Exploring the Prayer of the Apostle Paul – Ancient Wisdom for Modern Faith
The Prayer of the Apostle Paul is one of the most intriguing and spiritually rich texts found in the Nag Hammadi Library, an essential collection of ancient Christian and Gnostic writings discovered in 1945. This unique prayer, translated by Dieter Mueller, is located on the front flyleaf of Codex I (Jung Codex), offering a rare and profound insight into early Christian thought beyond the canonical scriptures.
Paul, one of the most influential figures in early Christianity, is widely known for his prayers recorded in his New Testament epistles, such as those in Ephesians, Philippians, and Colossians. His biblical prayers emphasize themes of spiritual growth, divine wisdom, strength through the Holy Spirit, and unity in Christ. However, the Prayer of the Apostle Paul, preserved in the Gnostic tradition, expands on these themes by delving deeper into mystical understanding, divine illumination, and personal transformation—concepts that resonate with both Christian and esoteric traditions.
This prayer calls upon the supreme, ineffable God and reflects Paul’s desire for spiritual enlightenment, not only for himself but for all who seek a profound connection with the Divine. It echoes the yearning of the human soul to transcend worldly limitations and attain a deeper, spiritual awakening. Whether interpreted through the lens of traditional Christian theology or viewed as a Gnostic meditation, the Prayer of the Apostle Paul offers a timeless message of divine wisdom, inner transformation, and the pursuit of truth.
In today’s fast-paced and often chaotic world, where people struggle with uncertainty, doubt, and spiritual disconnection, Paul’s ancient words still hold immense relevance. This prayer encourages believers and seekers alike to look beyond the material realm, seek divine wisdom, and cultivate a deeper faith that transcends religious boundaries. By exploring this ancient text, modern readers can find inspiration, strength, and a renewed sense of purpose in their spiritual journey.
🌟 Read the full article on Medium to dive deeper into the meaning, history, and modern significance of Paul’s prayer.
Join our Mindful Latter-day Saint Christian Living & Apologetics community today for $10.00 per month or $120 per year. Arm yourself with knowledge, build your testimony, and engage with faith-focused insights that uplift and inspire. Subscribe now for full access!
In an era where social media amplifies criticism and contention, members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints face an increasing wave of digital opposition. From historical distortions to modern ideological pressures, faith is often put on trial in the court of public opinion. Critics—both external and internal—use social media to challenge, mock, and undermine core beliefs, creating confusion and division among faithful members. This exclusive deep dive into the phenomenon of Latter-day Saint-baiting sheds light on the history, tactics, and evolving digital landscape of these attacks—and, most importantly, how members can fortify their faith in the face of opposition.
Understanding the History of Religious Criticism
Religious opposition is not new, but the rise of Mormon-baiting—a targeted strategy to provoke and discredit faithful members—has evolved significantly. From 19th-century anti-Mormon literature to 20th-century evangelical counter-cult movements, critics have long sought to redefine the Church’s message through misinformation. Now, in the 21st century, viral posts, algorithm-driven engagement, and ex-Mormon influencers continue this trend, adapting old criticisms for a digital audience.
Modern-Day Faith Challenges: The Social Media Battleground
Today’s critics weaponize online platforms, often distorting Church teachings, spreading half-truths, and using emotional manipulation to foster doubt. This investigation examines:
The rise of ex-Mormon influencers who frame their departures as moral awakenings, encouraging others to follow.
Evangelical apologists who use selective doctrine to paint Latter-day Saints as non-Christian.
Internal critics who challenge Church leadership and doctrine, pushing for alignment with societal trends.
Through these tactics, critics aim to erode faith by presenting their narratives as the “real truth.” Their influence extends beyond theology, affecting discussions on gender, race, politics, and historical controversies.
How to Strengthen Your Testimony Amidst Criticism
In a world where faith is publicly scrutinized, it’s critical to strengthen testimony, recognize manipulative tactics, and engage with wisdom and love. This exclusive content provides practical strategies for navigating online debates, maintaining spiritual resilience, and ensuring that personal faith remains unshaken. Topics include:
Discerning misinformation and emotional manipulation in social media debates.
Responding with clarity, confidence, and Christlike love when facing antagonism.
Building resilience through scripture study, prayer, and prophetic guidance.
Leveraging social media positively to amplify faith-based messages.
Exclusive Access: Equip Yourself with Truth
This deep-dive article is part of a premium collection designed to empower Latter-day Saints to navigate modern faith challenges with confidence. As a subscriber, you gain access to exclusive faith-based content, in-depth apologetics, and strategies for strengthening personal discipleship in an increasingly polarized world.
When Joseph Smith lost the 116 pages of the Book of Mormon manuscript, it wasn’t just a personal failure—it was a turning point. Doctrine and Covenants 3:1–22 reveals how God responded with both rebuke and reassurance, teaching that His work cannot be stopped by human mistakes. These verses are a reminder that trusting God's wisdom, even in moments of failure, brings unexpected strength and clarity. For Latter-day Saints today, this section offers profound lessons on repentance, faith, and the unwavering nature of God’s purposes.
God’s Work Cannot Be Frustrated
The events of Doctrine and Covenants 3 make one thing clear: God's work moves forward, no matter the setbacks or mistakes we face.
Elder Bruce R. McConkie (1915–1985) of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles clarified what is meant by God’s course being “one eternal round” (D&C 3:2): “God governs by law—wholly, completely, invaryingly, and always. He has ordained that identical results always flow from the same causes. There is no respect of persons with him, and he is a Being ‘with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning.’ (Jas. 1:17; D. & C. 3:1–2.) Hence, the Lord’s ‘course is one eternal round, the same today as yesterday, and forever.’ (D. & C. 35:1)” (Mormon Doctrine, 2nd ed. [1966], 545–46).
While human actions may cause delays or shifts, they cannot derail the eternal plan laid out by an all-powerful and all-knowing God. For Latter-day Saints, this truth offers reassurance and strength, even in moments of personal failure or struggle.
God’s Eternal Plan
God's omniscience and omnipotence mean that His divine plan is always on course. As 1 Nephi 9:6 states, "The Lord knoweth all things from the beginning." This scripture reminds us that nothing catches God off guard. He sees past, present, and future all at once, as emphasized in Doctrine and Covenants 130:7. Because His path is straight and unchanging, we can trust that chaos or opposition won’t disrupt His purposes.
“Man’s successes and failures were known from the beginning by the Lord and were taken into account by Him in the unfolding of His plan of salvation. (See 1 Ne. 9:6.) His purposes will be fully achieved” (“Shine as Lights in the World,” Ensign, May 1983, 11).
Have you ever tried to stop a river from flowing with just your hands? It's impossible. God's plan is like that strong, flowing river—completely unstoppable. Even when obstacles arise, God has already prepared a way to work around them. The lost 116 pages of translation are a perfect example. While it seemed devastating at the time, this “loss” turned into an opportunity to teach us deeper lessons about obedience, faith, and repentance.
Turning Setbacks into Opportunities
The loss of the 116 manuscript pages could have been a paralyzing blow to the early efforts of Joseph Smith and the restoration of the gospel. Instead, it became a humbling moment for Joseph and a teaching tool for all of us. God used this event to highlight that His work is not dependent on the success or failure of individuals. Just as Nephi had been instructed to prepare an additional record centuries earlier (1 Nephi 9:5–6), God had already accounted for the loss of the manuscript.
This principle is profoundly comforting in our own lives. Mistakes happen. But God sees those mistakes not as dead ends but as opportunities for growth. Think of a GPS recalculating when you take a wrong turn—it doesn’t tell you to give up. Instead, it redirects you to keep you moving forward. Similarly, God's plan adapts to human error, ensuring that His purposes are fulfilled while giving us the chance to learn and improve.
Even when Satan's aim is to destroy, God counters with wisdom, turning each challenge into a steppingstone. The restoration of the Church, the translation of the Book of Mormon, and the broader gathering of Israel all stand as evidence that God's work cannot be stopped—not by opposition, fear, or failure. Trust in that promise, and you’ll find strength no matter what obstacles arise.
Trusting God Over Fearing Man
When Doctrine and Covenants 3:7 states, “You should not have feared man more than God,” it reveals a truth that resonates across time and circumstances. The tension between trusting God's will and succumbing to human pressures is as real today as it was in Joseph Smith's era. For modern disciples, it’s not just a historical lesson—it's a daily challenge. Let’s explore why fearing man is dangerous and how choosing faith can strengthen us.
The Danger of Fearing Others
When we prioritize human approval over divine guidance, we lose sight of God's greater purpose. The story of Joseph Smith illustrates this perfectly. Pressured by Martin Harris, a trusted friend and supporter, Joseph allowed Martin to take the 116 manuscript pages of the Book of Mormon, even after repeated warnings from God. The pages were lost, and the result: A humbling rebuke from the Lord and an invaluable lesson for all of us.
Fearing others often leads us down "crooked paths" because we focus on short-term comfort instead of eternal truths. As Elder Lynn G. Robbins once taught, “Which way do you face?” is a question every disciple must consider.
Trying to please others before pleasing God is inverting the first and second great commandments (see Matthew 22:37–39). It is forgetting which way we face. And yet, we have all made that mistake because of the fear of men. In Isaiah the Lord warns us, “Fear ye not the reproach of men” (Isaiah 51:7; see also 2 Nephi 8:7). In Lehi’s dream, this fear was triggered by the finger of scorn pointed from the great and spacious building, causing many to forget which way they faced and to leave the tree “ashamed” (see 1 Nephi 8:25–28).
