walk.
Far from being an abstract concept, this principle has practical applications. Personal revelation strengthens faith, clarifies decisions, and provides comfort during uncertainty. The more consistently we engage in scripture study, prayer, and faithful obedience, the more attuned we become to the voice of the Spirit. In moments of doubt or spiritual drought, these disciplines anchor us, allowing us to draw deeply from the living waters of Christ’s love and guidance.
Thus, the "burning in the bosom" and other forms of spiritual confirmation are not emotional deceptions but divine gifts. They are the fruits of a life rooted in faith, scripture, and obedience, ensuring we remain steadfast in the face of worldly challenges.
"Did our hearts not burn within us?" Luke 24:32
On the road to Emmaus two disciples were traveling days after the crucifixion of Christ. While one of the disciples remained unnamed, the other is known as Cleopas - or Alpheus, and quite possibly the brother of Joseph, Christ's supposed father. Along their journey, a third man joined them. The discussion focused on the life and ministry of Jesus and how he may still be alive after his tomb was found empty. This Biblical narrative is one of three resurrection appearances recorded in the Gospel of Luke.
Geographically, Emmaus is approximately 7 miles from Jerusalem. And this narrative takes place on the very day of Christ's resurrection. It is during this conversation where the Savior cited scriptures:
And beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, he explained to them what was said in the scriptures concerning himself. As they approached the village to which they were going, Jesus continued on as if he were going farther. But they urged him strongly, "Stay with us, for it is nearly evening; the day is almost over." So he went in to stay with them. When he was at the table with them, he took bread, gave thanks, broke it and began to give it to them. Then their eyes were opened and they recognized him, and he disappeared from their sight. They asked each other, "were not our hearts burning within us while he talked with us on the road and opened the scriptures unto us?"
John Gill's commentary explains this verse3:
And they said one to another After Christ was gone, being surprised at what happened, that they should not know him all that while; and that as soon as they did, he should disappear, or withdraw himself in this manner: did not our hearts burn within us while he talked with us by the way, and while he opened to us the Scriptures? concerning himself, his sufferings, death, and resurrection, which are in Moses, the Prophets, and the Psalms.
The Scriptures are as a sealed book to men, learned and unlearned; and none so fit to open them as the lion of the tribe of Judah: he did open and explain them to these his disciples, as well as conversed with them about other things, as they travelled together; and his words came with such evidence, power, and sweetness, that they were ravished with them; their minds were irradiated with beams and rays of divine light; their hearts were warmed and glowed within them; they became fervent in spirit, and their affections were raised and fired; they found the word to be as burning fire within them; and they now knew somewhat what it was to be baptized with fire, which is Christ's peculiar office to administer; see ( Psalms 39:3 ) ( Jeremiah 20:9 ) they seem as it were not only to reflect on these things with wonder and pleasure, but also to charge themselves with want of thought, with inattention and stupidity; since they might have concluded from the uncommon evidence, force, and energy with which his words came to them, who he was, seeing no man could speak as he did, and with such effect as his words had.
It is through study and meditation upon God's word where one experiences a glowing heart. One aspect of this, according to Clarke's commentary4, reflects the nature of one's heart being veiled or blinded and then receiving revelation through scripture where a person's mind and heart are open in receiving wisdom and direction.
Dallin H. Oaks offers insight regarding what this burning in the bosom is whereby a person receives a sense of peace, warmth, serenity, and goodness5. Furthermore, this idea is one that Christ reveals as something feeling right where there is a strong conviction (Doctrine and Covenants 9:8). It is a feeling that is accompanied by a strong conviction motivating one to take necessary action. A gentle nudge or impression.
Often times, I have experienced this in multiple ways, each moment leaving a profound impact on my life. One remarkable moment was when I had left the LDS Faith and attended an Assemblies of God Church in search of solace and community. There, I worked as the custodian for the church, which allowed me to immerse myself in a new environment and meet diverse individuals who offered perspectives different from my own. I was distraught over a phone conversation I had with my father that was quite upsetting, feeling as if the bond we once shared was fraying. When others saw how upset I was, they inquired with genuine concern, prompting me to open up just a little. I shared some of what happened, however, I felt dismissed and that left me frustrated, as if my emotions were invalidated by those who didn’t truly understand my struggle.
Seeking a moment of peace, I stepped out of the church and sat on the front steps, feeling the weight of my thoughts pressing down on me. Suddenly, a vehicle drove past, made a U-turn, and a young man quickly came up to me and sat next to me without hesitation. All I remember is what he said, "The spirit asked me to turn around and come here where you are," words that resonated deeply within me at that moment. His simple yet profound statement brought a wave of comfort and understanding, a feeling filled with conviction that perhaps I was not alone after all, and that there were still connections to be made in the midst of my turmoil.