Joseph Smith faced challenges in denying Martin Harris’s persistent requests for the manuscript pages of the Book of Mormon. Martin, over 20 years older, was among the first to support Joseph’s work, providing financial aid and dedicating time to translation efforts. Despite this, the Lord reproved Joseph for yielding to Martin’s pleas, advising him to fear God and trust in His power for support. Elder D. Todd Christofferson of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles explained the significance of fearing God:
“There are many places in the scriptures that counsel mankind to fear God. In our day we generally interpret the word fear as ‘respect’ or ‘reverence’ or ‘love’; that is, the fear of God means the love of God or respect for Him and His law. That may often be a correct reading, but I wonder if sometimes fear doesn’t really mean fear, as when the prophets speak of fearing to offend God by breaking His commandments. …
“I submit that fear of the Lord, or what Paul calls ‘godly fear’ (Hebrews 12:28), should be part of our reverence for Him. We should so love and reverence Him that we fear doing anything wrong in His sight, whatever may be the opinions of or pressure from others” (“A Sense of the Sacred” [Brigham Young University fireside, Nov. 7, 2004], 8; speeches.byu.edu).
Are we trying to please the world, or are we staying aligned with God’s expectations? Scripture provides sobering examples of what happens when people choose the approval of man over obedience to God:
King Saul feared the people and disobeyed God’s command, leading to the loss of his kingdom (1 Samuel 15:24–26).
Pontius Pilate yielded to public pressure, washing his hands of responsibility for Jesus’ crucifixion (Matthew 27:24).
The consequences are clear: misplaced fear can lead to regret, loss, and spiritual disconnection. But the reverse is also true. When we fear God more than man, we align with His will and unlock blessings beyond what the world can offer.
The Courage to Choose Faith
Trusting God in moments of pressure takes courage—plain and simple. It’s not easy to stand firm when family, friends, or society push us to compromise. Yet trusting God over fearing man liberates us from the fleeting opinions of others and gives us the power to act with faith and integrity.
Think about Daniel in the lion’s den or Esther approaching the king. Both chose faith over fear and became instruments in God’s hands. Similarly, when Joseph Smith repented for yielding to human pressures, he received reassurance: he was still "chosen" and "called to the work” (D&C 3:10). This is the empowering truth of faith: God does not abandon us if we seek Him after a misstep.
Here’s how trusting God over man helps us:
Clearer Choices: Faith acts like a compass. When we follow God’s light, decisions become clearer—even in complex moments.
Resilience Under Pressure: Pressure from others may weigh heavy, but God’s strength is heavier. If we trust Him, that strength transfers to us.
Eternal Perspective: Human approval is temporary. God’s approval lasts forever. Faith keeps us focused on the bigger picture.
When we commit to trusting God, we also take a stand for righteousness. Every disciple should ask, “Am I letting fear of criticism stop me from living my faith?” If the answer is yes, it’s an invitation to pivot. Faith doesn’t mean we never feel fear; it means we act courageously despite it.
The next time you find yourself in a moment of decision, remember that choosing God’s plan over others' opinions aligns you with the eternal flow of His work. Nothing can stop that—not human failure, not setbacks, and certainly not fear.
The Blessings of Remaining Faithful
Remaining faithful in challenging times is more than just a demonstration of trust in God—it’s an avenue to experience His boundless love and promises. The scriptures teach that this faithfulness doesn’t just help us survive trials; it refines us, strengthens our spirits, and aligns us with eternal blessings. Let’s explore how faith fosters divine support during trials and leads to long-term spiritual rewards.
Divine Support Through Trials
Faithfulness often feels like clinging to hope in a storm, but God doesn't leave us to weather it alone. The Doctrine and Covenants repeatedly assures us that those who remain faithful will receive divine support. For instance, in Doctrine and Covenants 121:7–8, addressed to Joseph Smith while he was imprisoned in Liberty Jail, the Lord said, “Thy adversity and thine afflictions shall be but a small moment; and then, if thou endure it well, God shall exalt thee on high.”
This promise is not limited to prophets; it extends to all who endure trials with faith. Consider the account in Mosiah 24:14–15, where the Lord strengthened the people of Alma during their bondage. Although their burdens weren’t immediately removed, He made them so light that they could bear them with joy. Isn’t that what many of us need when life presses heavily—strength we didn’t know we had? The Lord’s support acts like an anchor in turbulent waters, keeping us steady when all else threatens to overwhelm.
Sometimes, God sends His strength as quiet assurance during our darkest hours. Other times, He provides it through the hands of friends, family, or kind strangers. Remember, every storm has an end. Just as Joseph Smith eventually walked out of Liberty Jail, we too can trust that our trials, however heavy, are temporary and lead to spiritual growth.
Eternal Blessings of Obedience
Faithfulness doesn’t just bring us through hard times—it paves the way for eternal blessings. Doctrine and Covenants 3:8 declares that those who are faithful will be “delivered... out of the hands of all their enemies.” This deliverance isn’t always immediate or obvious, but it’s a guarantee from God, whose promises never fail.
Obedience and faithfulness work like planting seeds in fertile soil. The effort may feel small and insignificant today, but over time, it grows into a fruitful harvest. It’s this principle that Doctrine and Covenants 104:33–34 captures when it says the faithful will experience a “multiplicity of blessings.” These blessings aren't restricted to the earthly realm—they extend to the eternities, offering us joy, peace, and glory that far exceed our sacrifices.
When we talk of “eternal blessings,” imagine unbreakable family bonds, immortal joy, and the chance to dwell with God forever. Staying faithful is an investment in these rewards. Just as someone might train tirelessly for a marathon to claim the finish-line prize, obedience to God empowers us to finish life’s race with a crown of glory awaiting us.
In moments of doubt or weariness, reflect on this truth: God sees the whole picture, and His rewards outweigh the cost of remaining faithful. While the world might label trials as setbacks, through the gospel lens, they’re setups for immeasurable blessings. Faith anchors us in this eternal perspective.
Repentance and God’s Mercy
Latter-day Saints are taught that no one is immune to mistakes, not even prophets like Joseph Smith. Doctrine and Covenants 3:10 reminds us that while divine correction can be painful, it’s also an invitation to realign with God’s unchanging purposes. In this section, we explore how repentance empowers individuals to turn mistakes into stepping stones and how God’s mercy works hand-in-hand with His justice to refine and uplift His children.
The Power of Repentance
Repentance isn’t a punishment—it’s an opportunity to move forward. When I think about it, repentance reminds me of polishing a dull mirror. We all fall short, leaving smudges on life’s glass. But through sincere repentance, those imperfections are wiped away, restoring clarity and purpose. In Isaiah 1:18, the Lord declares, "Though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow." This metaphor offers incredible hope. No matter how far we wander, God’s grace is big enough to bring us home.
The journey of repentance, however, doesn’t mean we simply say, “I’m sorry,” and move on. Ether 12:27 teaches us that our weaknesses are revealed to us so we can humble ourselves and rely more deeply on God. Consider Joseph Smith’s despair over the lost 116 manuscript pages. His mistake was a heartbreaking moment of failure, but it became the starting point for essential growth. Like Joseph, when we acknowledge fault, we take the first step toward becoming more aligned with God’s will.
Repentance helps us break free from the weight of guilt and regret, giving us the freedom to start fresh. It’s like a traveler shedding a heavy backpack at the foot of a mountain. The climb is far from over, but suddenly it becomes possible. This power to move forward—even after significant missteps—testifies to the strength found in building trust and faith through personal revelation.
God’s Merciful Nature
God balances correction with merciful love, like a master sculptor chiseling away at a stone to reveal a masterpiece. When Doctrine and Covenants 3:10 says, “God is merciful; therefore, repent,” it highlights the supportive and redemptive nature of His corrections. The Lord doesn’t rebuke to punish but to teach and refine, helping us become the best versions of ourselves.
Looking at Joseph Smith’s story, we see this balance in action. As much as God chastened him for fearing man over trusting divine counsel, He also reassured Joseph: “Thou art still chosen.” How incredible is that? Even after significant mistakes, God reminds us that His work of redemption is unending. If you’ve ever felt like your errors define you, remember this truth: God’s mercy means there’s always a path back—so long as we’re willing to walk it.
This balance between justice and mercy is what makes God’s plan perfect. Mercy doesn’t mean condoning sin. It means offering guidance and encouragement to turn back. It’s like standing on the sidelines, cheering for someone to get back on track after slipping off course. As President Eyring has taught, God doesn’t just hear our spoken prayers; He understands the quiet pleadings of our hearts. His mercy meets us where we are, allowing us to progress step by step, no matter how broken we may feel.
The interplay of mercy and discipline ensures we learn without losing hope. Through trials, setbacks, and corrections, God shapes us into something greater than we could imagine on our own. Instead of dwelling on failures, we’re invited to reflect: What is God teaching me through this experience? And more importantly, how can I emerge stronger, wiser, and more compassionate because of it?
God’s Eternal and Unchanging Nature
When Doctrine and Covenants 3:2 states that "God doth not walk in crooked paths," it underscores a profound truth about the divine character: God is constant. His ways, His purposes, and His promises are steady across all time. For Latter-day Saints, this truth is foundational for trust. When everything around us changes—when life feels unpredictable—God remains the anchor we can hold onto.
God’s Unchanging Promises
Imagine standing firm in the middle of a raging storm. The winds howl, the rain lashes, and yet, there's a solid rock beneath your feet that doesn’t move. That solid rock is a perfect image of God’s unchanging nature. Hebrews 13:8 clearly reminds us, "Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and today, and forever." Pair that with Doctrine and Covenants 35:1, where God declares, "I am God, and mine arm is not shortened," and we see a pattern of divine consistency.
This consistency brings comfort because it means God doesn’t shift with cultural trends or human whims. His promises are sure. If He says He will bless the faithful, then He absolutely will. He doesn’t forget, falter, or change direction. For those striving to make difficult decisions or remain strong in their faith, this steadiness is a source of peace. Think about it: how many things in life do we actually trust to remain constant? Relationships, careers, and even personal health can falter, but God's word endures without fail.
Take the example of Joseph Smith in the early days of the Restoration. When faced with seemingly insurmountable challenges—persecution, betrayal, and loss of the 116 manuscript pages—the assurance of God’s unchanging character provided him the courage to move forward. It’s not just a history lesson; it’s a principle alive and relevant for us today. Life's storms test us, but knowing that God's promises hold steady gives us the strength to endure.
Application for Latter-day Saints
How can we apply God's unchanging nature in our daily decisions? It starts with trust. Trusting that God sees the bigger picture even when we don’t. Think of it like driving in heavy fog; you may only see a few feet ahead, but trust in the directions from your GPS keeps you on course. Similarly, God’s reliable nature acts as that divine guide in our lives.
Here are ways this principle applies practically:
Decision-Making: When making tough choices, ask yourself—does this align with God’s teachings? Trust that His way leads to lasting joy, even if it requires temporary sacrifice. Doctrine and Covenants repeatedly emphasizes that obedience brings blessings. Believing in that promise helps you navigate life's crossroads.
Faith Amid Adversity: Have you faced disappointments that made you doubt your path? Remember Joseph Smith’s experience. Losing the manuscript could have seemed like the end to him, but because God’s purposes cannot be frustrated, the work continued. Trust that no error or trial can derail God’s plan for your life.
Peace in Change: When the world feels chaotic, lean on the knowledge that God doesn't change. Trends, opinions, and even global circumstances may shift, but the moral compass set by divine law remains firm.
Latter-day Saints are empowered by this knowledge. Knowing God’s constancy means we are never left to wander without direction. When doubt or worry creeps in, think of His promise in Doctrine and Covenants 35:1: the same God who delivered miracles to His people in ancient times will perform miracles for us now—if we believe and act with faith.
So the question to reflect on is this: Are we building our trust on the unshakable bedrock of God’s character? Or are we allowing the fleeting opinions of the world to erode that foundation? By grounding our choices, faith, and lives in God’s eternal promises, we align ourselves with a power that cannot fail.
Lessons from Martin Harris’s Experience
Martin Harris, a man of great generosity but also human frailty, played a pivotal role in the early days of the Restoration. His story, rooted in both missteps and redemption, offers profound wisdom for those seeking to strengthen their faith and trust in God’s will. Through his experiences, we see lessons in humility and the redemptive power of repentance, both of which are central to discipleship.
Humility in the Face of Failure
Martin Harris’s mistakes, particularly losing the 116 manuscript pages of the Book of Mormon, teach a sobering lesson about humility. Imagine being entrusted with a task of eternal significance and then failing. It’s easy to see how such a moment could cause despair. For Martin, the loss was devastating—not only because it betrayed the trust placed in him by Joseph Smith but also because it came after repeated warnings from the Lord.
This failure underscores the importance of trusting God over personal desires. Martin had persuaded Joseph to repeatedly ask the Lord for permission to take the manuscript, despite earlier denials. His insistence reflected a reliance on his own judgment, rather than trust in God’s timing. When the manuscript vanished, it became a moment of reckoning—not just for Martin, but for anyone who has ever struggled to let go of their will in favor of God’s.
We’ve all been there, haven’t we? When we think we know better or rush ahead without waiting for divine guidance, only to have our plans unravel. Martin’s loss teaches us that humility isn’t optional—it’s essential. True humility allows us to see God’s hand even in our failures and to accept that His timing is far better than our own.
Here’s the takeaway: mistakes aren’t the end of the story. They’re an opportunity to lean into humility, reflect, and recalibrate. Consider how this lesson applies to your life. Are there areas where you’re struggling to yield to God’s will? Perhaps Martin’s story can serve as a reminder that trusting God’s timing always leads to better outcomes.
Repentance as Redemption
What makes Martin Harris’s story remarkable isn’t just his failure—it’s his response. After the manuscript was lost, Martin faced intense guilt and turmoil. Yet, instead of giving up, he sought redemption through repentance. This choice allowed him to continue contributing to the Lord’s work in profound ways.
Martin’s experience exemplifies the principle taught in Doctrine and Covenants 3:10: “Remember, God is merciful; therefore, repent of that which thou hast done.” Even after his mistake, Martin wasn’t cast aside. His repentance opened the door for him to serve as one of the Three Witnesses of the Book of Mormon. Through his testimony of the golden plates, he became a vital witness to the Restoration, impacting countless lives.
Repentance isn’t just about saying, “I’m sorry”; it’s about action. Martin demonstrated this by recommitting himself to the gospel. He mortgaged his farm to finance the printing of the Book of Mormon, showing that his faith outweighed his fear of personal loss. This act of sacrifice and devotion reminds us that repentance isn’t a dead-end—it’s a bridge back to God’s path.
For us, Martin’s story is a testament to the power of grace. No matter how far we stray or how significant our mistakes, God’s mercy provides a way back. Repentance is like resetting a compass—it doesn’t erase the missteps but helps us realign with our divine destination.
What can we learn from Martin’s perseverance? First, that guilt—when coupled with repentance—leads to growth, not stagnation. Second, that God doesn’t measure us by our failures but by our willingness to return to Him. And finally, that our contributions to His work are never beyond repair if we seek forgiveness sincerely.
So ask yourself: are you letting past mistakes hold you back? If so, remember Martin Harris. His story proves that redemption is always possible, and through grace, our best contributions to God’s work may still lie ahead.
Trusting Modern Prophets
The ability to trust modern prophets is a hallmark of Latter-day Saint faith. Just as ancient prophets guided God’s people through revelation and inspiration, today's prophets continue to provide direction in a changing world. For members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, this belief in ongoing revelation reinforces the idea that God still speaks through His chosen servants, offering clarity amidst the noise of contemporary life.
The Role of Prophets in God’s Plan
In Amos 3:7, we read, “Surely the Lord God will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets.” This verse reminds us that prophets are key to God’s communication with His children. From ancient times to today, they’ve served as messengers for His will—not by their own wisdom, but through divine revelation.
Think of prophets as spiritual lighthouses. Just as a lighthouse warns ships of dangerous rocks while guiding them safely to shore, prophets illuminate God’s path, warning against sin and offering clear guidance. Their role isn’t limited to foretelling the future; it’s about forthtelling God’s counsel for the present. For example, when Moses led the Israelites out of bondage, he not only parted the Red Sea but consistently sought God’s will to guide them through their journey. Similarly, modern prophets seek direction for God’s people today, helping them chart a safe course through both personal and societal challenges.
The restoration of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints was itself a testament to prophetic guidance. Through Joseph Smith, God restored truth and set in motion a plan to gather scattered Israel. Each prophet since has carried that mantle. However, their role isn’t about personal infallibility but about faithfully delivering God’s message. They follow divine direction, ensuring that God’s purposes are fulfilled, just as Doctrine and Covenants 3 reminds us about the unstoppable nature of His work.
Why does God do this? Because He loves us. In a world filled with conflicting messages and shifting values, prophets clarify what truly matters: faith, obedience, and trust in God’s wisdom.
Sustaining Inspired Leadership
Trusting a modern prophet requires recognizing their role as an extension of God’s guidance. As Elder M. Russell Ballard taught, while prophets are mortal and imperfect, their inspiration is divine. God works through flawed individuals to achieve perfect purposes, which means sustaining leaders is also an act of faith in Him.
Sustaining Church leaders goes beyond raising a hand in a meeting—it’s about embracing their counsel with humility and prayerful trust. When President Russell M. Nelson has urged members to “let God prevail” in their lives, it’s not merely a slogan; it’s part of a prophetic invitation to prioritize faith amid worldly distractions. Have you ever wondered how your life might change if you truly aligned with prophetic counsel? Sustaining leaders means trusting God enough to follow their teachings, even when it feels challenging or countercultural.
Here are practical ways to sustain Church leaders:
Pray for Them: Just as prophets pray for us, we can pray for their strength and inspiration.
Follow Their Counsel: Modern-day revelation often feels like spiritual guardrails keeping us safe. When we heed their counsel, we align ourselves with God’s will.
Speak Well of Them: Supporting leaders means refraining from idle criticism and remembering their sacred calling.
This doesn’t mean blind obedience. Prophets encourage personal revelation and confirmation. Doctrine and Covenants 1:38 teaches that whether it’s God speaking or His servants, the words are the same. That principle invites us to trust prophetic words as extensions of divine truth while seeking our own witness.