Isaiah 40:8: The Eternal Word of God
Isaiah 40:8 states: "The grass withereth, the flower fadeth: but the word of our God shall stand for ever." Critics often use this verse to assert the inerrancy of the Bible, positing that it emphasizes the unchangeable nature of God's word. However, an exegetical examination reveals a deeper layer of meaning where "the word of our God" refers primarily to the enduring covenants and purposes of God, rather than solely to the physical text of scripture itself.
This distinction is crucial because the physical text has faced significant challenges over the centuries, being subjected to human transmission and translation errors. Copies of the scriptures have been produced by fallible scribes who, despite their best intentions, were not free from mistakes. These errors can lead to differing interpretations and variations, suggesting that one must approach the text with a measure of scholarly caution. The implications of this understanding invite a more nuanced view of biblical inerrancy—one that recognizes both the divine inspiration of scripture and the historical realities of its transmission.
The LDS Gospel Topics essay on Biblical inerrancy further elaborates on this complexity. It acknowledges that while the Bible is indeed divinely inspired, it has traversed the hands of imperfect scribes and translators, resulting in textual variants that exist throughout different manuscripts. This acknowledgment does not, however, diminish the Bible’s spiritual authority; rather, it enriches our comprehension of divine communication. The essay posits that the ongoing revelation through prophets and personal spiritual experiences should also be considered part of the continuum of God’s word.
In this light, the faith community is encouraged to engage with scripture not just as a static document but as a living testament to God’s ongoing relationship with humanity. This perspective allows for a greater understanding of how divine truths manifest and evolve over time, inviting believers to seek wisdom amid the complexities of religious texts and their interpretations. The embrace of both ancient and modern revelations allows for a richer dialogue about faith, authority, and the nature of divine guidance in our contemporary world.
Addressing the First Vision Accounts: Consistency Amid Variants
Life After Ministries' claim of "11 different First Vision accounts" is factually incorrect. In reality, there are four primary accounts6 recorded between 1832 and 1842, which reflect Joseph Smith’s growing understanding of his experience. Each account serves as a different lens through which we can examine the various aspects of the First Vision, illustrating how his perception of this pivotal moment evolved over time.
The variations in detail are consistent with how personal narratives can change and adapt when retold for different audiences or purposes. This is a phenomenon well-supported by memory studies in psychology, which demonstrate that human recollection is influenced by context, audience, and individual growth. As people recount their experiences, especially significant ones like the First Vision, their narratives can shift to highlight different themes or details that resonate more closely with their current circumstances or beliefs.
Critics who dismiss the First Vision’s integrity due to these variants should also take a closer look at the textual inconsistencies found in Paul’s conversion accounts as described in the Book of Acts (Acts 9:3–7; Acts 22:6–11; Acts 26:13–18). These accounts, much like Smith's reports, differ in specific details yet maintain a consistent essence, focusing on Paul’s profound encounter with Christ and the transformative call to ministry that follows. Understanding these discrepancies in both cases invites a broader discourse on how religious experiences and narratives can be interpreted and understood within their historical and cultural contexts.
In examining both Joseph Smith's First Vision and Paul’s conversion, one finds a rich tapestry of spiritual experiences that reflect deeper truths, regardless of the differences in chronology or detail. This approach encourages a more nuanced consideration of faith narratives, ultimately fostering a better understanding of how divine encounters shape religious belief and personal identity across different eras and individuals.
Textual Variants in the Bible: A Testament of Human Transmission
The Bible’s transmission history illustrates its enduring significance despite textual challenges. The Dead Sea Scrolls, Septuagint (LXX), and Ugaritic texts demonstrate textual variations that enrich our understanding of biblical manuscripts. These early texts not only reveal the diverse interpretations of scripture but also highlight the historical and cultural contexts in which they were produced. For instance, the Dead Sea Scrolls provide invaluable insights into the beliefs and practices of the Jewish sect that curated them, while the Septuagint offers a glimpse into how ancient Jews in the Hellenistic world understood their sacred texts. Furthermore, the Ugaritic texts contribute to our comprehension of linguistic nuances and literary forms prevalent during the time the biblical narratives were being composed. Examples include:
- The long ending of Mark (Mark 16:9–20) and the woman caught in adultery (John 7:53–8:11), which are later additions not found in earlier manuscripts, have been a topic of significant debate among biblical scholars and historians. These passages, often regarded as controversial, exemplify the complexities of textual transmission and the challenges in determining the authenticity of scripture as they were likely included to convey moral teachings or amplify narratives within the biblical text.
- Questions surrounding the authorship and inclusion of books like Hebrews, Jude, and Revelation highlight the complexities of canon formation, raising important discussions about theological implications, historical context, and the criteria that early church leaders utilized in determining which texts were deemed authoritative and worthy of inclusion within the biblical canon.