Ultimately, sustaining inspired leadership is an act of trust—not just in them, but in God, who called them. It’s about seeing leaders not as figureheads but as guides helping us return to His presence. Anchoring faith in prophetic guidance ensures we don’t drift in the shifting tides of the world. Instead, we move forward with clarity, purpose, and peace.
Conclusion
Doctrine and Covenants 3:1–22 reminds us that God’s plan is unstoppable, even in the face of human errors. For Latter-day Saints, these verses underscore the importance of trusting Him, repenting when needed, and aligning our choices with His eternal wisdom.
The assurance that God works around our mistakes offers hope and strength. It invites us to rely on His unchanging nature and to view setbacks as opportunities to grow spiritually. Life’s challenges are real, but so is God’s ability to guide and uplift us through them.
The next step is simple yet transformative: embrace the trust Joseph Smith learned to develop. Ask yourself, “How can I trust God more fully in my own life?”
There is an endless stream of criticism against the beliefs, traditions, and views of the Latter-day Saint Christian Faith. These criticisms consistently surface and always lack a fair or informed understanding of what the Restored Gospel actually teaches. Glenn E. Chatfield's recent post, titled "God Had a Father God?" is one such example. And it is not the first time this topic has been brought to my attention - I've already addressed a similar criticism presented by Life After Ministry - where there is a clear misconception. Chatfield merely offered his thoughts and linked to Life After Ministry blog post.
Chatfield also claims that he refutes the LDS on his blog using nothing more than LDS teachings and scriptures. This is not what is in dispute. What is questionable is how he is using LDS Teachings and Scriptures in a way that presents the teachings and doctrines of the Latter-day Saint faith in a false manner. This is accomplished by cherry-picking quotes and scriptures, building strawman arguments, deflection, and even engaging in ad hominem against past and present leaders. Not only that, but critics also tend to project and insult any who may be a Latter-day Saint and attempt to engage in discussion with them. Take for example Chatfield's recent comment to an anonymous commentator:
One of Chatfield's posts, dated May 5, 2022, titled Good Stuff to Peruse, I engaged in a discussion with him regarding this issue. Here is his response:
What was he responding too? Here is my comment.
The point of this is that the individual guilty of any ad hominem is Glen E. Chatfield. Here are some of the personal insults he has used to attack anyone willing to step up to correct any misinformation and refute any erroneous information that is deceptive and manipulative.
He is a cult member defending false teachings: It is inflammatory and outright slanderous
LDS is a demonic and false system: Arbitrarily dismissing any Latter-day Saint and calling them demonic and false.
LDS Apologists merely cause confusion: Again, further dismissal of any rational discussion.
Joseph Smith a lying and false Prophet: insulting and attacking Joseph Smith without evidence and rational thought.
The observable attitude and behavior of critics like Chatfield also show that they are entrenched in such toxic apologetics where they do not hold themselves to the same expected standards of respect that is imposed on others. Meaning, they flippantly call people out for perceived personal insults when they are themselves the one doing the insulting and personal attacks. This is called projection. Critics attempt to push their own insecure and inadequacies upon others and then blame them for the exact behavior they are observed in doing.
The particular criticism that centers around the Latter-day Saint belief of God's nature and the idea God may have had a Father is misconstrued. First, it is oversimplified and framed in a way that does sound quite absurd. On this point - Chatfield is correct. Only correct in the sense that he is manipulating and regurgitating previous information in a way that does sound absurd. Second, it speaks to the nature of how critics, and those who are apostates, are merely lazy learners because often times they do not put forth any effort, energy, and time to honestly engage with the theological nuances of the LDS Faith. Critics often have a rally cry of superiority. "I was a member, I know what I am talking about" or a list of callings and positions of some low hanging fruit of authority. It does not amount to a hill of beans - what matters is whether they are willing to consider the possibility that they may very well be wrong. Sadly, Chatfield, like most critics in my experience of various discussions over the decades of apologetics, is staunch in that they are 100% Correct and use LDS Teachings and scriptures to prove how wrong the LDS Faith is. It is strutting around like a peacock and pontificating intelligence when in reality they are peddling wares of lies and deceptions. Causing confusion and faith crisis and essentially lying in wait to deceive (Ephesians 4:14-15).
Therefore, my aim is to respond to Glenn E. Chatfield (as I know he won't allow me to publish a comment on his post because has articulated how he does not want his audience to be "confused" or "deceived"). It also will shed light on what has already been established addressed regarding the claim is deemed quite absurd.
Rebuttal to Glenn E. Chatfield's Post: God Had a Father God?"
Chatfield's post, that is under scrutiny and examination here, reflects several common misconceptions about LDS teaching, doctrine, and faith. Granted, it is important to take the time to have a cohesive and rational discussion where there are theological differences. However, it is Chatfield's observable attitude and behavior regarding the tone, arguments, and presentation that call into question his credibility and undermine his assertions. He relies heavily on logical fallacies (as well as Life After Ministries). And when he engages in any discussion, it is observed to come from a condescending attitude that lacks empathy, compassion, and genuine engagement. Quite uninviting. He does little to foster any meaningful conversation. Nor does he accurate represent what Latter-day Saints actually believe in - no matter how often he may claim that he is merely quoting LDS teaching, leaders, and scriptures.
Chatfield's presenting argument relies on the following fallacies:
1. Straw Man Fallacy: By grossly misrepresenting LDS teaching and beliefs about God's nature, through oversimplification and caricaturing the LDS beliefs, Chatfield reduces the idea of God having a Father to a mere crude notion of an endless chain of God's (infinite regression idea and teaching interpreted by numerous counter-cult ministries and apostates over the years).
2. False Equivalence: Chatfield claims that the LDS God is "nothing like the God of the Bible". By this reasoning, he is implying that because our understanding differs from creedal Christian belief - it is deemed unbiblical and indefensible. This argument fails in acknowledging how LDS theology is deeply rooted in scripture. This includes teachings about divine parentage (e.g., Hebrews 12:9, which refers to God as the Fathers of spirits). Furthermore, Latter-day saints affirm the divine and omnipotent and eternal nature of God. Aligning closely to the Biblical foundation - even if additional revealed truths expand upon these ideas.
3. Appeal to Ridicule: Employing trigger phrases, like "this is one of those absurd doctrines" are not theological or rational arguments. They are rhetorical mechanisms designed to arbitrarily dismiss LDS beliefs outright. Such hostile and passive aggressive language comes across as arrogant, condescending, and prideful. As such, it discourages any productive and rational discussions. It also reveals a lack of respect for differing perspectives.
4. Circular Reasoning: Chatfield, assuming that the creedal Christian perspective and worldview of God is the only valid interpretation, uses it as the standard by which LDS doctrine and teaching is measured. Doing so, he disregards the plausibility that LDS Teachings offer greater insights due to restored truths that were once lost or obscured.
Addressing the Tone of Condescension and Arrogance
Chatfield’s tone is unnecessarily condescending, as evidenced by statements like “And LDS claims they are Christian?!?!” Such rhetorical flourishes reveal an underlying assumption that his interpretation of Christianity is definitive, leaving no room for differing perspectives. This attitude not only alienates Latter-day Saints but also undermines his credibility as someone seeking genuine theological engagement.
Respectful dialogue should aim to understand the beliefs of others rather than mock them. Latter-day Saints unequivocally affirm Jesus Christ as the Son of God, the Savior of the world, and the central figure in God’s eternal plan. Questioning our Christian identity without careful consideration of our faith’s Christ-centered foundation comes across as dismissive rather than constructive.
The LDS Perspective on the Godhead: Monarchial Monotheism
When properly examined, Latter-day Saint theology reflects a monarchial monotheistic view of the Godhead, distinct yet compatible with biblical principles. This perspective acknowledges one God—God the Father—who reigns supreme, with His Son, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Ghost united in purpose and divinity.
The doctrine of divine parentage and eternal progression, as cited by Orson Pratt in The Seer (p. 132), does not detract from the supremacy of God the Father but rather emphasizes His role as the ultimate source of life and creation. The idea that we are “begotten by our Father in Heaven” and that He, in turn, was begotten by a Father aligns with the biblical notion of God as the “Father of spirits” (Hebrews 12:9) and the principle that “as man is, God once was; as God is, man may become” (Lorenzo Snow). This understanding highlights the eternal nature of God’s work and glory: to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of His children (Moses 1:39).
Far from being a “chain of gods” that diminishes God’s majesty, this doctrine expands our understanding of His eternal nature and His love for us as His children. It underscores the biblical truth that we are created in His image (Genesis 1:27) and invites us to strive for spiritual growth and eventual exaltation through the grace of Jesus Christ.
Conclusion
Glenn E. Chatfield’s critique reflects a misunderstanding of Latter-day Saint theology and relies on logical fallacies, misrepresentation, and dismissive rhetoric. In contrast, LDS doctrine offers a profound and biblically grounded understanding of God’s nature, the Godhead, and our divine potential as His children.
Rather than dismissing LDS beliefs as “absurd,” I invite critics like Chatfield to engage in sincere study and dialogue. By doing so, we can move beyond condescension and ridicule and work toward mutual understanding, even in the face of theological differences.
Understanding Evangelical Criticisms: An LDS Perspective on Faith, Debates, and Mutual Respect
The relationship between Evangelicals and Latter-day Saints is rich with shared hopes and honest differences, yet it's often clouded by misunderstanding. Criticisms aimed at LDS beliefs can, at times, feel personal or even dismissive, but they’re also an opportunity for meaningful dialogue. By approaching these moments with both faith and respect, we can better address concerns without compromising kindness. For Latter-day Saints, understanding the roots of these critiques—and responding with clarity and empathy—can strengthen our own spiritual foundation while fostering genuine conversations about the Restored Gospel.
The Ongoing Debate: Are Latter-day Saints Christians?
The question of whether Latter-day Saints (LDS) are Christians has sparked decades of debate, particularly between members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and Evangelical Christians. At its core, the disagreement revolves around differing interpretations of theology, scripture, and historical Christian identity. Despite the clarity offered by LDS theology on its belief in Jesus Christ, the conversation persists due to both theological and cultural differences.
Defining Christianity: The Role of Creeds and Scripture
When Evangelicals discuss Christianity, they often rely on historical creeds such as the Nicene Creed, which serves as a formal declaration of Christian doctrine. These creeds were developed centuries after Christ to unify beliefs about the nature of God and Jesus Christ, particularly focusing on the Trinity. To many Evangelicals, affirming these creeds is essential to being considered a Christian.
Latter-day Saints, however, approach the concept of Christianity differently. They do not recite or endorse these creeds, as they believe early post-apostolic councils marked a departure from the original teachings of Christ. Instead, they emphasize their unique canon of scripture—including the Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, and Pearl of Great Price—alongside the Bible, as a restored continuation of Jesus's gospel. This distinction often leads to disagreements, as critics argue that rejecting traditional creeds equates to rejecting Christianity itself.
Yet, from another perspective, Christianity is not solely defined by ancient councils or creeds but by a commitment to follow Christ. By this broader definition, Latter-day Saints openly identify as Christians because they worship Jesus Christ as the Savior of humanity and make His teachings the foundation of their faith. This theological divergence shows that "Christianity" can mean different things to different groups.
The LDS Perspective on Jesus Christ
For members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Jesus Christ is the central figure of their theology. They believe He is the Son of God, the promised Messiah, and the Redeemer of the world. LDS doctrine affirms the divinity and mission of Jesus, emphasizing both His premortal role in creating the earth and His atoning sacrifice as the cornerstone of salvation.
Here's how Latter-day Saints describe their relationship with Christ:
The Atonement: Central to LDS belief, the Atonement of Jesus Christ covers both physical death and personal sin. They teach that His suffering in Gethsemane, crucifixion, and resurrection made eternal life possible for all.
Christ’s Authority: Latter-day Saints believe Christ restored His church through Joseph Smith, ensuring it carries His divine authority. This restoration reinforces their connection to Him as the head of their faith.
Personal Relationship: Members frequently testify of a personal, direct relationship with Jesus Christ, achieved through prayer, repentance, and striving to live His teachings.
Despite these teachings, critics point to differences in how LDS theology frames the relationship among God the Father, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Spirit. Unlike the Trinity as defined in historical creeds, Latter-day Saints teach that these three beings are separate individuals united in purpose. This distinction is sometimes seen by others as a deviation from Christian orthodoxy, even though LDS doctrine remains centered on Jesus.
Why This Debate Persists
So, why does this debate linger? The reasons are layered, encompassing both theological concerns and cultural dynamics.
Definitional Disputes: Many Evangelical Christians hold that adherence to specific doctrines, such as the Triune God as defined in the Nicene Creed, is non-negotiable for Christian identity. Latter-day Saints, however, interpret scriptures differently and reject the need for post-biblical creeds, favoring ongoing revelation. This clash of definitions creates an ongoing impasse.
Cultural Disconnects: Beyond theology, cultural undercurrents fuel this debate. LDS practices, such as their missionary efforts, temple worship, and emphasis on modern prophets, are often unfamiliar to Evangelicals. This unfamiliarity can lead to perceptions of Mormonism as "other" rather than a branch of Christianity.
Competition for Souls: Both groups emphasize missionary work, which unavoidably leads to tension. Some Evangelicals may view the LDS Church as a rival religion in the effort to bring people to Christ. Similarly, Latter-day Saints may feel unfairly targeted when their intentions and faith are questioned.
Historical Context: The roots of this debate stretch back centuries. Evangelical critiques often stem from longstanding concerns over LDS doctrine, while Latter-day Saints see their faith as a restoration of Christ’s original teachings. This dynamic keeps the conversation alive, even as LDS members assert their place within the broader Christian community.
In short, this debate endures because of fundamental differences in how each group views God, scripture, and authority. But beneath these differences lies an opportunity for mutual understanding and respectful dialogue—if both sides are willing to listen.
The Nature of God: One God or Many?
When it comes to understanding the nature of God, Evangelicals and Latter-day Saints (LDS) diverge on foundational theology. At the center of this discussion is the question: is God a singular being in three persons, or three distinct beings united in purpose? This section explores both perspectives while addressing common criticisms about the Latter-day Saint view of the Godhead.
The Evangelical View of the Trinity
Evangelical Christians believe in the doctrine of the Trinity, which states that God is one in essence but exists as three co-eternal, co-equal persons—God the Father, God the Son (Jesus Christ), and God the Holy Spirit. While distinct in their relational roles, they are of the same divine substance. This teaching is deeply rooted in historical Christian creeds, such as the Nicene Creed, which formalized this understanding in the fourth century.
For Evangelicals, the Trinity is seen as a mystery that transcends human comprehension but is supported by scripture. For example:
Matthew 28:19 refers to baptizing in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
John 10:30 emphasizes Jesus stating, "I and the Father are one."
2 Corinthians 13:14 highlights the triune nature in Paul’s epistle.
Evangelicals often emphasize that the Trinity preserves strict monotheism, rejecting any interpretation that suggests polytheism or tritheism. They see God as one being but manifesting eternally in three persons who are inseparable in their existence and work.
LDS Belief in the Godhead
In contrast, Latter-day Saints hold a different view of the Godhead. While they also recognize God the Father, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Ghost as divine figures, they reject the notion of a singular essence shared by three persons. Instead, they believe these entities are three distinct beings united in purpose, will, and love. Each member has unique attributes and roles, working together harmoniously in perfect unity.
Latter-day Saints often point to scriptural examples that demonstrate the separateness of the Godhead:
Jesus’ Baptism (Matthew 3:16-17): The Father’s voice, the Son’s physical presence, and the Holy Ghost descending as a dove clearly depict three separate beings.
Acts 7:55-56: Stephen sees Jesus standing at the right hand of the Father, reinforcing their distinctness.
John 17:11, 22: Jesus prays for His disciples to be "one" as He and the Father are one, highlighting unity of purpose rather than essence.
Unlike traditional Christianity, LDS theology teaches that God the Father and Jesus Christ have glorified physical bodies, while the Holy Ghost is a spirit. Critics often label this perspective as polytheistic, but Latter-day Saints argue that the Godhead’s complete unity makes them "one God" in a functional and relational sense.
Historical and Scriptural Arguments for the LDS View
Latter-day Saints turn to both scripture and historical insight to defend their belief in the Godhead. Early Christian writings and biblical accounts provide a foundation for this interpretation.
Biblical Evidence of Distinction:
Genesis 1:26: "Let us make man in our image" suggests a conversation among divine beings.
Psalm 82:6: "Ye are gods," interpreted by Latter-day Saints to support the plurality of divine beings.
Post-Apostolic Shifts: LDS scholars argue that after the deaths of the apostles, a gradual blending of Hellenistic philosophy with Christian teachings led to the development of doctrines like the Trinity. Terms such as "ousia" (essence) used in the Nicene Creed are seen as reflecting Greek metaphysical concepts rather than biblical theology.
Restoration of Truth: Joseph Smith’s First Vision plays a pivotal role in LDS apologetics. In this vision, God the Father and Jesus Christ appeared as separate, glorified beings, affirming the Latter-day Saint understanding. Modern revelations, such as those found in the Doctrine and Covenants, expand on this restored doctrine of the Godhead.
Historical Christian Writings: Early Christian theologians, like Justin Martyr and Origin, made statements that some interpret as aligning more closely with the LDS perspective. For instance, Justin spoke of the Father as the supreme God and the Son as subordinate, a view that differs from the co-equal framework of the Trinity.
Latter-day Saints also challenge the doctrine of "creation ex nihilo" (creation out of nothing), which became central to Trinitarian theology. Instead, they teach "creation from existing material," emphasizing that God organizes pre-existing matter. This aligns with their understanding of God as a relational and knowable being.
By drawing on scripture and historical shifts in Christian thought, Latter-day Saints aim to show that their concept of the Godhead restores original biblical teachings. Critics who dismiss it as polytheistic may misunderstand its emphasis on unity rather than singularity. LDS theology asserts that these differences do not contradict faith in Jesus Christ but reflect a broader, restored view of His divine mission.
Scriptural Additions: The Book of Mormon and Open Canon
The discussion surrounding scripture often highlights a significant divide between Evangelicals and Latter-day Saints (LDS). Evangelicals generally hold firm to the concept of a "closed canon," whereas Latter-day Saints embrace the idea of an "open canon" that includes modern revelations. This contrast goes beyond just theological disagreement—it reflects differing views on how God speaks to His children. Let’s dive into this topic and break it down.