- Deuteronomy 32:8-9 is shown to have been redacted from Sons of God to Children of Israel. This alteration does not fit within the scope of the Table of Nations, given where Israel was not yet a nation at that time. Additionally, the LXX (Septuagint) and the Dead Sea Scrolls illustrate how the original text may have been rendered to reflect more of a pantheon and hierarchal aspect of the Ancient Hebraic view of the Divine Council. This insight comes from the significant scholarly discoveries of both the Ugaritic Texts and the Dead Sea Scrolls, which provide fascinating context to the understanding of the text and its implications on the perception of divinity and society in ancient times.
These textual issues underscore the necessity of ongoing scholarly inquiry, revealing how deeply intertwined our understanding of scripture is with the historical contexts in which it was written. The recognition that scripture was shaped by historical contexts and human hands highlights the importance of examining the cultural, social, and political influences that have impacted its formation over time.
By delving into these complexities, scholars can more accurately interpret the various nuances and meanings embedded within the texts, ultimately enriching our understanding of their significance in both ancient and contemporary settings. The dynamic interplay between faith and history necessitates a rigorous, critical approach to scripture, encouraging us to seek deeper insights that honor both the sacred nature of these writings and the realities of the human experience that shaped them.
The Documentary Hypothesis and Deuteronomic Reform
The Documentary Hypothesis7 posits that the Pentateuch is a compilation of various sources (e.g., J, E, P, D) woven together over centuries, reflecting diverse theological perspectives and historical contexts. This theory not only provides insights into the literary structure of these foundational texts but also aligns with historical evidence of Deuteronomic reform8 9under King Josiah (2 Kings 22–23)10, which centralized worship in Jerusalem1112 and emphasized covenant renewal.
The reforms initiated by Josiah were pivotal in shaping the religious landscape of ancient Israel, aiming to consolidate the practice of worship and eliminate polytheistic influences that had infiltrated the community. These developments suggest that scripture has been redacted and adapted over time to reflect evolving theological emphases, responding to the socio-political realities faced by the people of Israel, while also reinforcing the notion of a singular, unified worship of Yahweh as integral to their identity and survival.
Examples of the documentary hypothesis are given:
- Genesis 1:1-2:4 appears to come from the priestly source (P), characterized by its structured narrative and formal style, while the second account of Genesis 2:5-24, with its more anthropomorphic descriptions of God, originates from the Jahwist source (J), reflecting a different theological perspective that emphasizes the relational aspects of creation.
- Noahic Flood story appears redacted in Genesis 6. The Coptic version of Enoch provides insight into the reason the world was to be destroyed by the flood. This pseudepigraphic work gives narrative to Angels coming down and cohabitating with women and creating the Nephilim. Teaching humanity agriculture, metallurgy to fashion weapons of war and other hidden knowledge and understandings. This caused humanity to become wicked and morally corrupt, leading to increased violence and a separation from divine expectations. Additionally, the Biblical Flood story mirrors the much older flood story found in Ancient Sumerian and Mesopotamia, suggesting a common ancient narrative that carries profound implications on the understanding of divine judgment and redemption across cultures.
- Probably the biggest issue is how the Deuteronomic reform redaction of messianic prophecies of Christ and the promised hope of redemption for Israel has been interpreted through various theological lenses, leading to different understandings and implications for both historical and contemporary faith practices.
Textual Variants in English Bible Translations
The history of English Bible translations reveals how theological biases influenced textual decisions. For example, the choice of certain words and phrases often reflected the translators' personal beliefs and the religious context of their time, shaping not only the meaning but also the interpretation of key doctrines.
These translations were not merely attempts to render Scripture into a new language; they were also profoundly intertwined with the political and ecclesiastical struggles of their eras, such as the Reformation and the subsequent rise of various denominations. As a result, some translations emphasized doctrines like justification by faith, while others might have leaned towards a more sacramental view.
This intricate relationship between theology and translation highlights how each version of the Bible serves not just as a religious text, but also as a historical document showcasing the evolution of beliefs throughout the centuries.
- The King James Version, widely regarded and historically significant, reflects Protestant doctrinal priorities, emphasizing the theological tenets important to its time and shaping the beliefs of countless followers throughout the centuries.
- Modern translations like the NIV or ESV differ in rendering key passages, such as Romans 8:1, where manuscript variations affect theological interpretation, showcasing the significant impact these differences can have on readers' understanding of grace, condemnation, and assurance in the Christian faith.
These discrepancies highlight the need for careful study and reliance on the Spirit for discernment (James 1:5), emphasizing that in our pursuit of truth and understanding, we must not only engage with the text at surface level but also delve deeper into its meanings and implications. By doing so, we open ourselves to the guidance offered by the Spirit, fostering a relationship that allows for greater clarity and wisdom. This process requires patience and diligence, as we confront complex interpretations and varying perspectives, all while seeking to align our understanding with divine wisdom.