Evangelical Concerns Over Adding to the Bible
For many Evangelicals, the idea of adding to scripture goes against their understanding of biblical authority. They frequently cite verses such as Revelation 22:18-19, which warns against adding to or taking away from the "words of the prophecy of this book." While this passage specifically refers to the Book of Revelation, Evangelicals often interpret it as a warning against any further revelation beyond the Bible as a whole.
The basis of these concerns lies in the belief that the Bible represents God's complete and final word to humanity. After the apostolic era, they argue, authoritative revelation ceased, leaving the Bible as the singular guide for faith and salvation. This theological framework is deeply tied to the historical development of Christianity, particularly during the formation of the biblical canon.
Here’s how these concerns often manifest:
Finality of Revelation: Evangelicals view the Bible as sufficient for all doctrine and guidance. Any new revelation is considered unnecessary or even heretical.
Authority of Apostles: They see the apostles as uniquely qualified to deliver divine teaching. Since the apostolic age ended, no one else holds the authority to contribute to scripture.
Misuse of Authority: There’s a worry that additional scripture opens the door to doctrinal errors or human manipulation of sacred texts.
While these arguments are heartfelt, they stem from a fundamentally different understanding of scripture when compared to that of Latter-day Saints.
The LDS Defense of the Book of Mormon
For members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, the Book of Mormon is not an addition to the Bible—it’s a companion to it. They view it as "Another Testament of Jesus Christ," intended to clarify and reinforce God’s teachings. Latter-day Saints argue that God’s ability to speak to His children didn’t end with the apostles or with the Bible’s canonization.
Here’s why the Book of Mormon and an open canon are central to LDS theology:
God’s Continuing Communication: Latter-day Saints affirm that God communicates with people today just as He did in biblical times. Prophets, like those in ancient Israel, reveal His will in every age.
Restoration of Lost Truths: The Book of Mormon is seen as restoring plain and precious truths that were lost or distorted through centuries of translation and interpretation of the Bible.
Unity of Scripture: LDS teachings emphasize that the Book of Mormon complements the Bible. Far from diminishing it, they believe it enriches one’s understanding of Christ’s mission and the plan of salvation.
Consider examples from the Book of Mormon that underscore its spiritual significance:
The Sermon at the Temple in 3 Nephi mirrors Christ’s Sermon on the Mount, offering additional context and guidance.
Passages in 2 Nephi expand on the doctrine of grace, repentance, and the purpose of mortality in ways that resonate with biblical teachings.
Through the testimony of ancient prophets like Nephi and Alma, readers gain another perspective on universal themes of faith, redemption, and God’s enduring love.
For Latter-day Saints, modern revelation—including the Book of Mormon—testifies that God’s work is ongoing. To shut the door on further divine communication would be to limit God in their minds.
Why This Debate Remains Unresolved
The disagreement over additional scripture remains a significant barrier between Evangelicals and Latter-day Saints. At its core, the debate revolves around two fundamentally different questions: What is scripture, and who has the authority to declare it?
From the Evangelical perspective:
Scriptural Authority is Closed: They see scripture as unchanging and complete. Modern revelations—or claims to them—are viewed as undermining the sufficiency of the Bible.
Guarding Against Heresy: Caution is emphasized to protect the integrity of biblical teachings, which Evangelicals believe have already been divinely established and preserved.
From the LDS perspective:
Scriptural Authority is Open: They believe God’s work continues in every dispensation. Just as He revealed His will through prophets in ancient times, He continues to do so through modern prophets today.
A Living Church: Latter-day Saints consider ongoing revelation as evidence of God’s active role in guiding His Church. Without it, they believe the Church would lose its divine direction.
This disagreement is also tied to broader historical and cultural factors:
Varying Canons Historically: Early Christianity lacked a fully agreed-upon canon. While the 66 books of the Protestant Bible are standard for most Evangelicals, Latter-day Saints often point to variations in Catholic and Orthodox canons as proof that “closed canon” claims are subjective.
Interpretive Differences: Evangelicals focus on certain biblical warnings, like the one in Revelation, to argue against additions. Latter-day Saints counter that these warnings refer to specific contexts, not the Bible as a whole.
Faith in Modern Prophets: Evangelicals see modern prophetic claims as dangerously self-serving, while Latter-day Saints view them as central to God’s plan for guiding humanity.
Ultimately, this debate reflects a deeper divergence in the way each faith approaches the questions of authority, revelation, and tradition. While agreement may feel out of reach, the conversation offers an opportunity for both groups to explain their beliefs and grow in mutual understanding.
Salvation: Faith, Grace, and Works
The doctrine of salvation is a cornerstone of Christian belief, and it’s also at the heart of some of the most persistent criticisms aimed at The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Evangelical Christians often argue that LDS teachings place more emphasis on works than grace, leading to charges of doctrinal error. But is this criticism fair, and how do Latter-day Saints explain the interplay of faith, grace, and works? Let’s break it down.
Evangelical Criticism: Works vs. Grace
One of the most common doctrinal criticisms from Evangelical Christians centers on the belief that salvation comes by grace alone through faith alone, a cornerstone of Protestant theology stemming from the Reformation. Key scriptural references like Ephesians 2:8-9 declare, "For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast." For many Evangelicals, this underscores the idea that human actions—or works—play no role in securing salvation.
From this perspective, LDS teachings, which emphasize ordinances, commandments, and covenants, are often misunderstood as a belief that salvation must be "earned." Evangelicals may see these requirements as conflicting with the "free gift" of grace described in the New Testament. They worry that Latter-day Saints dilute Christ’s atonement by attaching conditions to it, turning salvation into a reward for obedience rather than an unmerited act of divine love.
However, this critique often stems from a misunderstanding of LDS theology rather than a clear examination of its teachings. Evangelicals tend to categorize any emphasis on works as a rejection of grace, but this oversimplifies the nuanced LDS view.
LDS Teachings on Grace and Works
In the Latter-day Saint understanding, grace is central to salvation—so much so that without Christ’s Atonement, no one could be saved. LDS doctrine teaches that grace is a gift freely given by God. It is not earned, bought, or deserved; it’s the enabling power that helps us overcome sin and death. But here’s where a key distinction comes in: while grace opens the door to salvation, individuals must choose to walk through it.
Here’s how Latter-day Saints explain the relationship between faith, grace, and works:
Faith in Christ provides access to grace. Belief in Jesus Christ as the Redeemer is the foundation. Without faith, there can be no access to the saving power of His Atonement.
Grace empowers righteous action. Far from being an "either-or" equation, works are seen as an outgrowth of faith. James 2:17 puts it plainly: "Faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone."
Works demonstrate covenantal commitment. Commandments, ordinances, and good deeds don’t earn salvation, but they signify a willing heart and a desire to follow Christ. Think of it as a contract: God offers grace, but we show our commitment to Him through action.
A helpful analogy often used in LDS teachings is that of a pair of scissors. Grace is one blade, and works are the other. Both are essential to accomplishing the end result. Grace makes eternal life possible, while works reflect the choices we make to grow spiritually and honor the covenants we’ve made with God.
Key teachings, such as 2 Nephi 25:23 from the Book of Mormon, underscore this balance: “For we know that it is by grace that we are saved, after all we can do.” Critics often misinterpret this to mean that salvation depends entirely on personal effort. In reality, it reflects the understanding that Christ’s grace enables our efforts, and that He makes up for what we cannot achieve on our own.
Persistent Misunderstandings
Why do misconceptions about LDS teachings on grace and works persist? A lot of it comes down to selective readings of scripture and differing definitions of salvation.
Critics often focus exclusively on statements about works in LDS theology while glossing over the extensive emphasis on grace. For example:
Out-of-context scripture quotes: Citing "after all we can do" from 2 Nephi 25:23 without acknowledging that “all we can do” often includes repentance, faith, and a reliance on Christ’s grace leads to misinterpretation.
Works misunderstood as "self-reliance": Some Evangelicals assume that LDS teachings on works imply that members believe they can "earn" God’s favor. This couldn’t be further from the truth. The LDS view is more in line with a partnership—God provides grace, and we do our part through obedience and faith.
Additionally, theological differences in defining salvation create confusion. Evangelicals often interpret salvation as the singular event of being "born again" or accepting Christ, leading to eternal life. Latter-day Saints, on the other hand, see salvation as a process, involving both an initial redemption (made freely available to all through Christ) and ongoing sanctification. For LDS members, the ultimate goal isn’t merely salvation—it’s exaltation, which involves becoming more like God through Christ’s enabling power.
Misunderstandings are also fueled by cultural differences between the two groups. LDS practice, with its heavy emphasis on service, missionary work, and strict commandments, can appear to outsiders as works-centric. However, for members, these actions aren’t about earning grace but expressing gratitude for it.
So how do we navigate these criticisms? By focusing on clarity and dialogue. Conversations about salvation don’t have to be adversarial—they can instead be opportunities to build bridges. Latter-day Saints can affirm their reliance on Christ’s grace while explaining the integral role of works as evidence of faith. Both grace and works are essential; together, they form the complete picture of living and growing in Christ.
The Great Apostasy and Restoration
The concept of the Great Apostasy and subsequent Restoration lies at the heart of Latter-day Saint theology. It frames their understanding of the Church’s history, divine authority, and the purpose of modern revelation. However, this doctrine is also one of the most questioned and criticized by those outside of the faith, particularly Evangelicals. To understand why this debate matters, let’s break it down.
The Evangelical View of Church Continuity
Evangelicals generally believe in the unbroken continuity of Christ’s church throughout history. This conviction rests on passages like Matthew 16:18, where Christ promises, “the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.” For many Evangelicals, this verse guarantees the endurance of the Christian church from its founding moments in the New Testament to the present day.
Their argument often emphasizes:
The Role of the Holy Spirit: Evangelicals believe that the Holy Spirit has guided individuals and institutions within the Church, preventing complete doctrinal corruption or loss of authority.
Faithful Christians Through the Ages: Despite challenges like persecution, political interference, and doctrinal disputes, Evangelicals argue that faithful believers have always existed in some form. Church councils, theological debates, and reform movements are viewed as evidence of God's sustaining hand.
Preservation of the Gospel: Evangelicals hold that the essential truths of Christianity—salvation through faith in Jesus Christ, the authority of scripture, and the work of the Holy Spirit—have been preserved without interruption. While human leaders have failed, God’s hand has ensured that His Church has not.
This view directly counters the Latter-day Saint teaching of a complete apostasy. To Evangelicals, suggesting that the Church fell into wholesale darkness contradicts Christ’s promises and diminishes the work of the Holy Spirit.
The LDS Doctrine of Apostasy and Restoration
For Latter-day Saints, belief in a Great Apostasy is foundational to their understanding of why a Restoration was necessary. They teach that deviations from Christ’s original teachings, combined with the loss of divine authority, occurred after the deaths of the apostles. This departure, often referred to as an "apostasy," created the need for God to step in and restore the truth.
Key aspects of the LDS perspective include:
Biblical Prophecy: Latter-day Saints cite scriptures like Amos 8:11-12, which warns of a "famine" of hearing the words of the Lord, and 2 Thessalonians 2:3, which speaks of a "falling away" before Christ’s second coming. They interpret these passages as evidence of a prophesied apostasy.
Corruption of Doctrine: LDS theology teaches that after the apostles’ deaths, unauthorized changes were made to Christ’s teachings and ordinances. Examples include the adoption of Greek philosophical ideas, which they believe influenced doctrines like the Trinity and altered the simplicity of the gospel.
The Need for Priesthood Authority: The LDS Church emphasizes the loss of priesthood authority during the apostasy. Without this authority, they argue, no individual or institution had the divine right to perform saving ordinances like baptism.
Joseph Smith’s First Vision: According to Joseph Smith, Christ told him that existing Christian churches had strayed from the truth and lacked divine authority. This experience marked the beginning of the Restoration, where truths were reestablished and the priesthood was restored.
The Restoration is viewed as a divine reset, similar to biblical patterns where God called prophets to correct deviations from His plan. Latter-day Saints see their faith as a continuation of Christ’s original church, restored in its fullness.
Why This Issue Is Central to LDS Theology
Without the doctrine of apostasy, there is no need for a restoration. This teaching is not just a historical claim—it’s the very reason The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints exists.
Here’s why it matters:
Defines the Church’s Identity: Latter-day Saints believe their faith is not simply another Christian denomination. Instead, they see it as the restored Church of Jesus Christ, complete with the priesthood, ordinances, and revelation necessary for salvation.
Validates Modern Revelation: The concept of an apostasy underscores the need for living prophets and ongoing revelation. It answers the question, “Why would God speak again today?” Latter-day Saints argue that the Restoration brings clarity and authority lost during the apostasy.
Explains Theological Differences: Key differences between LDS and Evangelical beliefs—such as the nature of God, the role of works in salvation, and the necessity of temple ordinances—all tie back to the claim that crucial elements of Christ’s gospel were lost and later restored.
Shapes the Missionary Effort: The belief in apostasy and restoration motivates the LDS commitment to missionary work. If the fullness of the gospel has been restored, then sharing it with the world becomes a divine mandate.
Critics often dismiss the LDS perspective as unnecessary or historically unfounded, but for Latter-day Saints, it answers big questions about divine authority, the role of scripture, and how God leads His people. Without the Great Apostasy, the entire premise of the Restored Gospel collapses.
The debate between unbroken continuity and restoration isn’t just about history—it’s about how each faith views God’s involvement in His church, and what it means to truly follow Christ today.
Temple Practices and Misconceptions
Discussions about Latter-day Saint (LDS) temples often spark curiosity, confusion, or even outright criticism among those unfamiliar with these sacred practices. For Evangelicals, in particular, LDS temple worship can feel shrouded in mystery, leading to misconceptions about the ceremonies and their spiritual intent. By unpacking these concerns and highlighting parallels with other religious traditions, we can foster greater understanding while addressing misunderstandings.
Evangelical Concerns About Secrecy: How Evangelicals perceive temple practices as secretive or cultic
One of the most common critiques raised by Evangelicals is the perception that LDS temple practices are excessively secretive, and in some cases, even cult-like. Viral videos of ceremonies, recorded without authorization, have added fuel to this fire, often leaving viewers to imagine the worst about what happens within the temple's walls. But where does this concern stem from?
There are three primary reasons behind this critique:
Lack of public familiarity with rituals: The average Evangelical Christian is likely familiar with public worship services—sermons, hymns, and prayers—accessible to all. In contrast, LDS temple rituals are reserved for members in good standing, requiring a temple recommend to enter. This exclusivity can appear exclusionary or secretive to outsiders.
Symbolic acts can seem unfamiliar: Without context, certain symbolic gestures within LDS endowment ceremonies, such as specific clothing or covenant-making, can seem unusual or even alarming to someone from a different Christian tradition. Misinterpretations often morph these symbols into accusations of alignment with unbiblical or occult practices.
Historical misconceptions: Critics, particularly during the early days of LDS history, painted temple worship as mysterious or even sinister. These attitudes have carried forward, bolstered by misinformation rather than genuine engagement with LDS beliefs.
However, to label these practices as "secretive" misses the deeper truth. LDS members view the temple as a sanctified space where they step away from the noise of the world to draw closer to God. The choice to not publicly disclose specific details isn't about secrecy but rather about protecting their sacred nature.
The Sacredness of Temple Worship in LDS Faith: Spiritual significance of temple ceremonies while dispelling misconceptions
For Latter-day Saints, the temple represents God's house—a place unlike any other in its purpose and sanctity. Within its walls, members perform sacred ordinances that connect them to their ancestors and deepen their relationship with Jesus Christ. These ceremonies are not “hidden” out of fear or secrecy; they’re treated with reverence, much like personal prayer or sacred scripture that one wouldn’t casually share in casual settings.
Temple worship is rooted in deep spiritual significance:
Holy covenants: In the temple, members make commitments to live righteous lives, follow Christ, and serve their fellow humans. These covenants are seen as binding promises, made with God, to strive for greater discipleship.
Eternal connections: Through ordinances such as sealing ceremonies, families are united forever, reflecting a belief in the eternal nature of relationships.
A focus on Christ: Above all, the temple points members toward Jesus Christ. Every ordinance testifies of His role as Savior and Redeemer, emphasizing His grace and love.
What about the misunderstanding that members worship Joseph Smith or believe in non-Christian doctrines? These misconceptions are deeply flawed. The temple focuses squarely on God the Father and His Son, Jesus Christ. Members gather there not for idolatry but to recommit themselves to higher spiritual ideals, much like other Christians engage in acts of devotion, such as communion or baptism.
By framing the temple as an essential venue for spiritual growth, LDS members can help others see its sacredness rather than assuming secrecy implies fear or shame.
Parallels to Other Religious Practices: Similarities between LDS temples and sacred rituals in other faiths, like Catholicism and Judaism
Sacred spaces and rituals aren’t unique to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. In fact, they echo across many religious traditions, highlighting the universal human desire for connection with the divine. Considering these parallels provides context and might reduce misunderstanding.
Let’s compare LDS temple practices with those from Catholicism and Judaism:
Catholic tradition: Catholic churches—especially cathedrals—feature areas that are set apart for specific purposes, like altars used for the Eucharist. Moreover, certain Catholic rites, such as the Sacrament of Holy Orders, often occur in closed settings, allowing only ordained participants. These practices emphasize reverence, much like temple ordinances for Latter-day Saints.
Jewish roots: In biblical times, the temple in Jerusalem was revered as a holy site where only certain rites could take place, such as sacrifices performed by Levitical priests. Access to the Holy of Holies was highly restricted, similar to the way LDS temples are reserved for sacred occasions. The use of ceremonial clothing in both traditions also highlights the shared emphasis on symbolism and devotion.
Other global faiths: Look at Hinduism and Buddhism, which feature temples as places for specific, often intimate, religious ceremonies. These spaces are designed to serve the needs of the soul, not the curiosity of the public.
A common theme in all these examples is the interplay of sacred spaces and deeper spiritual meaning. If we can respect the sanctity of a Catholic mass or the Yom Kippur rites in a synagogue, there’s no reason the same respect shouldn’t extend to LDS temple ceremonies.
By drawing these connections to more widely accepted practices, members can help others see that LDS temple worship is part of a broader human tapestry—one where sacredness is honored, not hidden.