Conclusion: Faith, Revelation, and the Bible’s Role
It is not about denying the Bible’s divinity, but about recognizing that it reflects both divine inspiration and human influence. As Latter-day Saints, we affirm the Bible’s sacredness while embracing additional scripture (e.g., the Book of Mormon) and modern revelation as part of God’s unfolding work. This understanding nurtures a deeper appreciation for the text, as it holds both the pure essence of divine communication and elements shaped by the historical and cultural context of its authors. Such a perspective is not a dismissal of scripture but an affirmation of its central role in guiding faith and understanding throughout the ages.
Rather than relying on proof-texting or fragmented arguments, believers should approach scripture holistically, letting the narratives interweave and inform one another. This method encourages a personal and communal exploration of faith. By seeking the Spirit’s guidance in our study of scripture, we can uncover eternal truths that transcend mere textual analysis. Each verse is a part of a grander tapestry woven through time, and understanding it in relation to other writings enriches our grasp of its messages.
In doing so, we honor the Bible’s sacred purpose and the ongoing work of God in revealing His will to His children. Such an engagement fosters a living dialogue with God, where scripture is not merely a book of laws or historical accounts but a vibrant source of wisdom and inspiration for daily living. Believers are encouraged to reflect deeply on the teachings, seeking a personal connection that invites divine insight and understanding, thereby allowing the scriptures to transform their lives in significant ways. This perspective not only strengthens individual faith but also builds a more robust community of believers committed to following God’s will collectively.
I welcome anyone from Life After Ministry, who claim to be leading people to the Real Jesus, to engage in a thoughtful dialogue about their perspectives and motivations. I am particularly interested in understanding how they justify and rationalize their criticism—what foundational beliefs or experiences inform their stance? Furthermore, I wonder if they are truly willing to admit when they may have erred in their statements or views and correct any misinformation that may arise from those errors.
It is also essential to evaluate their readiness to apologize for engaging in deceptive tactics, where they may inadvertently be bearing false witness against others. Ultimately, the pursuit of truth should be rooted in integrity, and I encourage a culture where transparency prevails, allowing for open discussions about doubts and faith crises that can arise from manipulated information. Through this, we can foster a more compassionate environment where everyone seeks the Real Jesus in earnest sincerity and love.
ENDNOTES
- Richard G. Scott, “Using the Supernal Gift of Prayer,” Liahona, May 2007, 10. ↩︎
- David A. Bednar, “Teach Them to Understand” (Ricks College campus education week devotional, June 4, 1998) ↩︎
- John Gill's Exposition of the Bible - Luke 24:32. ↩︎
- Clarke's Commentary: And they said one to another, Did not our heart burn within us, while he talked with us by the way, and while he opened to us the scriptures?
Did not our heart burn within us - His word was in our heart as a burning fire, Jeremiah 20:9. Our hearts waxed hot within us, and while we were musing the fire burned, Psalm 39:3. In some such way as this the words of the disciples may be understood: but there is a very remarkable reading here in the Codex Bezae; instead of καιομενη, burned, it has κεκαλυμμενη, veiled; and one of the Itala has, fuit excaecatum, was blinded. Was not our heart veiled (blinded) when he conversed with us on the way, and while he unfolded the Scriptures to us, seeing we did not know him? Luke 24:3 ↩︎ - Dallin H. Oaks, “In His Own Time, In His Own Way,” Liahona, Aug. 2013, 28. ↩︎
- Gospel Topics Essays: First vision Accounts; see also The Joseph Smith Papers: Accounts of Joseph Smith's First Vision. Faithful Answers, Informed Responses (FAIR) also address the nuances of multiple accounts of the First Vision. ↩︎
- Townsend, Colby J. (2014) "The Case for the Documentary Hypothesis, Historical Criticism, and the Latter-day Saints," Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship: Vol. 9, Article 4. ↩︎
- Weinfeld, M. (1996) "Deuteronomy's Theological Revolution" Biblical Archaeology Society Library ↩︎
- Christensen, Kevin (2003) "Nephi, Wisdom, and the Deuteronomist Reform," Insights: The Newsletter of the Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship: Vol. 23: No. 2, Article 3 ↩︎
- Neal Rappleye, "The Deuteronomist Reforms and Lehi’s Family Dynamics: A Social Context for the Rebellions of Laman and Lemuel." Interpreter: A Journal of Mormon Scripture 16 (2015): 87-99 ↩︎
- Miano, D. "The Deuteronomic History | My Jewish Learning" ↩︎
- Cogan, M. (2024). Deuteronomy Revamps King Hezekiah’s Failed Reform. TheTorah.com. See also: Cogan, M. (2023). Deuteronomy’s Wilderness Account: Ancient Revisionist History. TheTorah.com. ↩︎
No comments:
Post a Comment