Historical Criticisms: Polygamy and Doctrinal Changes
The history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) is filled with moments of profound faith, but it has also faced complex historical issues that invite scrutiny. Among the most persistent criticisms are those surrounding the church's historical practice of polygamy and the perception of doctrinal fluidity. These topics, often misunderstood or oversimplified, remain focal points for many critics of the LDS faith.
The Legacy of Polygamy
Polygamy is one of the most controversial aspects of LDS Church history. During the 19th century, plural marriage was introduced among church members under the leadership of Joseph Smith and later practiced more widely under Brigham Young. However, what many critics fail to recognize is the context in which these decisions were made and the Church’s current position.
The practice of plural marriage, referred to by members as "celestial marriage," arose as what leaders believed to be a divine mandate. While not every member participated, it was seen as a test of faith for those who did. Yet, this practice was highly controversial, facing intense opposition from the U.S. government. By 1890, under threat of legal penalties and political consequences, President Wilford Woodruff issued the Manifesto, instructing members to comply with anti-polygamy laws. This marked a turning point for the Church, as it began to shift away from the practice.
Today, the Church unequivocally disassociates itself from polygamy. Any Latter-day Saint engaging in polygamous relationships faces excommunication, a strict policy designed to emphasize the Church's alignment with modern laws and its rejection of the practice. It is critical to note that small, independent groups that still practice polygamy, such as the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (FLDS), have no affiliation with the LDS Church. These groups often use the term "Mormon," leading to public confusion despite the Church's clear disavowal.
Understanding this history requires nuance. While plural marriage was once part of the Church's practice, it no longer defines its doctrine or identity. Instead, the LDS faith today focuses on traditional family values, monogamy, and Christ-centered teachings, distancing itself from this complex chapter of its past.
Doctrinal Revelations vs. Instability
Critics often challenge the LDS Church by pointing to perceived inconsistencies in its doctrine, asking why certain teachings have changed over time. For members of the Church, however, such shifts aren’t seen as instability—they are viewed as evidence of ongoing revelation.
One of the defining beliefs of the LDS faith is that God continues to reveal His will to prophets today, just as He did in biblical times. This principle stems from the idea that truth unfolds "line upon line," as described in scripture (Isaiah 28:10). Sometimes, this process involves clarifications or adjustments to adapt to changing circumstances.
For example, plural marriage was introduced during a specific period and was later discontinued through divine guidance. Similarly, the 1978 revelation on the priesthood, in which all worthy male members were granted the ability to hold the priesthood regardless of race, is another example of the Church responding to questions of policy through revealed answers. Critics may see these as reversals; Latter-day Saints interpret them as God's guidance for His people at different times and places.
Comparing this to other faith traditions, changes in doctrine or practice are not unheard of. Christianity itself evolved significantly from its early days to include councils, creeds, and altered theological interpretations. The LDS Church embraces its living prophets who seek divine inspiration to lead the Church in an ever-changing world—a practice Latter-day Saints see not as inconsistency but as a mark of divine adaptability.
This approach, though misunderstood, aligns closely with the biblical narrative of God guiding His people through changing circumstances. Without modern revelation, the Church would risk stagnation in a dynamic world, and for Latter-day Saints, that willingness to change reflects spiritual direction, not instability.
Why Historical Criticisms Persist
Despite efforts to clarify its positions, the LDS Church’s past practices and evolving doctrines continue to draw criticism. Why do these issues remain so central to its critics? A few factors contribute to this persistence.
Public Confusion: Polygamy remains a defining stereotype for many outside the LDS faith, partly because of its historical significance and media portrayal. Ongoing confusion between the Church and splinter polygamous groups exacerbates this misunderstanding, leaving many unfairly associating the mainstream Church with practices it abandoned over a century ago.
Doctrinal Flexibility Misinterpreted: From an Evangelical perspective, which often emphasizes scriptural inerrancy and theological consistency, the concept of "ongoing revelation" can seem foreign. Changes like the end of plural marriage or the priesthood revelation are interpreted as doctrinal inconsistency rather than spiritual progression.
Emotional Resonance: Topics like polygamy and race carry significant emotional weight, and understandably so. Historical events tied to these subjects—whether misunderstood or otherwise—leave a lasting impression, making them focal points for debate. Conversations about these issues are often charged with personal and cultural sensitivities that make them difficult to reconcile.
Confirmation Bias: Critics who are predisposed to doubt the Church may seek out historical controversies as evidence to reinforce their skepticism. Instead of approaching subjects like polygamy or doctrinal changes with an open mind, these skeptics may focus on isolated events without the broader context.
Even with these challenges, the Church has taken significant strides to address its history openly. Resources like the "Gospel Topics Essays" provide detailed discussions about controversial issues, ensuring that members and interested outsiders can explore them with a foundation of factual, transparent information.
Ultimately, historical criticisms persist because they touch on deep theological questions about the nature of revelation, the role of religion in society, and how faith communities evolve over time. While these issues may never fully fade from public discourse, they also provide Latter-day Saints a unique opportunity to share their perspectives—and to emphasize how their faith remains rooted in Christ amidst changing circumstances.
Responding to Criticism with Understanding and Respect
Religious conversations have a unique emotional depth. Topics of faith and belief touch the very core of who we are. When dialogue turns critical, it can feel deeply personal, especially when our beliefs are challenged. For Latter-day Saints engaging with Evangelicals, navigating these critiques with grace requires a thoughtful and considerate approach. By focusing on understanding and respect, we can build bridges instead of barriers.
The Importance of Interfaith Dialogue
Creating safe spaces for honest, respectful conversations between Evangelicals and Latter-day Saints is essential. Both groups share a love for Christ, which provides a powerful foundation for meaningful dialogue. Recognizing this shared faith can help foster mutual understanding and defuse tension.
Interfaith dialogue thrives on common ground. For instance, both Evangelicals and Latter-day Saints value scripture, families, and missionary work. These shared values act as stepping stones to better understanding one another, even when significant theological differences exist. By framing discussions around mutual principles, we create an opportunity to strengthen relationships while clarifying beliefs.
In these discussions, I’ve found that humility is a bridge-builder. Asking questions and genuinely engaging with the other person’s perspective shows that you respect not only their beliefs but also their journey. Statements like, “Help me understand where you’re coming from,” can soften hearts and encourage open dialogue. It’s not about avoiding differences but handling them with care.
Addressing Misinformation Effectively
One common challenge Latter-day Saints face in conversations with Evangelicals is correcting misinformation. Whether it’s misconceptions about scripture, doctrines, or practices, misinformation can create frustration. However, addressing it effectively requires calm confidence, not defensiveness.
When someone misrepresents LDS beliefs, consider these strategies:
Clarify without confrontation. Avoid reactive responses like, “That’s not true!” Instead, try, “I see why that might be confusing—can I explain how we see this?”
Focus on accurate definitions. Many misunderstandings stem from a vocabulary gap. Words like "grace," "salvation," or "scripture" can mean different things to different people. A simple explanation of definitions often clears up miscommunication.
Provide credible sources. Pointing critics to reliable resources like the Gospel Topics section of the Church’s website ensures that accurate information is accessible.
It’s also wise to recognize when criticism isn’t rooted in a desire for dialogue but in an attempt to provoke. In these cases, responding calmly—or not at all—can redirect the conversation’s tone. Not every critique deserves a full rebuttal; sometimes your demeanor speaks louder than your words.
Fostering Mutual Respect in Religious Discussions
Respect is the foundation for every productive conversation. This can be especially challenging when facing sharp or repetitive criticisms. Nevertheless, treating others with respect reflects Christ’s teachings and sets the tone for constructive dialogue.
Here’s how I stay grounded in respect during tougher conversations:
Remember the Golden Rule. It may sound simple, but asking yourself, "How would I want someone to approach me with these concerns?" changes how you respond. Leading with kindness often diffuses defensiveness on both sides.
Acknowledge their intent. Most people aren’t trying to offend; they’re sharing what they believe to be true. Acknowledging their sincerity—“I can tell your faith means a lot to you”—shows respect, even as you share your differing views.
Model Christlike humility. In conversations, humility isn’t about withholding an opinion—it’s about offering it with love. Even when beliefs clash, focusing on the person rather than winning the argument builds mutual respect.
It’s also important to approach critics as people first, not opposition. Picture these conversations like stepping into a neighbor’s home—you may not agree with their decor, but you still treat their space with care. Respect communicates that, even when we disagree, their beliefs deserve dignity.
By fostering mutual respect, addressing misconceptions with patience, and building dialogue on shared values, we can respond to criticism with understanding. In doing so, we mirror the principles of the gospel while strengthening our faith through meaningful connections with others.
Conclusion
Building bridges between Evangelicals and Latter-day Saints is more than just addressing theological differences—it's about fostering unity through understanding. Respectful dialogue allows both groups to celebrate shared faith in Christ while seeking clarity amid disagreement.
Criticism, when approached with openness and kindness, can become a tool for strengthening mutual respect. By confidently sharing our beliefs, coupled with empathy, we demonstrate that faith thrives not in silos but in respectful engagement.
Our faith calls us to emphasize shared principles over division. By cultivating compassion and curiosity, we create opportunities for deeper connections, leaving behind a legacy of trust and mutual growth—not confrontation. Let us choose unity over discord, guided by Christ's love in every interaction.
